Paper · 2024 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Late‐sown stress afflict post‐anthesis dry matter and nutrient partitioning and their remobilization in aestivum wheat genotypes

R. Rustum Zhiipao; Vijay Pooniya; Dinesh Kumar; et al.

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Timely sowing of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) is a crucial agronomic measure to realize its genetic yield potential, particularly under ever‐changing climatic conditions. The present study appraised the genotypic variations of wheat genotypes for dry matter and nutrients' accumulation, partitioning, remobilization and stress indices under timely and late sown conditions of irrigated semi‐arid ecology. Five potential wheat genotypes viz. HD‐2967, HD‐3086, HD‐3249, DBW‐187 and HD‐3226 were evaluated under field conditions, however, the studies for root‐system traits were made in PVC tubes. Timely sown wheat had grain yield advantage of 18%, and genotypes DBW‐187 (5.77 t ha −1 ) and HD‐2967 (4.78 t ha −1 ) produced the highest grain yield under the timely and late sown conditions respectively. The days (d) to anthesis and grain filling period under the late sown was hastened by 5.2 d, and shortened by 7.4 d. Timely sowing enhanced the post‐anthesis dry matter accumulation and remobilization to the tune of 18.8% and 23% respectively. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium accumulated post‐anthesis and their remobilization under the timely sown was significantly greater than the late sown, while the contribution of remobilization to grain content was higher under the late sown except for the nitrogen. The canopy temperature was cooler by 2°C under the timely sown, while the canopy temperature depression was greater by 0.8–1.04°C, at anthesis and dough stages of the crop. The leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD meter value) at anthesis and dough stages improved by 10% and 7.6% due to timely sowing. The genotypes HD‐2967 and HD‐3249 had relatively greater geometric mean productivity and stress tolerance index coupled with a comparatively higher yield stability index. Further, the root‐system traits, that is, total root length (TRL), root biomass and root length density (RLD) were significantly superior both at 50 DAS (days after sowing) and at anthesis under the timely sown compared to the late sown. This study clearly outlined that timely sowing of wheat resulted in higher post‐anthesis dry matter accumulation, nutrient acquisition and remobilization along with improved root‐system traits and grain yield. Screening of the genotypes, based on stress indices would result in a better understanding of the genotypic performance and improve the genetic yield potential under varying environmental conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Timely sowing gave wheat an 18% grain-yield advantage.

Treatment
Timely sowne0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
advantagee0
Value
18%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Timely sown wheat had grain yield advantage of 18%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–655 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DBW‐187 had the highest timely-sown grain yield, 5.77 t ha −1.

Material
DBW‐187e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.77 t ha −1e0
Qualifier
timely and late sown conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotypes DBW‐187 (5.77 t ha −1 ) and HD‐2967 (4.78 t ha −1 ) produced the highest grain yield under the timely and late sown conditions respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HD‐2967 had the highest late-sown grain yield, 4.78 t ha −1.

Material
HD‐2967e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.78 t ha −1e0
Qualifier
timely and late sown conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotypes DBW‐187 (5.77 t ha −1 ) and HD‐2967 (4.78 t ha −1 ) produced the highest grain yield under the timely and late sown conditions respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing hastened anthesis by 5.2 d.

Treatment
late sowne0
Outcome
days (d) to anthesise0
Direction
hastenede0
Value
5.2 de0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“days (d) to anthesis and grain filling period under the late sown was hastened by 5.2 d, and shortened by 7.4 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing shortened grain filling by 7.4 d.

Treatment
late sowne0
Outcome
grain filling periode0
Direction
shortenede0
Value
7.4 de0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain filling period under the late sown was hastened by 5.2 d, and shortened by 7.4 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Timely sowing enhanced post-anthesis dry matter accumulation by 18.8%.

Treatment
Timely sowinge0
Outcome
post‐anthesis dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
18.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Timely sowing enhanced the post‐anthesis dry matter accumulation and remobilization to the tune of 18.8% and 23% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Timely sowing enhanced post-anthesis dry matter remobilization by 23%.

Treatment
Timely sowinge0
Outcome
remobilizatione0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
23%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Timely sowing enhanced the post‐anthesis dry matter accumulation and remobilization to the tune of 18.8% and 23% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Timely sowing increased post-anthesis N, P and K accumulation and remobilization significantly.

Treatment
timely sowne0
Outcome
Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium accumulated post‐anthesis and their remobilizatione0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
late sowne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium accumulated post‐anthesis and their remobilization under the timely sown was significantly greater than the late sown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing increased remobilization contribution to grain content except for nitrogen.

Treatment
late sowne0
Outcome
contribution of remobilization to grain contente0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
except for the nitrogene0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“contribution of remobilization to grain content was higher under the late sown except for the nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1322 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Timely sowing cooled canopy temperature by 2°C.

Treatment
timely sowne0
Outcome
canopy temperaturee0
Direction
coolere0
Value
2°Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“canopy temperature was cooler by 2°C under the timely sown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1386 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Timely sowing raised canopy temperature depression by 0.8–1.04°C.

Organ / stage
anthesis and dough stagese0
Outcome
canopy temperature depressione0
Direction
greatere0
Value
0.8–1.04°Ce0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“canopy temperature depression was greater by 0.8–1.04°C, at anthesis and dough stages of the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1495 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Timely sowing improved leaf chlorophyll content by 10% at anthesis.

Organ / stage
anthesise0
Treatment
timely sowinge0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD meter value)e0
Direction
improvede0
Value
10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD meter value) at anthesis and dough stages improved by 10% and 7.6% due to timely sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1619 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Timely sowing improved leaf chlorophyll content by 7.6% at dough stage.

Organ / stage
dough stagese0
Treatment
timely sowinge0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD meter value)e0
Direction
improvede0
Value
7.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD meter value) at anthesis and dough stages improved by 10% and 7.6% due to timely sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1619 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HD‐2967 and HD‐3249 had relatively greater productivity and tolerance indices and higher yield stability.

Material
HD‐2967 and HD‐3249e0
Outcome
geometric mean productivity and stress tolerance indexe0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotypes HD‐2967 and HD‐3249 had relatively greater geometric mean productivity and stress tolerance index coupled with a comparatively higher yield stability index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1625–1790 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Timely sowing gave significantly superior root length, biomass and root length density at 50 DAS and anthesis.

Treatment
timely sowne0
Outcome
total root length (TRL), root biomass and root length density (RLD)e0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
50 DAS (days after sowing) and at anthesise0
Comparator
late sowne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total root length (TRL), root biomass and root length density (RLD) were significantly superior both at 50 DAS (days after sowing) and at anthesis under the timely sown compared to the late sown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–2028 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–118 · show in text ↑

sowing time · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 5 positive, 11 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

sowing time · phenology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 5 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

sowing time · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

113 papers: 65 positive, 48 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

sowing time · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

462 papers: 266 positive, 196 negative or no effect

265 papers in the same direction as this paper · 191 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

458 papers more in this group

See all 462 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.