Paper · 2017 · Egyptian Pharmaceutical Journal

Effect of some of the natural organic sources on rice tissue culture

AhmedM Amer; GehadM Mohamed; MonaH Hussein; et al.

9
claims
22
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Objective The main goal of this investigation was to evaluate the effect of glutamine, tryptophan, and casein hydrolysate on callus induction and shoot regeneration in two Egyptian rice cultivars (Sakha104 and Giza178).Materials and methods Different concentrations of tryptophan, glutamine, and casein hydrolysate were investigated separately for the maximum production of callus and shoot regeneration.Results and conclusion Although tryptophan demonstrated a stimulatory effect on callus induction of Sakha104 cultivar, it showed no positive effect on callus initiation of Giza178 genotype and shoot regeneration of both cultivars. Inclusion of glutamine did not enhance either callus induction or shoot regeneration in both cultivars. Supplementation of appropriate amounts of casein hydrolysate resulted in positive response in both callus induction and shoot regeneration. In addition, these responses varied significantly between the two tested cultivars. Irrespective of type and concentration of the natural organic source, Sakha104 proved to have better regeneration capacity than that of Giza178.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tryptophan stimulated callus induction in Sakha104 rice.

Material
Sakha104e0
Treatment
tryptophane0
Outcome
callus inductione0
Direction
stimulatorye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tryptophan demonstrated a stimulatory effect on callus induction of Sakha104 cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–521 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tryptophan showed no positive effect on callus initiation in Giza178 rice.

Material
Giza178e0
Treatment
tryptophane1
Outcome
callus initiatione0
Direction
no positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it showed no positive effect on callus initiation of Giza178 genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–592 · show in text ↑
e1

“tryptophan demonstrated a stimulatory effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–480 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tryptophan showed no positive effect on shoot regeneration in both cultivars.

Treatment
tryptophane2
Outcome
shoot regeneratione0
Direction
no positive effecte1
Qualifier
both cultivarse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot regeneration of both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–633 · show in text ↑
e1

“it showed no positive effect on callus initiation of Giza178 genotype and shoot regeneration of both cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–634 · show in text ↑
e2

“tryptophan demonstrated a stimulatory effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–480 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glutamine did not enhance callus induction in either rice cultivar.

Treatment
glutaminee0
Outcome
callus inductione0
Direction
did not enhancee0
Qualifier
both cultivarse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inclusion of glutamine did not enhance either callus induction or shoot regeneration in both cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–738 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glutamine did not enhance shoot regeneration in either rice cultivar.

Treatment
glutaminee0
Outcome
shoot regeneratione0
Direction
did not enhancee0
Qualifier
both cultivarse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inclusion of glutamine did not enhance either callus induction or shoot regeneration in both cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–738 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Appropriate casein hydrolysate supplementation improved callus induction.

Treatment
appropriate amounts of casein hydrolysatee0
Outcome
callus inductione0
Direction
positive responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Supplementation of appropriate amounts of casein hydrolysate resulted in positive response in both callus induction and shoot regeneration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Appropriate casein hydrolysate supplementation improved shoot regeneration.

Treatment
appropriate amounts of casein hydrolysatee0
Outcome
shoot regeneratione0
Direction
positive responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Supplementation of appropriate amounts of casein hydrolysate resulted in positive response in both callus induction and shoot regeneration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Callus and regeneration responses differed significantly between the two rice cultivars.

Material
Sakha104 and Giza178e1
Outcome
these responsese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these responses varied significantly between the two tested cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–962 · show in text ↑
e1

“two Egyptian rice cultivars (Sakha104 and Giza178)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–218 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha104 rice regenerated better than Giza178 regardless of organic source and concentration.

Material
Sakha104e0
Outcome
regeneration capacitye0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
Irrespective of type and concentration of the natural organic sourcee0
Comparator
Giza178e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrespective of type and concentration of the natural organic source, Sakha104 proved to have better regeneration capacity than that of Giza178.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 · show in text ↑

glutamine · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

tryptophan · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.