Paper · 1987 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Effect of time of sowing on grain yield, and nutrient uptake of wheats with contrasting phenology

GD Batten; MA Khan

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
41
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Four wheat genotypes with varying vernalisation and daylength requirements were sown in the field on 5 occasions between early April and late June at Wagga Wagga and Temora, New South Wales, in 1974 and 1975. The period between sowing and heading decreased from 1068-1 324 degree-days (base temperature = 4¦C) for crops sown in April to 660-841 degree-days for crops sown in late May. The genotype with the largest vernalisation response in this study (WW33G) produced the highest yields when crops were sown in early April. The cultivar Oxley, which has a small vernalisation response, produced the highest yields at almost all other sowing times. Shoot nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) uptake did not vary consistently in relation to the time of sowing. Grain protein concentration was higher at 3 of 4 sites with early sowing and grain P concentration was always significantly higher with early sowing dates. Higher concentrations of P were associated with higher concentrations of phytate. The concentrations of N and P were negatively correlated with yield and harvest index.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Time from sowing to heading declined from April to late May sowing.

Treatment
crops sown in late Maye0
Outcome
period between sowing and headinge0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
660-841 degree-dayse0
Qualifier
1068-1 324 degree-dayse0
Comparator
crops sown in Aprile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The period between sowing and heading decreased from 1068-1 324 degree-days (base temperature = 4¦C) for crops sown in April to 660-841 degree-days for crops sown in late May”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–383 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WW33G had the highest yields with early April sowing.

Material
WW33Ge0
Treatment
crops were sown in early Aprile0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genotype with the largest vernalisation response in this study (WW33G) produced the highest yields when crops were sown in early April”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–523 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxley yielded highest at almost all other sowing times.

Material
Oxleye0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
almost all other sowing timese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar Oxley, which has a small vernalisation response, produced the highest yields at almost all other sowing times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–647 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot nitrogen and phosphorus uptake showed no consistent relation to sowing time.

Treatment
time of sowinge0
Outcome
Shoot nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) uptakee0
Direction
did not vary consistentlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) uptake did not vary consistently in relation to the time of sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing increased grain protein concentration at three of four sites.

Treatment
early sowinge0
Outcome
Grain protein concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
3 of 4 sitese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain protein concentration was higher at 3 of 4 sites with early sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing significantly increased grain phosphorus concentration.

Treatment
early sowing datese0
Outcome
grain P concentratione0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain P concentration was always significantly higher with early sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher phosphorus concentration was associated with higher phytate concentration.

Compound
Pe0
Outcome
concentrations of phytatee0
Direction
Highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher concentrations of P were associated with higher concentrations of phytate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations correlated negatively with yield and harvest index.

Compound
N and Pe0
Outcome
yield and harvest indexe0
Direction
negatively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentrations of N and P were negatively correlated with yield and harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑

sowing time · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 15 positive, 9 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

sowing time · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 31 positive, 12 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.