Abstract
The problem of late sowing of wheat is influenced by elevated atmospheric temperature during reproductive phase. The present paper studies the effects of late sown condition on various biochemical and yield attributes at pre- and post anthesis stages, in two wheat genotypes i.e., HUW-468 (high temperature sensitive) and HUW-510 (high temperature resistant). The three dates of sowing (DOS) were November 20th (DOS I), December 10th (DOS II) and December 30th (DOS III). Late or very late sowing induced a significant decline in total sugar content, total protein content, proline content, chlorophyll content and membrane thermostability in HUW-468 as compared to HUW-510, particularly at postanthesis under late sown than normal sown condition. Significant differences were observed among both the genotypes for the number of ears per 20 cm row length, spikelet per ear, number of grain per ear, test weight (g), yield per plant and harvest index in all the dates of sowing. Normal sowing date showed higher grain yield as compared to other dates of sowing in both the genotypes.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Late sowing significantly lowered total sugar content in HUW-468 relative to HUW-510, especially after anthesis.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- HUW-468e0
- Organ / stage
- postanthesise0
- Treatment
- Late or very late sowinge0
- Outcome
- total sugar contente0
- Direction
- declinee0
- Comparator
- HUW-510e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”
e0“Late or very late sowing induced a significant decline in total sugar content, total protein content, proline content, chlorophyll content and membrane thermostability in HUW-468 as compared to HUW-510, particularly at postanthesis under late sown than normal sown condition.”
Claim · model-written summary
Late sowing significantly lowered total protein content in HUW-468 relative to HUW-510, especially after anthesis.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- HUW-468e0
- Organ / stage
- postanthesise0
- Treatment
- Late or very late sowinge0
- Outcome
- total protein contente0
- Direction
- declinee0
- Comparator
- HUW-510e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”
e0“Late or very late sowing induced a significant decline in total sugar content, total protein content, proline content, chlorophyll content and membrane thermostability in HUW-468 as compared to HUW-510, particularly at postanthesis under late sown than normal sown condition.”
Claim · model-written summary
Late sowing significantly lowered proline content in HUW-468 relative to HUW-510, especially after anthesis.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- HUW-468e0
- Organ / stage
- postanthesise0
- Treatment
- Late or very late sowinge0
- Outcome
- proline contente0
- Direction
- declinee0
- Comparator
- HUW-510e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”
e0“Late or very late sowing induced a significant decline in total sugar content, total protein content, proline content, chlorophyll content and membrane thermostability in HUW-468 as compared to HUW-510, particularly at postanthesis under late sown than normal sown condition.”
Claim · model-written summary
Late sowing significantly lowered chlorophyll content in HUW-468 relative to HUW-510, especially after anthesis.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- HUW-468e0
- Organ / stage
- postanthesise0
- Treatment
- Late or very late sowinge0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- declinee0
- Comparator
- HUW-510e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”
e0“Late or very late sowing induced a significant decline in total sugar content, total protein content, proline content, chlorophyll content and membrane thermostability in HUW-468 as compared to HUW-510, particularly at postanthesis under late sown than normal sown condition.”
Claim · model-written summary
Late sowing significantly lowered membrane thermostability in HUW-468 relative to HUW-510, especially after anthesis.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- HUW-468e0
- Organ / stage
- postanthesise0
- Treatment
- Late or very late sowinge0
- Outcome
- membrane thermostabilitye0
- Direction
- declinee0
- Comparator
- HUW-510e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”
e0“Late or very late sowing induced a significant decline in total sugar content, total protein content, proline content, chlorophyll content and membrane thermostability in HUW-468 as compared to HUW-510, particularly at postanthesis under late sown than normal sown condition.”
Claim · model-written summary
The two wheat genotypes differed significantly in number of ears per 20 cm row length across sowing dates.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- number of ears per 20 cm row lengthe0
- Qualifier
- in all the dates of sowinge0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”
e0“Significant differences were observed among both the genotypes for the number of ears per 20 cm row length, spikelet per ear, number of grain per ear, test weight (g), yield per plant and harvest index in all the dates of sowing.”
Claim · model-written summary
The two wheat genotypes differed significantly in spikelet per ear across sowing dates.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- spikelet per eare0
- Qualifier
- in all the dates of sowinge0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”
e0“Significant differences were observed among both the genotypes for the number of ears per 20 cm row length, spikelet per ear, number of grain per ear, test weight (g), yield per plant and harvest index in all the dates of sowing.”
Claim · model-written summary
The two wheat genotypes differed significantly in number of grain per ear across sowing dates.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- number of grain per eare0
- Qualifier
- in all the dates of sowinge0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”
e0“Significant differences were observed among both the genotypes for the number of ears per 20 cm row length, spikelet per ear, number of grain per ear, test weight (g), yield per plant and harvest index in all the dates of sowing.”
Claim · model-written summary
The two wheat genotypes differed significantly in test weight (g) across sowing dates.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- test weight (g)e0
- Qualifier
- in all the dates of sowinge0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”
e0“Significant differences were observed among both the genotypes for the number of ears per 20 cm row length, spikelet per ear, number of grain per ear, test weight (g), yield per plant and harvest index in all the dates of sowing.”
Claim · model-written summary
The two wheat genotypes differed significantly in yield per plant across sowing dates.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- yield per plante0
- Qualifier
- in all the dates of sowinge0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”
e0“Significant differences were observed among both the genotypes for the number of ears per 20 cm row length, spikelet per ear, number of grain per ear, test weight (g), yield per plant and harvest index in all the dates of sowing.”
Claim · model-written summary
The two wheat genotypes differed significantly in harvest index across sowing dates.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- harvest indexe0
- Qualifier
- in all the dates of sowinge0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”
e0“Significant differences were observed among both the genotypes for the number of ears per 20 cm row length, spikelet per ear, number of grain per ear, test weight (g), yield per plant and harvest index in all the dates of sowing.”
Claim · model-written summary
Normal sowing produced higher grain yield than other sowing dates in both wheat genotypes.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Normal sowing datee0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- other dates of sowinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”
e0“Normal sowing date showed higher grain yield as compared to other dates of sowing in both the genotypes.”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →sowing time · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →sowing time · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →sowing time · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
39 papers more in this group
See all 43 papers →sowing time · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
265 papers in the same direction as this paper · 191 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
458 papers more in this group
See all 462 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.