Abstract
Abstract. The aim of research was to determine the protective effect of the microbiologi-cal material Trichoderma harzianum G 220 and Gliocladium fimbriatum S 151 and their post-culture liquids against soil-borne pathogenic fungi. The use of biological control im-proved the emergences, healthiness of pea plants and their yielding. Despite using the microbiological material for seed dressing, pea plants were infected by Altenaria alter-nata, Ascochyta pisi, Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium culmorum, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi, Fusarium solani, Phoma exigua, Pythium irregulare, Rhizoctonia solani and Scle-rotinia sclerotiorum.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Biological control improved pea emergence.
- Taxon
- pea
Lathyrus oleraceust0 - Treatment
- biological controle0
- Outcome
- emergencese0
- Direction
- im-provede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
e0“The use of biological control im-proved the emergences, healthiness of pea plants and their yielding.”
Claim · model-written summary
Biological control improved the health of pea plants.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- biological controle0
- Outcome
- healthiness of pea plantse0
- Direction
- im-provede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
e0“The use of biological control im-proved the emergences, healthiness of pea plants and their yielding.”
Claim · model-written summary
Biological control improved pea yield.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- biological controle0
- Outcome
- yieldinge0
- Direction
- im-provede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
e0“The use of biological control im-proved the emergences, healthiness of pea plants and their yielding.”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed dressed pea plants remained infected by several named fungi.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- microbiological material for seed dressinge0
- Outcome
- pea plants were infectede0
- Qualifier
- Altenaria alter-nata, Ascochyta pisi, Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium culmorum, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi, Fusarium solani, Phoma exigua, Pythium irregulare, Rhizoctonia solani and Scle-rotinia sclerotiorume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Despite using the microbiological material for seed dressing, pea plants were infected by Altenaria alter-nata, Ascochyta pisi, Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium culmorum, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi, Fusarium solani, Phoma exigua, Pythium irregulare, Rhizoctonia solani and Scle-rotinia sclerotiorum.”
The same questions in other papers
biocontrol · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.