Paper · 2018 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Delayed pollination and low availability of assimilates are major factors causing maize kernel abortion

Si Shen; Li Zhang; Xiao-Gui Liang; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
109
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Selective seed abortion is a survival strategy adopted by many species that sacrifices some seeds to allow the remaining ones to set. While in evolutionary terms this is a successful approach, it causes huge losses to crop yields. A pollination time gap (PTG) has been suggested to be associated with position-related grain abortion. To test this hypothesis, we developed a novel approach to alter the natural pattern of maize (Zea mays L.) pollination and to examine the impact of PTGs on kernel growth and the underlying physiological basis. When apical and basal kernels were synchronously pollinated, the basal kernels set and matured but the apical kernels were aborted at an early stage. Delaying pollination to the basal ovaries suppressed their development and reduced invertase activity and sugar levels, which allowed the apical kernels to set and grow normally. In situ localization revealed normal cell wall invertase activity in apical and basal kernels under synchronous pollination but reduced activity in the delayed-pollinated kernels independent of their position. Starch, which was abundant in basal kernel areas, was absent in the apical kernel regions under synchronous pollination but apparent with delayed pollination. Our analyses identified PTG-related sink strength and a low level of local assimilates as the main causes of grain abortion.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under synchronous pollination of apical and basal kernels, basal kernels set and matured while apical kernels were aborted at an early stage in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Organ / stage
apical kernelse2
Treatment
synchronously pollinatede2
Outcome
aborted at an early stagee2
Comparator
basal kernelse2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–440 · show in text ↑
e2

“When apical and basal kernels were synchronously pollinated, the basal kernels set and matured but the apical kernels were aborted at an early stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–692 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying pollination to the basal ovaries suppressed basal kernel development in maize relative to synchronous pollination.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Organ / stage
basal ovariese3
Treatment
Delaying pollination to the basal ovariese3
Outcome
developmente3
Direction
suppressede3
Comparator
synchronously pollinatede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–440 · show in text ↑
e2

“When apical and basal kernels were synchronously pollinated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–603 · show in text ↑
e3

“Delaying pollination to the basal ovaries suppressed their development and reduced invertase activity and sugar levels, which allowed the apical kernels to set and grow normally”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying pollination to the basal ovaries reduced invertase activity and sugar levels in maize relative to synchronous pollination.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Organ / stage
basal ovariese3
Treatment
Delaying pollination to the basal ovariese3
Outcome
invertase activity and sugar levelse3
Direction
reducede3
Comparator
synchronously pollinatede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–440 · show in text ↑
e2

“When apical and basal kernels were synchronously pollinated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–603 · show in text ↑
e3

“Delaying pollination to the basal ovaries suppressed their development and reduced invertase activity and sugar levels, which allowed the apical kernels to set and grow normally”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying pollination to the basal ovaries allowed apical kernels to set and grow normally in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Organ / stage
apical kernelse3
Treatment
Delaying pollination to the basal ovariese3
Outcome
set and grow normallye3
Comparator
synchronously pollinatede2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–440 · show in text ↑
e2

“When apical and basal kernels were synchronously pollinated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–603 · show in text ↑
e3

“Delaying pollination to the basal ovaries suppressed their development and reduced invertase activity and sugar levels, which allowed the apical kernels to set and grow normally”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In situ, cell wall invertase activity was normal in apical and basal kernels under synchronous pollination but reduced in delayed-pollinated kernels irrespective of position in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Organ / stage
apical and basal kernelse4
Treatment
delayed-pollinated kernelse4
Outcome
cell wall invertase activitye4
Direction
reducede4
Qualifier
independent of their positione4
Comparator
under synchronous pollinatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–440 · show in text ↑
e4

“In situ localization revealed normal cell wall invertase activity in apical and basal kernels under synchronous pollination but reduced activity in the delayed-pollinated kernels independent of their position”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starch was absent in apical kernel regions under synchronous pollination but present with delayed pollination in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Organ / stage
apical kernel regionse5
Treatment
delayed pollinatione5
Outcome
Starche5
Comparator
under synchronous pollinatione5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–440 · show in text ↑
e5

“Starch, which was abundant in basal kernel areas, was absent in the apical kernel regions under synchronous pollination but apparent with delayed pollination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1240 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PTG-related sink strength and a low level of local assimilates were identified as the main causes of grain abortion in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
grain abortione6
Qualifier
PTG-related sink strength and a low level of local assimilatese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–440 · show in text ↑
e6

“Our analyses identified PTG-related sink strength and a low level of local assimilates as the main causes of grain abortion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1365 · show in text ↑

pollination · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.