Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Late sowing significantly lowered total protein content in HUW-468 relative to HUW-510, especially after anthesis.

A claim from Response of biochemical, yield and yield components of wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) genotypes as affected by different sowing dates · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing significantly lowered total protein content in HUW-468 relative to HUW-510, especially after anthesis.

Material
HUW-468e0
Organ / stage
postanthesise0
Treatment
Late or very late sowinge0
Outcome
total protein contente0
Direction
declinee0
Comparator
HUW-510e0

Not reportedGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–82
e0

“Late or very late sowing induced a significant decline in total sugar content, total protein content, proline content, chlorophyll content and membrane thermostability in HUW-468 as compared to HUW-510, particularly at postanthesis under late sown than normal sown condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–747

Title

Response of biochemical, yield and yield components of wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) genotypes as affected by different sowing dates

Pratap Singh; Padmanabh Dwivedi; J. P. Srivastava Vegetos 2014. doi:10.5958/j.2229-4473.27.1.024

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-91862d263659996133db098515e1be64982af6ca9f827731a66a4e71341475c7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

sowing time · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 31 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.