Paper · 2017 · Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova

Effect of Deficit Irrigation on Raised Bed Wheat Cultivation

R. Zaman; A.R. Akanda; S.K. Biswas; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract The experiment was conducted during Rabi season of 2015-2016 and 2016-2017 at the Regional Agricultural Research station, BARI, Ishurdi, Pabna, Bangladesh, to determine the water requirements of wheat on raised bed and the effect of different deficit irrigation on yield, water use efficiency and applied water productivity under raised bed wheat. This study consisted of following irrigation treatments: T 1 = Irrigations up to 100% field capacity (FC) at crown root initiation (CRI), botting and grain filling stages (flat bed), T 2 = Irrigations up to 100% FC at CRI, botting and grain filling stages on raised bed, T 3 = Irrigations up to 80% FC at CRI, botting and grain filling stages on raised bed and T 4 = Irrigations up to 60% FC at CRI, botting and grain filling stages on raised bed and laid out in a randomize complete block design with three replications. The result showed that significant effect of irrigation treatments were observed on plant height, spike per m 2 and grain yield. Highest grain yield (4.66 t/ha) was obtained from treatment, irrigations up to 100% FC at CRI, botting and grain filling stages on raised bed, followed by irrigation up to 100% FC at same stages on flat bed. At raised bed wheat cultivation saving 14.30% water with increasing 15.66% grain yield than flat bed. Besides, comparing deficit irrigation (20% and 40% of full irrigation) and full irrigation condition on raised bed seeding system water use could be reduced about 4.18% to 5.57%, while scarifying 18.20% to 32.33% grain yield, where reduced 14.17% to 27.54% water use efficiency. Maximum applied water productivity 1.81 kg m −3 was observed in raised bed full irrigation condition. The rate of daily evaporation started to increase as the temperature started to rise and humidity started to decrease during the crop growing period. The results will be helpful for taking policy decision regarding efficient irrigation and water management under prevailing water scarce situation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation treatments significantly affected wheat plant height, spikes per area and grain yield.

Treatment
irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
plant height, spike per m 2 and grain yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant effect of irrigation treatments were observed on plant height, spike per m 2 and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation on raised beds produced the highest grain yield, 4.66 t/ha.

Treatment
irrigations up to 100% FC at CRI, botting and grain filling stages on raised bede0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
4.66 t/hae0
Comparator
irrigation up to 100% FC at same stages on flat bede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest grain yield (4.66 t/ha) was obtained from treatment, irrigations up to 100% FC at CRI, botting and grain filling stages on raised bed, followed by irrigation up to 100% FC at same stages on flat bed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1214 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised-bed cultivation saved 14.30% water versus flat beds.

Treatment
raised bede0
Outcome
watere0
Direction
savinge0
Value
14.30%e0
Comparator
flat bede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At raised bed wheat cultivation saving 14.30% water with increasing 15.66% grain yield than flat bed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised beds increased wheat grain yield by 15.66% versus flat beds.

Treatment
raised bede0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
15.66%e0
Comparator
flat bede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At raised bed wheat cultivation saving 14.30% water with increasing 15.66% grain yield than flat bed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation reduced water use by about 4.18% to 5.57% on raised beds.

Treatment
deficit irrigation (20% and 40% of full irrigation)e0
Outcome
water usee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
4.18% to 5.57%e0
Comparator
full irrigation conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“comparing deficit irrigation (20% and 40% of full irrigation) and full irrigation condition on raised bed seeding system water use could be reduced about 4.18% to 5.57%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1495 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation reduced grain yield by 18.20% to 32.33%.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
scarifyinge0
Value
18.20% to 32.33%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while scarifying 18.20% to 32.33% grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1542 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation reduced water use efficiency by 14.17% to 27.54%.

Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
14.17% to 27.54%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“where reduced 14.17% to 27.54% water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1595 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation on raised beds gave maximum applied water productivity of 1.81 kg m −3.

Treatment
raised bed full irrigation conditione0
Outcome
applied water productivitye0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
1.81 kg m −3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum applied water productivity 1.81 kg m −3 was observed in raised bed full irrigation condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1697 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑

crown compound · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 30 positive, 7 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

303 papers: 253 positive, 50 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

299 papers more in this group

See all 303 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.