Paper · 2017 · Ukrainian Journal of Ecology

Effects of irrigation disruption and Barvar-2 phosphate biofertilizer on Agronomic Characteristics of Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)

Afshar Khadiri Aghleh Boob; Ali Nasrollahzadeh Asl

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In order to evaluate the effects of irrigation disruption and Barvar-2 phosphate biofertilizer at different stages of growth on Agronomic Characteristics of Sesame, An experiment was conducted as split plot based on randomized complete block design with three replications in Salmas city, northwest of Iran, during spring of 2016. The main plot was Barvar-2 phosphate biofertilizer at two levels (control or non-biofertilizer and Barvar-2 phosphate biofertilizer) and irrigation disruption as the sub-factor in five levels including control or not irrigation disruption, irrigation disruption at 10 leaf stage, irrigation disruption at flowering stage, irrigation disruption at capsule formation stage, irrigation disruption at grain filling stage was considered. Results indicated that effect of Barvar-2 phosphate biofertilizer on Number of branches per plant, number of capsules per plant, number of seeds per capsule, seed oil percent and seed yield has been significant. The maximum seed yield at 1726.03 kg.ha-1 was observed in Barvar-2 phosphate biofertilizer. Effect of irrigation disruption on Plant height, number of branches per plant, number of capsules per plant, seed number per capsule, seed oil percent and seed yield has been significant. The highest seed yield (1985 kg.ha-1) was observed in control or non irrigation disruption treatment, which did not show significant difference with irrigation disruption treatment at 10 leaf stage. In order to save water irrigation disruption can be recommended at this stage of growth, especially in low water areas. The minimum seed yield was observed at 1214 kg.ha-1 in irrigation disruption treatment at flowering stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Barvar-2 phosphate biofertilizer significantly affected branch number, capsules, seeds per capsule, oil percentage and seed yield.

Treatment
Barvar-2 phosphate biofertilizere1
Outcome
Number of branches per plant, number of capsules per plant, number of seeds per capsule, seed oil percent and seed yielde1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect of Barvar-2 phosphate biofertilizer on Number of branches per plant, number of capsules per plant, number of seeds per capsule, seed oil percent and seed yield has been significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum seed yield with Barvar-2 biofertilizer was 1726.03 kg.ha-1.

Treatment
Barvar-2 phosphate biofertilizere0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1726.03 kg.ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum seed yield at 1726.03 kg.ha-1 was observed in Barvar-2 phosphate biofertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1067 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation disruption significantly affected height, branches, capsules, seeds per capsule, oil percentage and seed yield.

Treatment
irrigation disruptione0
Outcome
Plant height, number of branches per plant, number of capsules per plant, seed number per capsule, seed oil percent and seed yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“Effect of irrigation disruption on Plant height, number of branches per plant, number of capsules per plant, seed number per capsule, seed oil percent and seed yield has been significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-disrupted irrigation had the highest seed yield, 1985 kg.ha-1.

Treatment
control or non irrigation disruption treatmente0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1985 kg.ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest seed yield (1985 kg.ha-1) was observed in control or non irrigation disruption treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield under 10-leaf irrigation disruption did not differ significantly from the non-disruption control.

Treatment
irrigation disruption treatment at 10 leaf stagee0
Outcome
significant differencee0
Direction
did not showe0
Comparator
control or non irrigation disruption treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“control or non irrigation disruption treatment, which did not show significant difference with irrigation disruption treatment at 10 leaf stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering-stage irrigation disruption had the minimum seed yield, 1214 kg.ha-1.

Treatment
irrigation disruption treatment at flowering stagee0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
minimume0
Value
1214 kg.ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“The minimum seed yield was observed at 1214 kg.ha-1 in irrigation disruption treatment at flowering stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1681 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend disrupting irrigation at the 10-leaf stage to save water, especially in low-water areas.

Treatment
irrigation disruption treatment at 10 leaf stagee1
Outcome
irrigation disruption can be recommended at this stage of growthe0
Qualifier
especially in low water arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“In order to save water irrigation disruption can be recommended at this stage of growth, especially in low water areas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1574 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation disruption treatment at 10 leaf stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1453 · show in text ↑

stage · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 16 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

inoculation · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 33 positive, 1 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

irrigation · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 46 positive, 14 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.