Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Influence of plant growth regulators on growth, yield and quality of sugarcane under south Gujarat

Darpana Patel; MP Chaudhary

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiment to assess the effects of ethrel and gibberlic acid on growth, yield and quality of sugarcane was conducted for three years (2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17) at the Main Sugarcane research Station, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, Gujarat, India. The results of the experiment indicated that planting of sugarcane with overnight soaking in 50 ppm ethrel solution increase germination to tune of 18.54% over conventional system of planting. Tiller population was also noticed significantly highest almost with growth regulators applied plots at both stages. Leaf area index was significantly increased with overnight soaking of setts in 50 or 100 ppm ethrel solution with spraying of gibberellic acid (35 ppm) at 90, 120 and 150 DAP (days after planting) (T8) as compared to three budded setts planting. Yield and yield parameters viz., number of millable cane (108.23 000 ha-1), cane length (264.50 cm), cane and commercial cane sugar yield (124.09 and 16.55 t ha-1) respectively, was also recorded significantly highest with treatment T8 as compared to conventional planting. Significant difference in juice quality parameters were not observed due to growth regulators treatment. Thus, the study showed that to obtain higher sugarcane production, setts should be planted after overnight soaking in 100 pppm ethrel solution with spraying of GA3 at 90, 120 and 150 DAP

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overnight soaking of setts in 50 ppm ethrel increased germination of sugarcane by 18.54% over conventional planting

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
overnight soaking in 50 ppm ethrel solutione0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
18.54%e0
Comparator
conventional system of plantinge0

Verbatim

e0

“planting of sugarcane with overnight soaking in 50 ppm ethrel solution increase germination to tune of 18.54% over conventional system of planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulator treatments significantly increased tiller population of sugarcane at both stages

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
growth regulators applied plotse1
Outcome
Tiller populatione1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“planting of sugarcane with overnight soaking in 50 ppm ethrel solution increase germination to tune of 18.54% over conventional system of planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–460 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tiller population was also noticed significantly highest almost with growth regulators applied plots at both stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–577 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area index of sugarcane increased with ethrel soaking plus GA3 spraying (T8) compared with three-budded setts

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
overnight soaking of setts in 50 or 100 ppm ethrel solution with spraying of gibberellic acid (35 ppm) at 90, 120 and 150 DAPe2
Outcome
Leaf area indexe2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
three budded setts plantinge2

Verbatim

e0

“planting of sugarcane with overnight soaking in 50 ppm ethrel solution increase germination to tune of 18.54% over conventional system of planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–460 · show in text ↑
e2

“Leaf area index was significantly increased with overnight soaking of setts in 50 or 100 ppm ethrel solution with spraying of gibberellic acid (35 ppm) at 90, 120 and 150 DAP (days after planting) (T8) as compared to three budded setts planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of millable cane of sugarcane was highest with treatment T8 compared with conventional planting

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
treatment T8e4
Outcome
number of millable canee3
Direction
higheste4
Value
108.23 000 ha-1e3
Comparator
conventional plantinge4

Verbatim

e0

“planting of sugarcane with overnight soaking in 50 ppm ethrel solution increase germination to tune of 18.54% over conventional system of planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–460 · show in text ↑
e3

“number of millable cane (108.23 000 ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–899 · show in text ↑
e4

“was also recorded significantly highest with treatment T8 as compared to conventional planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1097 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane length of sugarcane was highest with treatment T8 compared with conventional planting

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
treatment T8e4
Outcome
cane lengthe5
Direction
higheste4
Value
264.50 cme5
Comparator
conventional plantinge4

Verbatim

e0

“planting of sugarcane with overnight soaking in 50 ppm ethrel solution increase germination to tune of 18.54% over conventional system of planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–460 · show in text ↑
e5

“cane length (264.50 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–924 · show in text ↑
e4

“was also recorded significantly highest with treatment T8 as compared to conventional planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1097 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane yield of sugarcane was highest with treatment T8 compared with conventional planting

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
treatment T8e4
Outcome
cane and commercial cane sugar yielde6
Direction
higheste4
Value
124.09e6
Comparator
conventional plantinge4

Verbatim

e0

“planting of sugarcane with overnight soaking in 50 ppm ethrel solution increase germination to tune of 18.54% over conventional system of planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–460 · show in text ↑
e6

“cane and commercial cane sugar yield (124.09 and 16.55 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–988 · show in text ↑
e4

“was also recorded significantly highest with treatment T8 as compared to conventional planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1097 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Commercial cane sugar yield of sugarcane was highest with treatment T8 compared with conventional planting

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
treatment T8e4
Outcome
commercial cane sugar yielde6
Direction
higheste4
Value
16.55 t ha-1e6
Comparator
conventional plantinge4

Verbatim

e0

“planting of sugarcane with overnight soaking in 50 ppm ethrel solution increase germination to tune of 18.54% over conventional system of planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–460 · show in text ↑
e6

“cane and commercial cane sugar yield (124.09 and 16.55 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–988 · show in text ↑
e4

“was also recorded significantly highest with treatment T8 as compared to conventional planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1097 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Juice quality parameters of sugarcane were not significantly different among growth regulator treatments

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
growth regulators treatmente7
Outcome
juice quality parameterse7
Direction
not observede7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“planting of sugarcane with overnight soaking in 50 ppm ethrel solution increase germination to tune of 18.54% over conventional system of planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–460 · show in text ↑
e7

“Significant difference in juice quality parameters were not observed due to growth regulators treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1202 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Planting setts after overnight soaking in 100 ppm ethrel with GA3 spraying at 90, 120 and 150 DAP is recommended for higher sugarcane production

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
higher sugarcane productione7

Verbatim

e0

“planting of sugarcane with overnight soaking in 50 ppm ethrel solution increase germination to tune of 18.54% over conventional system of planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–460 · show in text ↑
e7

“to obtain higher sugarcane production, setts should be planted after overnight soaking in 100 pppm ethrel solution with spraying of GA3 at 90, 120 and 150 DAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1390 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Gibberellic acid · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

application · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 42 positive, 7 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

class · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

class · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.