Paper · 2018 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Sugarcane by-products used as soil amendments on a sandy soil: Effects on sugarcane crop nutrition and yield

Susanna Gomez Orndorff; Timothy Albert Lang; Jehangir Hoshang Bhadha; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Agricultural by-products applied as soil amendments have the potential to improve crop production on low organic matter (OM) soils. This two-year study investigated the use of two readily available sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) milling by-products, mill mud, and mill ash, as soil amendments to improve first sugarcane crop (plant cane) and subsequent crop (first ratoon) grown on a sandy Spodosol. Sugarcane was grown in lysimeters receiving mill mud, mill ash, and a 50:50 (v:v) mill mud to mill ash mix. Amendments were applied at low, medium, and high application rates (5, 10, and 15 cm depths, respectively) and then incorporated 30 cm deep. Amendment effects on plant nutrition, soil characteristics, and crop yield were determined. High rate applied mill mud and mill ash had the highest soil OM content for both years and soil OM did not significantly change between crops for all treatments except for high rate mill mud, which increased the second year (ratoon crop). Leaf nutrient levels for nitrogen (N), iron (Fe), and copper (Cu) for all treatments both years were insufficient; nutrient levels for magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), and silicon (Si) were within marginal to sufficient range for all treatments both years. All amendments produced significantly higher biomass and sucrose yields for plant cane and first ratoon crops compared to the control. Mill ash treatments produced the greatest increase in sucrose and biomass yields from plant cane to ratoon crops, which corresponded with an increase in potassium (K) in leaf tissue. However, mid and high rates of mix produced the highest sugarcane biomass and sucrose yields for the both the plant cane and ratoon crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High rate mill mud and mill ash had the highest soil organic matter in both years.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
High rate applied mill mud and mill ashe0
Outcome
soil OM contente0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
both yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“High rate applied mill mud and mill ash had the highest soil OM content for both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic matter did not significantly change between crops for most treatments.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
soil OMe0
Direction
did not significantly changee0
Qualifier
all treatments except for high rate mill mude0

Verbatim

e0

“soil OM did not significantly change between crops for all treatments except for high rate mill mud”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High rate mill mud increased soil organic matter in the ratoon year.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
high rate mill mude0
Outcome
soil OMe1
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
second year (ratoon crop)e0
Comparator
between cropse1

Verbatim

e0

“high rate mill mud, which increased the second year (ratoon crop)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–974 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil OM did not significantly change between crops for all treatments except for high rate mill mud”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf N, Fe and Cu were insufficient across treatments in both years.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
Leaf nutrient levels for nitrogen (N), iron (Fe), and copper (Cu)e0
Qualifier
all treatments both yearse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf nutrient levels for nitrogen (N), iron (Fe), and copper (Cu) for all treatments both years were insufficient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf Mg, Mn and Si were marginal to sufficient across treatments in both years.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
nutrient levels for magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), and silicon (Si)e0
Qualifier
all treatments both yearse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient levels for magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), and silicon (Si) were within marginal to sufficient range for all treatments both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All amendments increased biomass relative to control for plant cane and first ratoon.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
plant cane and first ratoon cropse0
Treatment
All amendmentse0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“All amendments produced significantly higher biomass and sucrose yields for plant cane and first ratoon crops compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All amendments increased sucrose yield relative to control for plant cane and first ratoon.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
plant cane and first ratoon cropse0
Treatment
All amendmentse0
Outcome
sucrose yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“All amendments produced significantly higher biomass and sucrose yields for plant cane and first ratoon crops compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mill ash produced the largest plant-cane-to-ratoon increase in sucrose yield.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
ratoon cropse0
Treatment
Mill ash treatmentse0
Outcome
sucrosee0
Direction
greatest increasee0
Comparator
plant canee0

Verbatim

e0

“Mill ash treatments produced the greatest increase in sucrose and biomass yields from plant cane to ratoon crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1479 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mill ash produced the largest plant-cane-to-ratoon increase in biomass yield.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
ratoon cropse0
Treatment
Mill ash treatmentse0
Outcome
biomass yieldse0
Direction
greatest increasee0
Comparator
plant canee0

Verbatim

e0

“Mill ash treatments produced the greatest increase in sucrose and biomass yields from plant cane to ratoon crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1479 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mill-ash-associated yield increase corresponded to more leaf potassium.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
leaf tissuee0
Treatment
Mill ash treatmentse1
Outcome
increase in potassium (K) in leaf tissuee0
Direction
increasee0

Verbatim

e0

“which corresponded with an increase in potassium (K) in leaf tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1548 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mill ash treatments produced the greatest increase in sucrose and biomass yields from plant cane to ratoon crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1479 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid and high mix rates gave the highest biomass yields in both crops.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
plant cane and ratoon cropse0
Treatment
mid and high rates of mixe0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“mid and high rates of mix produced the highest sugarcane biomass and sucrose yields for the both the plant cane and ratoon crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid and high mix rates gave the highest sucrose yields in both crops.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
plant cane and ratoon cropse0
Treatment
mid and high rates of mixe0
Outcome
sucrose yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“mid and high rates of mix produced the highest sugarcane biomass and sucrose yields for the both the plant cane and ratoon crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1687 · show in text ↑

other · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

other · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.