Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at two different areas of the Instructional-Cum-Research (ICR) farm of the Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat in 2014-15 and 2015-16 to study the “quality attributes of pea and oat in an intercropping system in rice fallows as influenced by integrated nutrient management”. The treatments consist of four intercropping system viz. C1: sole oats, C2: sole pea, C3: 3:2 row proportions and C4: 3:3 row proportion of oat+pea intercropping and four integrated nutrient management Viz., F1: RDF (inorganics), F2: 50% N of RDF + 50% N through FYM, F3: 50 % N of RDF + 50% N through vermicompost and F4: 50%N through FYM + 50% N through vermicompost. Thus sixteen treatment combinations were laid out in split plot design with three replications with intercropping system in the main plots and INM in the sub-plots. The soils of the experimental site were acidic in reaction, sandy loam in texture, medium in OC, low in available N and P2O5 and medium in K2O.Intercropping of pea with oat could not out yield the sole pea in terms of crude protein content, crude protein yield, nutrient content and uptakes in both the years however among the intercropping system the highest crude protein content, crude protein yield, nutrient content and uptakes was recorded in 3:3 row proportions of pea+oat in both the years of experimentations. The crude protein content, crude protein yield, nutrient content and uptakes due to integrated nutrient management was found to be highest at 50% N of RDF + 50% N through vermicompost during the years of experimentation. The crude protein content of oat was not affected by intercropping system, however the highest crude protein content of 10.36 and 10.46% was recorded in 50% N of RDF + 50% N through vermicompost followed by 50% N of RDF + 50% N through FYM during 2014-15 and 2015-16, respectively. The higher crude protein yield was recorded in sole oats in both the years of experiment. Among the intercropping 3:2 gave the highest value of 3.84 and 4.43q/ha crude protein yield during 2014-15 and 2015-16, respectively. The N, P, K, Zn and Fe content of oats was found to be significantly higher in 3:3 row proportions of pea+oat intercropping over the sole cropping of oat however the nutrient uptakes were found to be highest in sole oat in both the years. Among the intercropping systems nutrient uptakes observed in C3 (3:2 row proportions) was higher than C4 (3:3 row proportions of pea+oat intercropping) in both the years of experimentation. Application of nutrients at 50% N of RDF + 50% N through vermicompost (F3) resulted significantly higher nutrient content and uptakes of oats as compared to F1 (100% RDF), F2 (50% N of RDF + 50% N through FYM) and F4 (100% organic i.e. 50% N of vermicompost + 50% N through vermicompost) in both the years. Therefore, in pea and oat intercropping system under rice fallows, it can be recommended to apply 50% RDF through vermicompost + 50% RDF through inorganic fertilizers, which will increase the nutrient content and uptake of the crops with 3:3 row proportions of pea+oat intercropping systems
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping pea with oat could not out-yield sole pea in crude protein content.
- Taxon
- pea
Lathyrus oleraceust0 - Treatment
- Intercropping of pea with oate0
- Outcome
- crude protein contente0
- Direction
- could not out yielde0
- Comparator
- sole peae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality attributes of pea and oat”
e0“Intercropping of pea with oat could not out yield the sole pea in terms of crude protein content, crude protein yield, nutrient content and uptakes in both the years”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping pea with oat could not out-yield sole pea in crude protein yield, nutrient content and uptakes.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- Intercropping of pea with oate0
- Outcome
- crude protein yield, nutrient content and uptakese0
- Direction
- could not out yielde0
- Comparator
- sole peae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality attributes of pea and oat”
e0“Intercropping of pea with oat could not out yield the sole pea in terms of crude protein content, crude protein yield, nutrient content and uptakes in both the years”
Claim · model-written summary
Among intercropping systems, the 3:3 row proportion gave the highest crude protein content.
- Taxon
- pea and oatLathyrus oleraceus
Avena sativat0 - Treatment
- 3:3 row proportions of pea+oate0
- Outcome
- crude protein contente0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- among the intercropping systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality attributes of pea and oat”
e0“among the intercropping system the highest crude protein content, crude protein yield, nutrient content and uptakes was recorded in 3:3 row proportions of pea+oat in both the years of experimentations”
Claim · model-written summary
Among intercropping systems, the 3:3 row proportion gave the highest crude protein yield, nutrient content and uptakes.
- Taxon
- pea and oatLathyrus oleraceusAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- 3:3 row proportions of pea+oate0
- Outcome
- crude protein yield, nutrient content and uptakese0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- among the intercropping systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality attributes of pea and oat”
e0“among the intercropping system the highest crude protein content, crude protein yield, nutrient content and uptakes was recorded in 3:3 row proportions of pea+oat in both the years of experimentations”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient management with 50% N from vermicompost gave the highest crude protein content, crude protein yield and nutrient content.
