Abstract
The study was conducted in village Rupana of Sirsa district where about 120 ha land is salt affected. In kharif season, the field remained fallow due to hazardous effect of salts. Even in Rabi season, the traditional wheat varieties could not withstand owing to higher salt accumulation in root zone. In the Rabi 201314, KVK demonstrated a salt tolerant wheat variety for salt affected area of the village. Initially seed of variety was demonstrated to 15 farmers in the year 2013–14. This variety registered an average yield of 32.4 q/ha as compared to PBW-343 (10.2 q/ha). In the next year 2014–15, a new salt tolerant variety No. 2 (KRL-213) was also introduced in the village which proved to be more effective than salt tolerant variety no 1. In all, both salt tolerant varieties were superior and economically viable as compared to PBW-343.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
The salt-tolerant wheat variety gave an average yield of 32.4 q/ha, higher than PBW-343 at 10.2 q/ha.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- salt tolerant wheat varietye3
- Outcome
- average yielde2
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 32.4 q/hae2
- Qualifier
- 10.2 q/hae2
- Comparator
- PBW-343e2
- Setting
- Rupana of Sirsa districte1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Salt Tolerant Wheat Varieties”
e1“The study was conducted in village Rupana of Sirsa district where about 120 ha land is salt affected”
e2“This variety registered an average yield of 32.4 q/ha as compared to PBW-343 (10.2 q/ha)”
e3“KVK demonstrated a salt tolerant wheat variety for salt affected area of the village”
Claim · model-written summary
Salt-tolerant variety No. 2 (KRL-213) was more effective than salt-tolerant variety no 1.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- KRL-213e4
- Treatment
- salt tolerant variety No. 2 (KRL-213)e4
- Outcome
- effectivee4
- Direction
- more effectivee4
- Comparator
- salt tolerant variety no 1e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Salt Tolerant Wheat Varieties”
e4“a new salt tolerant variety No. 2 (KRL-213) was also introduced in the village which proved to be more effective than salt tolerant variety no 1”
Claim · model-written summary
Both salt-tolerant varieties were superior and economically viable compared with PBW-343.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- both salt tolerant varietiese5
- Outcome
- superior and economically viablee5
- Direction
- superiore5
- Comparator
- PBW-343e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Salt Tolerant Wheat Varieties”
e5“both salt tolerant varieties were superior and economically viable as compared to PBW-343”
The same questions in other papers
salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 197 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
223 papers more in this group
See all 227 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.