Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Late sowing significantly lowered total sugar content in HUW-468 relative to HUW-510, especially after anthesis.

A claim from Response of biochemical, yield and yield components of wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) genotypes as affected by different sowing dates · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing significantly lowered total sugar content in HUW-468 relative to HUW-510, especially after anthesis.

Material
HUW-468e0
Organ / stage
postanthesise0
Treatment
Late or very late sowinge0
Outcome
total sugar contente0
Direction
declinee0
Comparator
HUW-510e0

Not reportedGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–82
e0

“Late or very late sowing induced a significant decline in total sugar content, total protein content, proline content, chlorophyll content and membrane thermostability in HUW-468 as compared to HUW-510, particularly at postanthesis under late sown than normal sown condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–747

Title

Response of biochemical, yield and yield components of wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) genotypes as affected by different sowing dates

Pratap Singh; Padmanabh Dwivedi; J. P. Srivastava Vegetos 2014. doi:10.5958/j.2229-4473.27.1.024

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-bc33763fceeaa7065fe40afb4385a20e69bfaed2bdcb0c19f27f6360885e4df3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

sowing time · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 2 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Timely sowing increased starch content compared with very late sowing, with reported increases of about 7% and 11.6%.

    Delayed sowing and its ramifications: biophysical, yield and quality analysis of wheat cultivars in the northwest Indo‐Gangetic plains · 2024 · compared with very late-sown treatment

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Late sowing increased the amylose-amylopectin ratio.

    Correlationship between yield of wheat and temperature during development of grain under late sown condition. · 2010

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Late sowing caused premature cessation of starch deposition in PBW 521 and PBW 522.

    Genotypic Variation for High Temperature Tolerance in Relation to Carbon Partitioning and Grain Sink Activity in Wheat · 2012

    Same direction

  4. no effect
    Delayed sowing had little effect on wheat starch crystalline morphology.

    Structural and physicochemical effects on the starch quality of the high-quality wheat genotype caused by delayed sowing · 2024

    Same direction

  5. negative
    Delayed sowing adversely affected wheat carbohydrate %.

    Effect of sowing date on yield and yield components of bread wheat cultivars under environmental conditions of Sohag region · 2016

    Same direction

  6. negative
    Late sowing significantly adversely affected wheat agronomic and physiological traits and grain carbohydrate content.

    Evaluation of some bread wheat genotypes for heat tolerance under terminal heat stress conditions · 2022

    Same direction

  7. negative
    Delayed sowing reduced grain starch.

    Regulating Effect of Delayed Sowing Date on Yield Formation and Grain Quality of Winter Wheat · 2013

    Same direction

  8. negative
    Late sowing significantly reduced wheat leaf starch content at 60 DAS from 3.73% to 2.93%.

    Biochemical and yield responses of wheat genotypes to normal and heat stress condition · 2018 · compared with normal sown condition

    Same direction

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.