Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar 19:19:19 at 2% significantly improved straw yield, 29.52 q/ha.

A claim from Performance of different foliar nutrient applications on yield and nutrient uptake by finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 19:19:19 at 2% significantly improved straw yield, 29.52 q/ha.

Taxon
finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Foliar application of 19:19:19 @ 2% at tillering and flowering stagese0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
29.52 q/hae0
Setting
RCSM College of Agriculture, Kolhapure2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of 19:19:19 @ 2% at tillering and flowering stages significantly improved yield attributes, grain yield (23.74 q/ha), straw yield (29.52 q/ha), and nutrient uptake (N: 44.88, P2O5: 16.04, K2O: 43.10 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–672
e2

“A field experiment was conducted during Kharif 2024 at RCSM College of Agriculture, Kolhapur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–92
t0

“finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–122

Title

Performance of different foliar nutrient applications on yield and nutrient uptake by finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.)

Shravani V Sase; Jagdish B Patil; Sagar A Kamble; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2025. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2025.v8.i9p.3922

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-89c671c375bd2bf2b896674d7e713652c1790f62627e8fd67d2fd619a84a83ef · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

stage · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

tillage · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

56 papers: 56 positive, 0 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.