Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Different Methods of Tillage and Conservation Farming on Nutrient Uptake, Available Nutrient in Soil and Balance Sheet of Nutrient in Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.] Under Rainfed Conditions

Ashwani Kumar Thakur; Sudha Sidar

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Investigation was conducted during kharif season of 2016 at Instructional cum Research Farm, S.G. College of Agriculture and research station, Jagdalpur (C.G.). The soil of experimental field was sandy clay loam in texture and available N was low and, P and K were medium. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with two factors namely tillage practices and different conservation farming with three replications. The treatment consisted of three tillage practices viz. T1- Conventional tillage, T2 –Minimum tillage and T3 – Summer ploughing and five conservation farming viz. C1-Opening conservation, C2-Intercropping with redgram, C3-Mulching, C4-Herbicide application, C5-Combination of all treatments (C1+C2+C3+C4). Two crops were taken as a taste crop viz. finger millet cv “GPU 28” and redgram cv “Rajeevlochan”. The result revealed that summer plouging showed significantly highest available nitrogen and phosphorus but available potassium, pH, organic carbon and EC were recorded non-significant effect. Minimum tillage recorded significantly higher soil moisture and bulk density. N uptake and content recorded significantly highest in summer ploughing and P uptake and content recorded higher in minimum tillage but K uptake was not found significant due to tillage system in grain. In straw, N uptake was significantly higher in summer ploughing but N content was higher in conventional tillage whereas, P and K were found non-significant effect in tillage practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer ploughing significantly raised available nitrogen and phosphorus in the soil.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
summer plouginge1
Outcome
available nitrogen and phosphoruse1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–190 · show in text ↑
e1

“summer plouging showed significantly highest available nitrogen and phosphorus but available potassium, pH, organic carbon and EC were recorded non-significant effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer ploughing had no significant effect on available potassium, pH and organic carbon in the soil.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
summer plouginge1
Outcome
available potassium, pH, organic carbone1
Direction
non-significant effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–190 · show in text ↑
e1

“summer plouging showed significantly highest available nitrogen and phosphorus but available potassium, pH, organic carbon and EC were recorded non-significant effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer ploughing had no significant effect on soil EC.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
summer plouginge1
Outcome
ECe1
Direction
non-significant effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–190 · show in text ↑
e1

“summer plouging showed significantly highest available nitrogen and phosphorus but available potassium, pH, organic carbon and EC were recorded non-significant effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage significantly raised soil moisture and bulk density.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Minimum tillagee2
Outcome
soil moisture and bulk densitye2
Direction
highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–190 · show in text ↑
e2

“Minimum tillage recorded significantly higher soil moisture and bulk density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1098 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer ploughing significantly raised N uptake and content in finger millet.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
summer ploughinge3
Outcome
N uptake and contente3
Direction
higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–190 · show in text ↑
e3

“N uptake and content recorded significantly highest in summer ploughing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage raised P uptake and content in finger millet.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
minimum tillagee4
Outcome
P uptake and contente4
Direction
highere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–190 · show in text ↑
e4

“P uptake and content recorded higher in minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1231 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage system had no significant effect on K uptake in grain.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Organ / stage
graine5
Treatment
tillage systeme5
Outcome
K uptakee5
Direction
not found significante5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–190 · show in text ↑
e5

“K uptake was not found significant due to tillage system in grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1301 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In straw, summer ploughing significantly raised N uptake.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Organ / stage
strawe6
Treatment
summer ploughinge6
Outcome
N uptakee6
Direction
highere6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–190 · show in text ↑
e6

“In straw, N uptake was significantly higher in summer ploughing but N content was higher in conventional tillage whereas, P and K were found non-significant effect in tillage practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1487 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In straw, conventional tillage gave higher N content.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Organ / stage
strawe6
Treatment
conventional tillagee6
Outcome
N contente6
Direction
highere6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–190 · show in text ↑
e6

“In straw, N uptake was significantly higher in summer ploughing but N content was higher in conventional tillage whereas, P and K were found non-significant effect in tillage practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1487 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In straw, tillage practices had no significant effect on P and K.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Organ / stage
strawe6
Treatment
tillage practicese6
Outcome
P and Ke6
Direction
non-significant effecte6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–190 · show in text ↑
e6

“In straw, N uptake was significantly higher in summer ploughing but N content was higher in conventional tillage whereas, P and K were found non-significant effect in tillage practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1487 · show in text ↑

tillage · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.