Paper · 1991

Effect of plant density and bulb size on yield and quality of shallot

M.P.K. Stallen; Yusdar Hilman

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effect of plant density and bulb size on yield and quality of shallot. Shallot planting material of tree different qualities (based on diameter of bulb) were planted at four different plant densities (25, 44, 100 and 178 bulbs/square m) on alluvial soil in Kramat in the dry season of 1990. A completely randomized block design with four replications was used. Total yield per plot was highest in case of large bulbs planted at the highest plant density, but 74 percent of the harvest consisted of small bulbs with a diameter less than 1 cm. Planting distance had a significant effect on the composition of the harvest. A low plant density resulted in a higher percentage large bulbs, although total yield per area was lower. The size of the bulbs planted had no effect on the composition of the harvest, but large bulbs developed more bulbs per plant, which resulted in a higher total yield. An economic analysis with various prices for seed and consumption shallots showed an optimum plant density with the highest grass margin of about 50 plants/square m. In case small bulbs fetch relative low price, lower plant densities of about 25 plants/square m will be optimum. In general the best quality bulbs for planting are medium sized bulbs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Large bulbs at the highest density gave the highest yield per plot.

Treatment
large bulbs planted at the highest plant densitye0
Outcome
Total yield per plote0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total yield per plot was highest in case of large bulbs planted at the highest plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–453 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At that combination, 74 percent of harvested bulbs were smaller than 1 cm.

Outcome
harvest consisted of small bulbse0
Value
74 percente0
Qualifier
diameter less than 1 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but 74 percent of the harvest consisted of small bulbs with a diameter less than 1 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting distance significantly changed the composition of the harvest.

Treatment
Planting distancee0
Outcome
composition of the harveste0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting distance had a significant effect on the composition of the harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–619 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low density increased the percentage of large bulbs.

Treatment
low plant densitye0
Outcome
percentage large bulbse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A low plant density resulted in a higher percentage large bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low density reduced total yield per area.

Treatment
low plant densitye0
Outcome
total yield per areae0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A low plant density resulted in a higher percentage large bulbs, although total yield per area was lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planted bulb size did not affect harvest composition.

Treatment
size of the bulbs plantede0
Outcome
composition of the harveste0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The size of the bulbs planted had no effect on the composition of the harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Large seed bulbs developed more bulbs per plant.

Treatment
large bulbse0
Outcome
bulbs per plante0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“large bulbs developed more bulbs per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Large seed bulbs gave higher total yield.

Treatment
large bulbse0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“large bulbs developed more bulbs per plant, which resulted in a higher total yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Economic analysis identified about 50 plants per square metre as optimal for gross margin.

Outcome
grass margine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
about 50 plants/square me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an optimum plant density with the highest grass margin of about 50 plants/square m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1057 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

When small bulbs fetch a relatively low price, about 25 plants per square metre is optimal.

Outcome
lower plant densities of about 25 plants/square me0
Qualifier
small bulbs fetch relative low pricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case small bulbs fetch relative low price, lower plant densities of about 25 plants/square m will be optimum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Medium sized bulbs are recommended for planting.

Outcome
medium sized bulbse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In general the best quality bulbs for planting are medium sized bulbs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1242 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 48 positive, 6 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.