Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Response of Integrated Nutrient Management on Nutrient Uptake, Economics and Nutrient Status of Soil in Bold Seeded Summer Groundnut

F.G. Vala; P.M. Vaghasia; K.P. Zala; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during summer season of 2016 on clayey soil at College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh to study the “Integrated nutrient management in bold seeded summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”. The study comprised of ten treatments consisting of three different organic sources of nutrients and these organic sources were combined with 50 and75 per cent recommended dose of fertilizer. The results revealed that combined application of 75% RDF(18.75-37.50-37.50-15 kg N-P2O5-K2O-S ha-1) + 25% N through FYM (1.25 t/ha) + Biofertilizer (Rhizobium and PSM @ 10 ml kg-1 seed) recorded significantly higher pod and haulm yield with gross (₹ 102200 ha-1), net realizations (₹ 56582 ha-1), benefit: cost ratio (2.24) N, P, K and S content (4.56, 0.51, 0.60, 0.32% and 1.90, 0.31, 0.72, 0.26 %) and uptake (105.92, 11.80, 13.93, 7.36 kg ha-1 and 58.64, 9.44, 36.12, 8.09 kg ha-1) in pod and haulm, respectively and post-harvest N, P2O5 and S available status (255.00, 40.30 kg ha-1 and 30.63 mg kg-1, respectively) of soil which was closely followed by application of 75% RDF + 25% N through Vermicompost + Biofertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined fertilizer, manure and biofertilizer treatment produced significantly higher pod and haulm yield.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Treatment
75% RDF(18.75-37.50-37.50-15 kg N-P2O5-K2O-S ha-1) + 25% N through FYM (1.25 t/ha) + Biofertilizer (Rhizobium and PSM @ 10 ml kg-1 seed)e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
pod and haulm yielde0
Direction
significantly highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of 75% RDF(18.75-37.50-37.50-15 kg N-P2O5-K2O-S ha-1) + 25% N through FYM (1.25 t/ha) + Biofertilizer (Rhizobium and PSM @ 10 ml kg-1 seed) recorded significantly higher pod and haulm yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–671 · show in text ↑
e1

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–240 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment yielded gross returns of 102200 per hectare.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Outcome
grosse0
Value
₹ 102200 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gross (₹ 102200 ha-1), net realizations (₹ 56582 ha-1), benefit: cost ratio (2.24)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–759 · show in text ↑
e1

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–240 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment yielded net realizations of 56582 per hectare.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Outcome
net realizationse0
Value
₹ 56582 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gross (₹ 102200 ha-1), net realizations (₹ 56582 ha-1), benefit: cost ratio (2.24)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–759 · show in text ↑
e1

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–240 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment had a benefit to cost ratio of 2.24.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Value
2.24e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“benefit: cost ratio (2.24)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–759 · show in text ↑
e1

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment increased pod nutrient content and uptake.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Organ / stage
pode0
Outcome
N, P, K and S contente0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“recorded significantly higher pod and haulm yield with gross (₹ 102200 ha-1), net realizations (₹ 56582 ha-1), benefit: cost ratio (2.24) N, P, K and S content (4.56, 0.51, 0.60, 0.32% and 1.90, 0.31, 0.72, 0.26 %) and uptake (105.92, 11.80, 13.93, 7.36 kg ha-1 and 58.64, 9.44, 36.12, 8.09 kg ha-1) in pod and haulm, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–952 · show in text ↑
e1

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–240 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment was followed closely by vermicompost plus biofertilizer.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Treatment
75% RDF + 25% N through Vermicompost + Biofertilizere0
Outcome
closely followede0
Direction
closely followede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which was closely followed by application of 75% RDF + 25% N through Vermicompost + Biofertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1162 · show in text ↑
e1

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–240 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

58 papers: 56 positive, 2 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

inoculation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

221 papers: 198 positive, 23 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

217 papers more in this group

See all 221 papers →

fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

683 papers: 635 positive, 48 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

679 papers more in this group

See all 683 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.