Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Physiological and Proteomic Analyses Indicate Delayed Sowing Improves Photosynthetic Capacity in Wheat Flag Leaves Under Heat Stress

Liwei Fei; Jinpeng Chu; Xiu Zhang; et al.

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Background and Aims: Climate warming has become an indisputable fact, and wheat is among the most heat-sensitive cereal crops. Heat stress during grain filling threatens global wheat production and food security. Here, we analyzed the physiological and proteomic changes by delayed sowing on the photosynthetic capacity of winter wheat leaves under heat stress. Our aim is to provide a new cultivation way for the heat stress resistance in wheat. Methods: Through 2 years field experiment and an open warming simulation system, we compared the changes in wheat grain weight, yield, photosynthetic rate, and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters under heat stress at late grain-filling stage during normal sowing and delayed sowing. At the same time, based on the iTRAQ proteomics, we compared the changes of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) during the two sowing periods under high temperature stress. Key Results: In our study, compared with normal sowing, delayed sowing resulted in a significantly higher photosynthetic rate during the grain-filling stage under heat stress, as well as significantly increased grain weight and yield at maturity. The chlorophyll a fluorescence transient (OJIP) analysis showed that delayed sowing significantly reduced the J-step and I-step. Moreover, OJIP parameters, including RC/CSm, TRo/CSm, ETo/CSm, DIo/CSm and ΦPo, ψo, ΦEo, were significantly increased; DIo/CSm and ΦDo, were significantly reduced. GO biological process and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses showed that, among DEPs, proteins involved in photosynthetic electron transport were significantly increased and among photosynthetic metabolic pathways, we have observed upregulated proteins, such as PsbH, PsbR, and PetB. Conclusion: Physiological and proteomic analyses indicate delaying the sowing date of winter wheat reduced heat dissipation by enhancing the scavenging capacity of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in flag leaves, and ensuring energy transmission along the photosynthetic electron transport chain; this increased the distribution ratio of available energy in photochemical reactions and maintained a high photosynthetic system assimilation capacity, which supported a high photosynthetic rate. Hence, delayed sowing may represent a new cultivation strategy for promoting heat stress tolerance in winter wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing gave a significantly higher photosynthetic rate than normal sowing during the grain-filling stage under heat stress.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
grain-filling stagee1
Treatment
delayed sowinge1
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
under heat stresse1
Comparator
normal sowinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic capacity of winter wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–342 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with normal sowing, delayed sowing resulted in a significantly higher photosynthetic rate during the grain-filling stage under heat stress, as well as significantly increased grain weight and yield at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing significantly increased grain weight and yield at maturity compared with normal sowing.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
delayed sowinge1
Outcome
grain weight and yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
normal sowinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic capacity of winter wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–342 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with normal sowing, delayed sowing resulted in a significantly higher photosynthetic rate during the grain-filling stage under heat stress, as well as significantly increased grain weight and yield at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing significantly reduced the J-step and I-step of the chlorophyll a fluorescence transient (OJIP).

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
delayed sowinge2
Outcome
J-step and I-stepe2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic capacity of winter wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–342 · show in text ↑
e2

“The chlorophyll a fluorescence transient (OJIP) analysis showed that delayed sowing significantly reduced the J-step and I-step”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

OJIP parameters RC/CSm, TRo/CSm and ETo/CSm were significantly increased under delayed sowing.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
delayed sowinge2
Outcome
RC/CSm, TRo/CSm, ETo/CSme3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic capacity of winter wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–342 · show in text ↑
e2

“The chlorophyll a fluorescence transient (OJIP) analysis showed that delayed sowing significantly reduced the J-step and I-step”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1282 · show in text ↑
e3

“OJIP parameters, including RC/CSm, TRo/CSm, ETo/CSm, DIo/CSm and ΦPo, ψo, ΦEo, were significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

OJIP parameters ΦPo, ψo and ΦEo were significantly increased under delayed sowing.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
delayed sowinge2
Outcome
ΦPo, ψo, ΦEoe3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic capacity of winter wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–342 · show in text ↑
e2

“The chlorophyll a fluorescence transient (OJIP) analysis showed that delayed sowing significantly reduced the J-step and I-step”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1282 · show in text ↑
e3

“OJIP parameters, including RC/CSm, TRo/CSm, ETo/CSm, DIo/CSm and ΦPo, ψo, ΦEo, were significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

OJIP parameter DIo/CSm was significantly increased under delayed sowing, as listed in the abstract.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
delayed sowinge2
Outcome
DIo/CSme3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic capacity of winter wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–342 · show in text ↑
e2

“The chlorophyll a fluorescence transient (OJIP) analysis showed that delayed sowing significantly reduced the J-step and I-step”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1282 · show in text ↑
e3

“OJIP parameters, including RC/CSm, TRo/CSm, ETo/CSm, DIo/CSm and ΦPo, ψo, ΦEo, were significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

OJIP parameters DIo/CSm and ΦDo were significantly reduced under delayed sowing.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
delayed sowinge2
Outcome
DIo/CSm and ΦDoe4
Direction
reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic capacity of winter wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–342 · show in text ↑
e2

“The chlorophyll a fluorescence transient (OJIP) analysis showed that delayed sowing significantly reduced the J-step and I-step”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1282 · show in text ↑
e4

“DIo/CSm and ΦDo, were significantly reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Among differentially expressed proteins, proteins involved in photosynthetic electron transport were significantly increased under delayed sowing.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
delayed sowinge2
Outcome
proteins involved in photosynthetic electron transporte5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic capacity of winter wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–342 · show in text ↑
e2

“The chlorophyll a fluorescence transient (OJIP) analysis showed that delayed sowing significantly reduced the J-step and I-step”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1282 · show in text ↑
e5

“GO biological process and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses showed that, among DEPs, proteins involved in photosynthetic electron transport were significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1615 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Upregulated proteins in flag leaves of winter wheat included PsbH, PsbR and PetB.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Gene
PsbH, PsbR, and PetBe6
Outcome
upregulated proteinse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic capacity of winter wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–342 · show in text ↑
e6

“we have observed upregulated proteins, such as PsbH, PsbR, and PetB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1661–1728 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying the sowing date reduced heat dissipation by enhancing the scavenging capacity of reactive oxygen species in flag leaves.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume7
Treatment
delaying the sowing datee7
Outcome
heat dissipatione7
Qualifier
enhancing the scavenging capacity of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in flag leavese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“delaying the sowing date of winter wheat reduced heat dissipation by enhancing the scavenging capacity of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in flag leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1788–1938 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing may be a new cultivation strategy for promoting heat stress tolerance in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume7
Outcome
heat stress tolerancee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“delayed sowing may represent a new cultivation strategy for promoting heat stress tolerance in winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2227–2334 · show in text ↑

sowing time · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

sowing time · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

462 papers: 266 positive, 196 negative or no effect

265 papers in the same direction as this paper · 191 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

458 papers more in this group

See all 462 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.