Paper · 2021 · Turkish Journal Of Field Crops

LATE SOWING AND NITROGEN APPLICATION TO OPTIMIZE CANOPY STRUCTURE AND GRAIN YIELD OF BREAD WHEAT IN A FLUCTUATING CLIMATE

Jia Cheng ZHENG; Zhang HONG; Yu JİE; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Adjustment of sowing date and nitrogen (N) use help alleviate farmland contradiction under fluctuating climate in Jianghuai region of China. In this study, two wheat varieties were used to study the interactive effect between two sowing dates and two basal to topdressing ratios of N fertilizer, each treatment of eight combinations arranged in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications was conducted in two consecutive growth seasons of bread wheat. As results of two years of investigation, wheat plants with an excessively delayed sowing date showed a significant reduction in flag leaf angle, flag leaf area, main stem spike length and photosynthesis rate, yet a increased basic seedling number and transpiration rate, which corresponded to a notable loss in thousand kernel weight and grain yield. An increase in the proportion of topdressed N led to an increase in flag leaf angle and leaf area index, and a lower spike number per unit and thousand kernel weight, to indicate a loss of grain yield. These findings suggest that excessively delayed sowing date and high N topdressing ratios severely affected the canopy structure and thousand kernel weight of bread wheat, and subsequently reduced grain yield. Based on membership function analysis, a sowing date of 25 October coupled with the N topdressing ratio of 7:3 (the basal to topdressing ratios of N fertilizer) was the ideal combination to optimize the wheat industry in Jianghuai region of China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

excessively delayed sowing date changed flag leaf angle, flag leaf area, main stem spike length.

Taxon
BREAD WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
excessively delayed sowing datee0
Outcome
flag leaf angle, flag leaf area, main stem spike lengthe0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BREAD WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“wheat plants with an excessively delayed sowing date showed a significant reduction in flag leaf angle, flag leaf area, main stem spike length and photosynthesis rate, yet a increased basic seedling number and transpiration rate, which corresponded to a notable loss in thousand kernel weight and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

excessively delayed sowing date changed photosynthesis rate.

Taxon
BREAD WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
excessively delayed sowing datee0
Outcome
photosynthesis ratee0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BREAD WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“wheat plants with an excessively delayed sowing date showed a significant reduction in flag leaf angle, flag leaf area, main stem spike length and photosynthesis rate, yet a increased basic seedling number and transpiration rate, which corresponded to a notable loss in thousand kernel weight and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

excessively delayed sowing date changed basic seedling number.

Taxon
BREAD WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
excessively delayed sowing datee0
Outcome
basic seedling numbere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BREAD WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“wheat plants with an excessively delayed sowing date showed a significant reduction in flag leaf angle, flag leaf area, main stem spike length and photosynthesis rate, yet a increased basic seedling number and transpiration rate, which corresponded to a notable loss in thousand kernel weight and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

excessively delayed sowing date changed transpiration rate.

Taxon
BREAD WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
excessively delayed sowing datee0
Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BREAD WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“wheat plants with an excessively delayed sowing date showed a significant reduction in flag leaf angle, flag leaf area, main stem spike length and photosynthesis rate, yet a increased basic seedling number and transpiration rate, which corresponded to a notable loss in thousand kernel weight and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

excessively delayed sowing date changed thousand kernel weight and grain yield.

Taxon
BREAD WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
excessively delayed sowing datee0
Outcome
thousand kernel weight and grain yielde0
Direction
losse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BREAD WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“wheat plants with an excessively delayed sowing date showed a significant reduction in flag leaf angle, flag leaf area, main stem spike length and photosynthesis rate, yet a increased basic seedling number and transpiration rate, which corresponded to a notable loss in thousand kernel weight and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

increase in the proportion of topdressed N changed flag leaf angle and leaf area index.

Taxon
BREAD WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increase in the proportion of topdressed Ne0
Outcome
flag leaf angle and leaf area indexe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BREAD WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“An increase in the proportion of topdressed N led to an increase in flag leaf angle and leaf area index, and a lower spike number per unit and thousand kernel weight, to indicate a loss of grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

increase in the proportion of topdressed N changed spike number per unit and thousand kernel weight.

Taxon
BREAD WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increase in the proportion of topdressed Ne0
Outcome
spike number per unit and thousand kernel weighte0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BREAD WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“An increase in the proportion of topdressed N led to an increase in flag leaf angle and leaf area index, and a lower spike number per unit and thousand kernel weight, to indicate a loss of grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

increase in the proportion of topdressed N changed grain yield.

Taxon
BREAD WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increase in the proportion of topdressed Ne0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
losse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BREAD WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“An increase in the proportion of topdressed N led to an increase in flag leaf angle and leaf area index, and a lower spike number per unit and thousand kernel weight, to indicate a loss of grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–1025 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify 25 October sowing with a 7:3 basal to topdressing N ratio as the ideal combination.

Taxon
BREAD WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
a sowing date of 25 October coupled with the N topdressing ratio of 7:3e0
Setting
Jianghuai region of Chinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BREAD WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“a sowing date of 25 October coupled with the N topdressing ratio of 7:3 (the basal to topdressing ratios of N fertilizer) was the ideal combination to optimize the wheat industry in Jianghuai region of China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1483 · show in text ↑

sowing time · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

sowing time · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

462 papers: 266 positive, 196 negative or no effect

195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 266 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

458 papers more in this group

See all 462 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.