Abstract
A comprehensive field experiment was conducted to study the “Various Impact of different sources of Liming materials on Growth, Yield and Productivity of the Maize crop Grown in Acid soil of Odisha ” in the village Bajpur, Haladia, Andharua, Mendhasal in khorda district of Odisha during Kharif, 2013.The soil was ameliorated with three different source sof liming materials (paper mill sludge @ 0.1LR, Stromatolyte @ 0.1 & 0.2 LR and Calcium Silicate @ 0.2 LR)added with soil test based dose with or without FYM. The FYM integrated treatments maintained higher chlorophyll content (SPAD values) than FYM untreated one. However use of liming materials did not influence the recorded chlorophyll content (SPAD values) much in the crop. The calcium silicate source applied @ 0.2 LR and the ST @ 0.2 LR when applied mixed with FYM recorded highest average growth rate of 3.9 cm day-1. Liming of soil and their combined application with FYM resulted in increasing root length, cob length, diameter and seed weight cob-1 respectively. Inorganic (Lime) amelioration of acid soil resulted in 32 per cent higher yield compared to the yield of 22 qha-1 due to inorganic nutrition only. Combining organic amelioration (FYM) with inorganic amelioration measure and inorganic nutrition yielded 26 per cent higher grain yield in maize crop. Irrespective of the sources, the stromatolyte @ 0.2LR mixed with FYM produced higher grain (39.3 q/ha) and stover (31.3 q/ha) yields with higher relative agronomic efficiency (234).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
FYM-integrated liming treatments maintained higher chlorophyll content than FYM-untreated treatments.
- Treatment
- FYM integrated treatmentse1
- Outcome
- chlorophyll content (SPAD values)e1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- FYM untreated onee1
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize crop”
e1“The FYM integrated treatments maintained higher chlorophyll content (SPAD values) than FYM untreated one”
Claim · model-written summary
Liming materials did not much influence maize chlorophyll content.
- Treatment
- use of liming materialse2
- Outcome
- chlorophyll content (SPAD values)e2
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize crop”
e2“However use of liming materials did not influence the recorded chlorophyll content (SPAD values) much in the crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Calcium silicate and stromatolyte at 0.2 LR mixed with FYM gave the highest average maize growth rate, 3.9 cm per day.
- Treatment
- calcium silicate source applied @ 0.2 LR and the ST @ 0.2 LR when applied mixed with FYMe3
- Outcome
- average growth ratee3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Value
- 3.9 cm day-1e3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize crop”
e3“The calcium silicate source applied @ 0.2 LR and the ST @ 0.2 LR when applied mixed with FYM recorded highest average growth rate of 3.9 cm day-1”
Claim · model-written summary
Liming of soil with FYM increased maize root length and cob length.
- Treatment
- Liming of soil and their combined application with FYMe4
- Outcome
- root length, cob lengthe4
- Direction
- increasinge4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize crop”
e4“Liming of soil and their combined application with FYM resulted in increasing root length, cob length, diameter and seed weight cob-1 respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Liming of soil with FYM increased maize cob diameter and seed weight per cob.
- Treatment
- Liming of soil and their combined application with FYMe4
- Outcome
- diameter and seed weight cob-1e4
- Direction
- increasinge4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize crop”
e4“Liming of soil and their combined application with FYM resulted in increasing root length, cob length, diameter and seed weight cob-1 respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Inorganic liming of acid soil gave 32% higher maize yield than inorganic nutrition only.
- Treatment
- Inorganic (Lime) amelioration of acid soile5
- Outcome
- yielde5
- Direction
- highere5
- Value
- 32 per cente5
- Qualifier
- 22 qha-1e5
- Comparator
- inorganic nutrition onlye5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize crop”
e5“Inorganic (Lime) amelioration of acid soil resulted in 32 per cent higher yield compared to the yield of 22 qha-1 due to inorganic nutrition only”
Claim · model-written summary
Combining FYM with inorganic liming and nutrition gave 26% higher maize grain yield.
- Treatment
- Combining organic amelioration (FYM) with inorganic amelioration measure and inorganic nutritione6
- Outcome
- grain yielde6
- Direction
- highere6
- Value
- 26 per cente6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“Combining organic amelioration (FYM) with inorganic amelioration measure and inorganic nutrition yielded 26 per cent higher grain yield in maize crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Stromatolyte at 0.2 LR mixed with FYM gave higher maize grain yield, 39.3 q/ha.
- Treatment
- the stromatolyte @ 0.2LR mixed with FYMe7
- Outcome
- graine7
- Direction
- highere7
- Value
- 39.3 q/hae7
- Qualifier
- Irrespective of the sourcese7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize crop”
e7“Irrespective of the sources, the stromatolyte @ 0.2LR mixed with FYM produced higher grain (39.3 q/ha) and stover (31.3 q/ha) yields with higher relative agronomic efficiency (234)”
Claim · model-written summary
Stromatolyte at 0.2 LR mixed with FYM gave higher maize stover yield, 31.3 q/ha.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize crop”
e7“Irrespective of the sources, the stromatolyte @ 0.2LR mixed with FYM produced higher grain (39.3 q/ha) and stover (31.3 q/ha) yields with higher relative agronomic efficiency (234)”
Claim · model-written summary
Stromatolyte at 0.2 LR mixed with FYM gave higher relative agronomic efficiency, 234.
- Treatment
- the stromatolyte @ 0.2LR mixed with FYMe7
- Outcome
- relative agronomic efficiencye7
- Direction
- highere7
- Value
- 234e7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize crop”
e7“Irrespective of the sources, the stromatolyte @ 0.2LR mixed with FYM produced higher grain (39.3 q/ha) and stover (31.3 q/ha) yields with higher relative agronomic efficiency (234)”
The same questions in other papers
calcium silicate · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
185 papers more in this group
See all 189 papers →lime · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
ph · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →fertilization · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
156 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
167 papers more in this group
See all 171 papers →lime · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
184 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
215 papers more in this group
See all 219 papers →fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
1,361 papers more in this group
See all 1,365 papers →fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
3,904 papers more in this group
See all 3,908 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.