Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at the All India Co-ordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, UAS, GKVK, Bengaluru during kharif 2013-14. The experiment was laid out with 20 treatment combinations with three factors using factorial RBD with two replications comprised of on a permanent manurial trial with 35th crop cycle. Application of FYM at 10 t ha-1 has recorded significantly higher grain yield (1.76 t ha-1), maximum water holding capacity (MWHC) of 43.85 % and dehydrogenase activity (DHA) of 357.60?g TPF g-1 24 h-1 obtained after harvest of the crop as compared to application of maize residues at 5 t ha-1 (1.37 t ha-1, 42.27 % and 193.0?g TPF g-1 24 h-1 respectively) due to improved growth and yield parameters of finger millet. However, finger millet-groundnut rotation has given significantly higher grain yield (1.78 t ha-1), MWHC (43.66 %) and DHA (298.48?g TPF g-1 24 h-1) after harvest of the crop over mono cropping of finger millet (1.34 t ha-1, 42.46% and 252.12?g TPFg-1 24 h-1respectively ). Among different nutrient sources, application of organic matter with 100 % RDF have given significantly higher grain yield (2.74 t ha-1), MWHC (45.86 %) and DHA (431.13?g TPF g-1 24 h-1) after harvest of the crop compared to absolute control (0.28 t ha-1, 41.76 % and 133.67?g TPFg-1 24 h-1 respectively). The 100 % recommended dose of fertilizer + organic matter significantly increased yield attributes because of improved soil physical and chemical properties and increased microbial activity of the soil with continued application of organic matter.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
FYM at 10 t/ha gave significantly higher finger millet grain yield than maize residues at 5 t/ha.
- Taxon
- finger millet
Eleusine coracanat0 - Treatment
- application of FYM at 10 t ha-1e1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 1.76 t ha-1e1
- Comparator
- maize residues at 5 t ha-1e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e1“Application of FYM at 10 t ha-1 has recorded significantly higher grain yield (1.76 t ha-1), maximum water holding capacity (MWHC) of 43.85 % and dehydrogenase activity (DHA) of 357.60?g TPF g-1 24 h-1 obtained after harvest of the crop as compared to application of maize residues at 5 t ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM at 10 t/ha gave higher maximum water holding capacity of the soil than maize residues at 5 t/ha.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- application of FYM at 10 t ha-1e1
- Outcome
- maximum water holding capacity (MWHC)e1
- Direction
- higherinferrede1
- Value
- 43.85 %e1
- Comparator
- maize residues at 5 t ha-1e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e1“Application of FYM at 10 t ha-1 has recorded significantly higher grain yield (1.76 t ha-1), maximum water holding capacity (MWHC) of 43.85 % and dehydrogenase activity (DHA) of 357.60?g TPF g-1 24 h-1 obtained after harvest of the crop as compared to application of maize residues at 5 t ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM at 10 t/ha gave higher dehydrogenase activity than maize residues at 5 t/ha.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- application of FYM at 10 t ha-1e1
- Outcome
- dehydrogenase activity (DHA)e1
- Direction
- higherinferrede1
- Value
- 357.60?g TPF g-1 24 h-1e1
- Comparator
- maize residues at 5 t ha-1e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e1“Application of FYM at 10 t ha-1 has recorded significantly higher grain yield (1.76 t ha-1), maximum water holding capacity (MWHC) of 43.85 % and dehydrogenase activity (DHA) of 357.60?g TPF g-1 24 h-1 obtained after harvest of the crop as compared to application of maize residues at 5 t ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
Finger millet-groundnut rotation gave significantly higher finger millet grain yield than mono cropping of finger millet.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- finger millet-groundnut rotatione2
- Outcome
- grain yielde2
- Direction
- highere2
- Value
- 1.78 t ha-1e2
- Comparator
- mono cropping of finger millete2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e2“However, finger millet-groundnut rotation has given significantly higher grain yield (1.78 t ha-1), MWHC (43.66 %) and DHA (298.48?g TPF g-1 24 h-1) after harvest of the crop over mono cropping of finger millet”
Claim · model-written summary
Finger millet-groundnut rotation gave higher MWHC than mono cropping of finger millet.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- finger millet-groundnut rotatione2
- Outcome
- MWHCe2
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 43.66 %e2
- Comparator
- mono cropping of finger millete2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e2“However, finger millet-groundnut rotation has given significantly higher grain yield (1.78 t ha-1), MWHC (43.66 %) and DHA (298.48?g TPF g-1 24 h-1) after harvest of the crop over mono cropping of finger millet”
Claim · model-written summary
Finger millet-groundnut rotation gave higher DHA than mono cropping of finger millet.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- finger millet-groundnut rotatione2
- Outcome
- DHAe2
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 298.48?g TPF g-1 24 h-1e2
- Comparator
- mono cropping of finger millete2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e2“However, finger millet-groundnut rotation has given significantly higher grain yield (1.78 t ha-1), MWHC (43.66 %) and DHA (298.48?g TPF g-1 24 h-1) after harvest of the crop over mono cropping of finger millet”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic matter with 100 per cent RDF gave significantly higher finger millet grain yield than the absolute control.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- application of organic matter with 100 % RDFe3
- Outcome
- grain yielde3
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 2.74 t ha-1e3
- Comparator
- absolute controle3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e3“Among different nutrient sources, application of organic matter with 100 % RDF have given significantly higher grain yield (2.74 t ha-1), MWHC (45.86 %) and DHA (431.13?g TPF g-1 24 h-1) after harvest of the crop compared to absolute control”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic matter with 100 per cent RDF gave higher MWHC than the absolute control.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- application of organic matter with 100 % RDFe3
- Outcome
- MWHCe3
- Direction
- higherinferrede3
- Value
- 45.86 %e3
- Comparator
- absolute controle3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e3“Among different nutrient sources, application of organic matter with 100 % RDF have given significantly higher grain yield (2.74 t ha-1), MWHC (45.86 %) and DHA (431.13?g TPF g-1 24 h-1) after harvest of the crop compared to absolute control”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic matter with 100 per cent RDF gave higher DHA than the absolute control.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- application of organic matter with 100 % RDFe3
- Outcome
- DHAe3
- Direction
- higherinferrede3
- Value
- 431.13?g TPF g-1 24 h-1e3
- Comparator
- absolute controle3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e3“Among different nutrient sources, application of organic matter with 100 % RDF have given significantly higher grain yield (2.74 t ha-1), MWHC (45.86 %) and DHA (431.13?g TPF g-1 24 h-1) after harvest of the crop compared to absolute control”
Claim · model-written summary
The 100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizer with organic matter increased finger millet yield attributes, plausibly through improved soil physical and chemical properties and increased microbial activity.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 100 % recommended dose of fertilizer + organic mattere4
- Outcome
- yield attributese4
- Qualifier
- improved soil physical and chemical properties and increased microbial activity of the soile4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet”
e4“The 100 % recommended dose of fertilizer + organic matter significantly increased yield attributes because of improved soil physical and chemical properties and increased microbial activity of the soil with continued application of organic matter”
The same questions in other papers
organic · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
170 papers more in this group
See all 174 papers →organic · soil: physics · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
fertilization · soil: physics · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
rotation · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
fertilization · soil: biology · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.