Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during Kharif 2024 at RCSM College of Agriculture, Kolhapur of Mahatma Phule Krushi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Ahilyanagar, Maharashtra, India using a randomized block design with 13 treatments and 3 replications. The study aimed to assess the effects of foliar nutrient sprays on the growth, yield, quality and nutrient uptake by finger millet. The soil was black vertisol with silty loam texture and moderate fertility. Foliar application of 19:19:19 @ 2% at tillering and flowering stages significantly improved yield attributes, grain yield (23.74 q/ha), straw yield (29.52 q/ha), and nutrient uptake (N: 44.88, P2O5: 16.04, K2O: 43.10 kg/ha). These results were statistically on par with two foliar sprays of MPKV’s Phule Liquid Micro Grade II @ 1%, making both treatments agronomically and economically viable for enhancing finger millet productivity.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar 19:19:19 at 2% significantly improved grain yield, 23.74 q/ha.
- Taxon
- finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.)
Eleusine coracanat0 - Treatment
- Foliar application of 19:19:19 @ 2% at tillering and flowering stagese0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 23.74 q/hae0
- Setting
- RCSM College of Agriculture, Kolhapure2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application of 19:19:19 @ 2% at tillering and flowering stages significantly improved yield attributes, grain yield (23.74 q/ha), straw yield (29.52 q/ha), and nutrient uptake (N: 44.88, P2O5: 16.04, K2O: 43.10 kg/ha)”
e2“A field experiment was conducted during Kharif 2024 at RCSM College of Agriculture, Kolhapur”
t0“finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar 19:19:19 at 2% significantly improved straw yield, 29.52 q/ha.
- Taxon
- finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- Foliar application of 19:19:19 @ 2% at tillering and flowering stagese0
- Outcome
- straw yielde0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 29.52 q/hae0
- Setting
- RCSM College of Agriculture, Kolhapure2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application of 19:19:19 @ 2% at tillering and flowering stages significantly improved yield attributes, grain yield (23.74 q/ha), straw yield (29.52 q/ha), and nutrient uptake (N: 44.88, P2O5: 16.04, K2O: 43.10 kg/ha)”
e2“A field experiment was conducted during Kharif 2024 at RCSM College of Agriculture, Kolhapur”
t0“finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar 19:19:19 at 2% significantly improved nitrogen uptake, 44.88 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- Foliar application of 19:19:19 @ 2% at tillering and flowering stagese0
- Outcome
- nutrient uptakee0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 44.88e0
- Qualifier
- Ne0
- Setting
- RCSM College of Agriculture, Kolhapure2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application of 19:19:19 @ 2% at tillering and flowering stages significantly improved yield attributes, grain yield (23.74 q/ha), straw yield (29.52 q/ha), and nutrient uptake (N: 44.88, P2O5: 16.04, K2O: 43.10 kg/ha)”
e2“A field experiment was conducted during Kharif 2024 at RCSM College of Agriculture, Kolhapur”
t0“finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar 19:19:19 at 2% significantly improved phosphorus uptake, 16.04 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- Foliar application of 19:19:19 @ 2% at tillering and flowering stagese0
- Outcome
- nutrient uptakee0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 16.04e0
- Qualifier
- P2O5e0
- Setting
- RCSM College of Agriculture, Kolhapure2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application of 19:19:19 @ 2% at tillering and flowering stages significantly improved yield attributes, grain yield (23.74 q/ha), straw yield (29.52 q/ha), and nutrient uptake (N: 44.88, P2O5: 16.04, K2O: 43.10 kg/ha)”
e2“A field experiment was conducted during Kharif 2024 at RCSM College of Agriculture, Kolhapur”
t0“finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar 19:19:19 at 2% significantly improved potassium uptake, 43.10 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- Foliar application of 19:19:19 @ 2% at tillering and flowering stagese0
- Outcome
- nutrient uptakee0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 43.10e0
- Qualifier
- K2Oe0
- Setting
- RCSM College of Agriculture, Kolhapure2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application of 19:19:19 @ 2% at tillering and flowering stages significantly improved yield attributes, grain yield (23.74 q/ha), straw yield (29.52 q/ha), and nutrient uptake (N: 44.88, P2O5: 16.04, K2O: 43.10 kg/ha)”
e2“A field experiment was conducted during Kharif 2024 at RCSM College of Agriculture, Kolhapur”
t0“finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar 19:19:19 at 2% significantly improved yield attributes.
- Taxon
- finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- Foliar application of 19:19:19 @ 2% at tillering and flowering stagese0
- Outcome
- yield attributese0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Setting
- RCSM College of Agriculture, Kolhapure2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application of 19:19:19 @ 2% at tillering and flowering stages significantly improved yield attributes, grain yield (23.74 q/ha), straw yield (29.52 q/ha), and nutrient uptake (N: 44.88, P2O5: 16.04, K2O: 43.10 kg/ha)”
e2“A field experiment was conducted during Kharif 2024 at RCSM College of Agriculture, Kolhapur”
t0“finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Two foliar sprays of the Phule Liquid Micro Grade II at 1% were statistically on par with foliar 19:19:19 at 2% for productivity.
- Taxon
- finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- two foliar sprays of MPKV’s Phule Liquid Micro Grade II @ 1%e1
- Outcome
- productivitye1
- Direction
- on pare1
- Comparator
- 19:19:19 @ 2%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application of 19:19:19 @ 2% at tillering and flowering stages significantly improved yield attributes, grain yield (23.74 q/ha), straw yield (29.52 q/ha), and nutrient uptake (N: 44.88, P2O5: 16.04, K2O: 43.10 kg/ha)”
e1“These results were statistically on par with two foliar sprays of MPKV’s Phule Liquid Micro Grade II @ 1%, making both treatments agronomically and economically viable for enhancing finger millet productivity”
t0“finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Both foliar treatments are agronomically and economically viable for enhancing finger millet productivity.
- Taxon
- finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
- Outcome
- agronomically and economically viablee1
- Qualifier
- for enhancing finger millet productivitye1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“These results were statistically on par with two foliar sprays of MPKV’s Phule Liquid Micro Grade II @ 1%, making both treatments agronomically and economically viable for enhancing finger millet productivity”
t0“finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”
The same questions in other papers
stage · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
stage · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →application · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →tillage · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
tillage · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →application · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
55 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
52 papers more in this group
See all 56 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.