Paper · 2011 · Mailei zuowu xuebao

Effect of Suitable Late Sowing on Photosynthetic Performance of Weak Spring Wheat during Grain Filling Stage

Nian Li

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To understand the effects of late sowing on photosynthetic performance of flag leaves during grain filling stage,the weak spring wheat varieties Zhengmai 9023(strong gluten),Yanzhan4110(middle gluten) and Yumai 50(weak gluten) were used as materials and sowed at different date.The result indicated that the grain yield of Zhengmai 9023 at late sowing was 8.26% lower than that at sowing on time and 4.68% higher than that at early sowing;The grain yield in average of Yanzhan4110 and Yumai 50 at late sowing were 14.38%,18.55% higher than that at sowing on time and early sowing.The leaf area index of each varieties at late sowing had no difference with that sowing on time during grain filling stage,but that of them were significantly higher than that at early sowing,with an average of 12.7%;The chlorophyll content of Zhengmai 9023 and Yanzhan4110 at late sowing were higher than that at sowing on time and early sowing,especially at 14 days after anthesis;The net photosynthetic rate of Zhengmai 9023 at late sowing was the highest all over the grain filling stage,that of Yanzhan4110 at late sowing was significantly higher than that sowing on time and early sowing at 21 days after anthesis,and for Yumai 50 was at 0~7 days after anthesis.The late sowing for the three varieties have advantage on net photosynthetic rate too.Thus,suitable late sowing can maintain better photosynthetic performance of weak spring wheat during the grain filling stage and can improve their yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing reduced Zhengmai 9023 grain yield by 8.26% against on-time sowing.

Material
Zhengmai 9023e0
Treatment
late sowinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
8.26%e0
Comparator
sowing on timee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the grain yield of Zhengmai 9023 at late sowing was 8.26% lower than that at sowing on time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–395 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing raised Zhengmai 9023 yield by 4.68% against early sowing.

Material
Zhengmai 9023e0
Treatment
late sowinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.68%e0
Comparator
early sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the grain yield of Zhengmai 9023 at late sowing was 8.26% lower than that at sowing on time and 4.68% higher than that at early sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–438 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yanzhan4110 and Yumai 50 averaged 14.38% higher yield with late versus on-time sowing.

Material
Yanzhan4110 and Yumai 50e0
Treatment
late sowinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
14.38%e0
Comparator
sowing on timee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield in average of Yanzhan4110 and Yumai 50 at late sowing were 14.38%,18.55% higher than that at sowing on time and early sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–579 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yanzhan4110 and Yumai 50 averaged 18.55% higher yield with late versus early sowing.

Material
Yanzhan4110 and Yumai 50e0
Treatment
late sowinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
18.55%e0
Comparator
early sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield in average of Yanzhan4110 and Yumai 50 at late sowing were 14.38%,18.55% higher than that at sowing on time and early sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–579 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late and on-time sowing did not differ in grain-filling leaf area index across varieties.

Organ / stage
grain filling stagee0
Treatment
late sowinge0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
no differencee0
Comparator
sowing on timee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf area index of each varieties at late sowing had no difference with that sowing on time during grain filling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–702 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing gave a 12.7% higher leaf area index than early sowing.

Treatment
late sowinge0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
highere0
Value
12.7%e0
Comparator
early sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf area index of each varieties at late sowing had no difference with that sowing on time during grain filling stage,but that of them were significantly higher than that at early sowing,with an average of 12.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing raised chlorophyll content of Zhengmai 9023 over on-time and early sowing.

Material
Zhengmai 9023e0
Treatment
late sowinge0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
14 days after anthesise0
Comparator
sowing on time and early sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll content of Zhengmai 9023 and Yanzhan4110 at late sowing were higher than that at sowing on time and early sowing,especially at 14 days after anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing raised chlorophyll content of Yanzhan4110 over on-time and early sowing.

Material
Yanzhan4110e0
Treatment
late sowinge0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
14 days after anthesise0
Comparator
sowing on time and early sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll content of Zhengmai 9023 and Yanzhan4110 at late sowing were higher than that at sowing on time and early sowing,especially at 14 days after anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zhengmai 9023 at late sowing had the highest net photosynthetic rate across grain filling.

Material
Zhengmai 9023e0
Organ / stage
grain filling stagee0
Treatment
late sowinge0
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The net photosynthetic rate of Zhengmai 9023 at late sowing was the highest all over the grain filling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yanzhan4110 late sowing raised net photosynthetic rate at 21 days after anthesis.

Material
Yanzhan4110e0
Treatment
late sowinge0
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
21 days after anthesise0
Comparator
sowing on time and early sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The net photosynthetic rate of Zhengmai 9023 at late sowing was the highest all over the grain filling stage,that of Yanzhan4110 at late sowing was significantly higher than that sowing on time and early sowing at 21 days after anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1199 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yumai 50 late sowing raised net photosynthetic rate at 0~7 days after anthesis.

Material
Yumai 50e0
Treatment
late sowinge0
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee0
Qualifier
0~7 days after anthesise0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The net photosynthetic rate of Zhengmai 9023 at late sowing was the highest all over the grain filling stage,that of Yanzhan4110 at late sowing was significantly higher than that sowing on time and early sowing at 21 days after anthesis,and for Yumai 50 was at 0~7 days after anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑

sowing time · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

sowing time · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 5 positive, 11 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

sowing time · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

113 papers: 65 positive, 48 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

sowing time · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

462 papers: 266 positive, 196 negative or no effect

265 papers in the same direction as this paper · 191 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

458 papers more in this group

See all 462 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.