- Taxon
- pea and oatLathyrus oleraceusAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- 50% N of RDF + 50% N through vermicomposte0
- Outcome
- crude protein content, crude protein yield, nutrient contente0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality attributes of pea and oat”
e0“The crude protein content, crude protein yield, nutrient content and uptakes due to integrated nutrient management was found to be highest at 50% N of RDF + 50% N through vermicompost”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient management with 50% N from vermicompost gave the highest nutrient uptake.
- Taxon
- pea and oatLathyrus oleraceusAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- 50% N of RDF + 50% N through vermicomposte0
- Outcome
- uptakese0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality attributes of pea and oat”
e0“The crude protein content, crude protein yield, nutrient content and uptakes due to integrated nutrient management was found to be highest at 50% N of RDF + 50% N through vermicompost”
Claim · model-written summary
Crude protein content of oat was not affected by the intercropping system.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- intercropping systeme1
- Outcome
- crude protein content of oate1
- Direction
- not affectede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality attributes of pea and oat”
e1“The crude protein content of oat was not affected by intercropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
Crude protein content of oat was highest, at 10.36 and 10.46%, under 50% N of RDF with 50% N from vermicompost.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- 50% N of RDF + 50% N through vermicomposte2
- Outcome
- crude protein contente2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 10.36 and 10.46%e2
- Comparator
- 50% N of RDF + 50% N through FYMe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality attributes of pea and oat”
e2“the highest crude protein content of 10.36 and 10.46% was recorded in 50% N of RDF + 50% N through vermicompost followed by 50% N of RDF + 50% N through FYM”
Claim · model-written summary
Crude protein yield of oat was higher in sole oats.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- sole oatse3
- Outcome
- crude protein yielde3
- Direction
- highere3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality attributes of pea and oat”
e3“The higher crude protein yield was recorded in sole oats”
Claim · model-written summary
Among intercropping, the 3:2 row proportion gave the highest crude protein yield of oat, at 3.84 and 4.43 q/ha.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- intercropping 3:2e4
- Outcome
- crude protein yielde4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Value
- 3.84 and 4.43q/hae4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality attributes of pea and oat”
e4“Among the intercropping 3:2 gave the highest value of 3.84 and 4.43q/ha crude protein yield”
Claim · model-written summary
N, P and K content of oat was significantly higher in 3:3 pea+oat intercropping than in sole oat.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- 3:3 row proportions of pea+oat intercroppinge5
- Outcome
- N, P, Ke5
- Direction
- significantly highere5
- Comparator
- sole cropping of oate5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality attributes of pea and oat”
e5“The N, P, K, Zn and Fe content of oats was found to be significantly higher in 3:3 row proportions of pea+oat intercropping over the sole cropping of oat”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn and Fe content of oat was significantly higher in 3:3 pea+oat intercropping than in sole oat.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- 3:3 row proportions of pea+oat intercroppinge5
- Outcome
- Zn and Fe contente5
- Direction
- significantly highere5
- Comparator
- sole cropping of oate5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality attributes of pea and oat”
e5“The N, P, K, Zn and Fe content of oats was found to be significantly higher in 3:3 row proportions of pea+oat intercropping over the sole cropping of oat”
Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient uptake was highest in sole oat.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- sole oate6
- Outcome
- nutrient uptakese6
- Direction
- higheste6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality attributes of pea and oat”
e6“the nutrient uptakes were found to be highest in sole oat”
Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient uptake of oat was higher in the 3:2 row proportion than in the 3:3 row proportion.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- C3 (3:2 row proportions)e7
- Outcome
- nutrient uptakese7
- Direction
- highere7
- Comparator
- C4 (3:3 row proportions of pea+oat intercropping)e7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality attributes of pea and oat”
e7“Among the intercropping systems nutrient uptakes observed in C3 (3:2 row proportions) was higher than C4 (3:3 row proportions of pea+oat intercropping)”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying 50% N of RDF with 50% N from vermicompost significantly raised nutrient content and uptake of oat compared with inorganic-only and FYM treatments.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- 50% N of RDF + 50% N through vermicompost (F3)e7
- Outcome
- nutrient content and uptakese7
- Direction
- significantly highere7
- Comparator
- F1 (100% RDF)e7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality attributes of pea and oat”
e7“Application of nutrients at 50% N of RDF + 50% N through vermicompost (F3) resulted significantly higher nutrient content and uptakes of oats as compared to F1 (100% RDF)”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying 50% RDF through vermicompost and 50% through inorganic fertilizers is recommended with 3:3 pea+oat intercropping.
- Taxon
- pea and oatLathyrus oleraceusAvena sativat0
- Outcome
- apply 50% RDF through vermicompost + 50% RDF through inorganic fertilizerse6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality attributes of pea and oat”
e6“it can be recommended to apply 50% RDF through vermicompost + 50% RDF through inorganic fertilizers”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: protein · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →fertilization · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →intercropping · nutrient: content · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →intercropping · quality: protein · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →intercropping · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.