Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Biochemical and yield responses of wheat genotypes to normal and heat stress condition

SB Amarshettiwar; PB Berad

13
claims
23
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The investigation was undertaken in the research field of wheat research unit, Dr. PDKV, Akola (M.S), during the Rabi season of 2014-15 and 2015-16. In order to study the biochemical and yield responses of wheat (Triticum aestivum and Triticum durum) at different dates of sowing, an experiment laid out in factorial randomized block design replicated thrice. The experiment comprised of two dates of sowing i.e. 17th November and 11th December with seven wheat genotypes namely AKAW-4627, AKDW-4021, AKAW-3722, AKW-1071, NIDW-295, AKAW-3997 and AKAW-4210-6. Among biochemical traits studied, Starch content in leaves was significantly reduced under late sown condition (2.93%) in comparison to normal sown condition (3.73%) at 60 DAS, The reduction in starch content was up to 21.46% due late sown condition at heading stage. Proline (µg g-1) at flag leaf stage was significantly increased under late sown condition (36.94) in comparison to normal sown condition (34.31). The per cent increase in proline content was up to 7.76% due late sown condition at flag leaf stage. There was reduction (5.78%) in MSI caused due to late sowing in wheat at anthesis stage. Among yield traits, reduction caused due to heat stress i.e. productive tillers-1 m2 (21.10%), Grain yield (g) spike-1 (10.07%) and Grain yield ha-1 (21.12%). Among wheat Genotypes AKAW-4210-6 proved superiority in yield i.e. 42.45 and 37.81 qt ha-1 respectively, under normal and heat stress condition. On the basis of yield stability index genotypes AKAW-4627 (0.90) found superior followed by AKAW-4210-6 (0.89) and AKAW-3722 (0.87).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing significantly reduced wheat leaf starch content at 60 DAS from 3.73% to 2.93%.

Treatment
late sown conditione0
Outcome
Starch content in leavese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
2.93%e0
Qualifier
3.73%e0
Comparator
normal sown conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Starch content in leaves was significantly reduced under late sown condition (2.93%) in comparison to normal sown condition (3.73%) at 60 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing reduced wheat starch content by 21.46% at heading.

Organ / stage
heading stagee0
Treatment
late sown conditione0
Outcome
starch contente0
Direction
reductione0
Value
21.46%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in starch content was up to 21.46% due late sown condition at heading stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing significantly increased wheat proline at flag leaf stage from 34.31 to 36.94 µg g-1.

Organ / stage
flag leaf stagee0
Treatment
late sown conditione0
Outcome
Prolinee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
36.94e0
Qualifier
34.31e0
Comparator
normal sown conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline (µg g-1) at flag leaf stage was significantly increased under late sown condition (36.94) in comparison to normal sown condition (34.31).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing increased wheat proline content by 7.76% at flag leaf stage.

Organ / stage
flag leaf stagee0
Treatment
late sown conditione0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
7.76%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The per cent increase in proline content was up to 7.76% due late sown condition at flag leaf stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing reduced wheat membrane stability index by 5.78% at anthesis.

Organ / stage
anthesis stagee0
Treatment
late sowinge0
Outcome
MSIe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
5.78%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was reduction (5.78%) in MSI caused due to late sowing in wheat at anthesis stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat stress reduced productive tillers per square metre by 21.10%.

Treatment
heat stresse0
Outcome
productive tillers-1 m2e0
Direction
reductione0
Value
21.10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among yield traits, reduction caused due to heat stress i.e. productive tillers-1 m2 (21.10%), Grain yield (g) spike-1 (10.07%) and Grain yield ha-1 (21.12%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biochemical and yield responses of wheat genotypes to normal and heat stress condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat stress reduced grain yield per spike by 10.07%.

Treatment
heat stresse0
Outcome
Grain yield (g) spike-1e0
Direction
reductione0
Value
10.07%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among yield traits, reduction caused due to heat stress i.e. productive tillers-1 m2 (21.10%), Grain yield (g) spike-1 (10.07%) and Grain yield ha-1 (21.12%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biochemical and yield responses of wheat genotypes to normal and heat stress condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat stress reduced grain yield per hectare by 21.12%.

Treatment
heat stresse0
Outcome
Grain yield ha-1e0
Direction
reductione0
Value
21.12%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among yield traits, reduction caused due to heat stress i.e. productive tillers-1 m2 (21.10%), Grain yield (g) spike-1 (10.07%) and Grain yield ha-1 (21.12%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biochemical and yield responses of wheat genotypes to normal and heat stress condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AKAW-4210-6 had superior yield under normal conditions, 42.45 qt ha-1.

Material
AKAW-4210-6e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
superioritye0
Value
42.45e0
Qualifier
normale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among wheat Genotypes AKAW-4210-6 proved superiority in yield i.e. 42.45 and 37.81 qt ha-1 respectively, under normal and heat stress condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1466 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AKAW-4210-6 had superior yield under heat stress, 37.81 qt ha-1.

Material
AKAW-4210-6e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
superioritye0
Value
37.81 qt ha-1e0
Qualifier
heat stress conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among wheat Genotypes AKAW-4210-6 proved superiority in yield i.e. 42.45 and 37.81 qt ha-1 respectively, under normal and heat stress condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1466 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AKAW-4627 had the highest yield stability index, 0.90.

Material
AKAW-4627e0
Outcome
yield stability indexe0
Direction
superiore0
Value
0.90e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the basis of yield stability index genotypes AKAW-4627 (0.90) found superior followed by AKAW-4210-6 (0.89) and AKAW-3722 (0.87).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1599 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biochemical and yield responses of wheat genotypes to normal and heat stress condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AKAW-4210-6 followed AKAW-4627 in yield stability index, at 0.89.

Material
AKAW-4210-6e0
Outcome
yield stability indexe0
Value
0.89e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the basis of yield stability index genotypes AKAW-4627 (0.90) found superior followed by AKAW-4210-6 (0.89) and AKAW-3722 (0.87).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1599 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biochemical and yield responses of wheat genotypes to normal and heat stress condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AKAW-3722 had yield stability index 0.87.

Material
AKAW-3722e0
Outcome
yield stability indexe0
Value
0.87e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the basis of yield stability index genotypes AKAW-4627 (0.90) found superior followed by AKAW-4210-6 (0.89) and AKAW-3722 (0.87).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1599 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biochemical and yield responses of wheat genotypes to normal and heat stress condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑

sowing time · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sowing time · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 2 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

heat · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

309 papers: 54 positive, 255 negative or no effect

254 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

305 papers more in this group

See all 309 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.