Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of post-emergence herbicides on yield and economics of sesame (Sesamum indicum)

SOURAV GUPTA; S.S. KUSHWAH; RAJENDRA MANDLOI; et al.

10
claims
26
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) seasons of 2013 and 2014 at Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, to study effect of post-emergence herbicides on yield and economics of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). The ex- periment was laid out in a randomzied block design (RBD) replicated thrice, with 8 treatments. Sesame variety TKG 22 was grown by adopting recommended package of practices except weed-control measures which were applied as per treatments. Two hand-weedings at 20 and 40 days after sowing (DAS) gave significantly higher weed control efficiency (94.14%), followed by propaquizafop @ 125 g a.i./ha (69.51%) over rest of the weed-con- trol treatments. Pooled results showed significantly higher growth and yield attributes and seed yield (718 kg/ha), stalk yield (3,243 kg/ha), gross income ( 73.4 103), net income ( 47.3 103) and benefit: cost ratio (2.82) under 2 hand-weeding at 20 and 40 DAS over rest of the weed-control treatments, followed by propaquizafop @ 50 g a.i./ha. Application of propaquizafop @ 125 g a.i./ha produced phytotoxicity on sesame plants and subsequently affected the growth attributes in crop; however, symptoms of chlorosis disappeared 2530 days after application of herbicides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings yielded 94.14% weed control efficiency, higher than other treatments.

Treatment
Two hand-weedings at 20 and 40 days after sowing (DAS)e0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
94.14%e0
Comparator
rest of the weed-con- trol treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two hand-weedings at 20 and 40 days after sowing (DAS) gave significantly higher weed control efficiency (94.14%), followed by propaquizafop @ 125 g a.i./ha (69.51%) over rest of the weed-con- trol treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–662 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propaquizafop at 125 g active ingredient per hectare had 69.51% weed control efficiency.

Treatment
propaquizafop @ 125 g a.i./hae0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye1
Value
69.51%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“propaquizafop @ 125 g a.i./ha (69.51%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–619 · show in text ↑
e1

“weed control efficiency (94.14%), followed by propaquizafop @ 125 g a.i./ha (69.51%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–619 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings yielded 718 kg/ha seed, above other treatments.

Treatment
2 hand-weeding at 20 and 40 DASe0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere1
Value
718 kg/hae0
Comparator
rest of the weed-control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield (718 kg/ha), stalk yield (3,243 kg/ha), gross income ( 73.4 103), net income ( 47.3 103) and benefit: cost ratio (2.82) under 2 hand-weeding at 20 and 40 DAS over rest of the weed-control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–948 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pooled results showed significantly higher growth and yield attributes and seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–749 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings yielded 3,243 kg/ha stalk, above other treatments.

Treatment
2 hand-weeding at 20 and 40 DASe0
Outcome
stalk yielde0
Direction
highere1
Value
3,243 kg/hae0
Comparator
rest of the weed-control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield (718 kg/ha), stalk yield (3,243 kg/ha), gross income ( 73.4 103), net income ( 47.3 103) and benefit: cost ratio (2.82) under 2 hand-weeding at 20 and 40 DAS over rest of the weed-control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–948 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pooled results showed significantly higher growth and yield attributes and seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–749 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave gross income of 73.4 103, above other treatments.

Treatment
2 hand-weeding at 20 and 40 DASe0
Outcome
gross incomee0
Direction
highere1
Value
73.4 103e0
Comparator
rest of the weed-control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gross income ( 73.4 103), net income ( 47.3 103) and benefit: cost ratio (2.82) under 2 hand-weeding at 20 and 40 DAS over rest of the weed-control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–948 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pooled results showed significantly higher growth and yield attributes and seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–749 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave net income of 47.3 103, above other treatments.

Treatment
2 hand-weeding at 20 and 40 DASe0
Outcome
net incomee0
Direction
highere1
Value
47.3 103e0
Comparator
rest of the weed-control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gross income ( 73.4 103), net income ( 47.3 103) and benefit: cost ratio (2.82) under 2 hand-weeding at 20 and 40 DAS over rest of the weed-control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–948 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pooled results showed significantly higher growth and yield attributes and seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–749 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave benefit-cost ratio 2.82, above other treatments.

Treatment
2 hand-weeding at 20 and 40 DASe0
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
highere1
Value
2.82e0
Comparator
rest of the weed-control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“benefit: cost ratio (2.82) under 2 hand-weeding at 20 and 40 DAS over rest of the weed-control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–948 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pooled results showed significantly higher growth and yield attributes and seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–749 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave higher growth and yield attributes, followed by 50 g propaquizafop.

Treatment
2 hand-weeding at 20 and 40 DASe0
Outcome
growth and yield attributese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
rest of the weed-control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pooled results showed significantly higher growth and yield attributes and seed yield (718 kg/ha), stalk yield (3,243 kg/ha), gross income ( 73.4 103), net income ( 47.3 103) and benefit: cost ratio (2.82) under 2 hand-weeding at 20 and 40 DAS over rest of the weed-control treatments, followed by propaquizafop @ 50 g a.i./ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–990 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propaquizafop at 125 g active ingredient per hectare caused phytotoxicity and impaired growth attributes.

Treatment
propaquizafop @ 125 g a.i./hae0
Outcome
phytotoxicitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of propaquizafop @ 125 g a.i./ha produced phytotoxicity on sesame plants and subsequently affected the growth attributes in crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1132 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorosis symptoms disappeared 2530 days after herbicide application.

Outcome
symptoms of chlorosis disappearede0
Value
2530 dayse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“symptoms of chlorosis disappeared 2530 days after application of herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 61 positive, 6 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.