Abstract
Field experiment was conducted at University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore to study the significance of liquid bio fertilizer consortium and modes of its application on growth, yield and nutrient uptake by crop and soil fertility of transplanted finger millet.The treatments included 100, 85 and 70 per cent of recommended dose of fertilizers with liquid bio fertilizer consortium through different methods of application seed treatment, soil application and seedling root dip.Application of 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of application with viz., liquid bio fertilizer consortium (seed treatment, soil application and seedling root dip) numbered as the best technology by having obtained having higher plant height at harvest(102.9cm), tillers per plant (4.2), dry matter accumulation at harvest (52.12 g/plant), grain and straw yield (4080 and 7810 kg/ha, respectively), nutrient uptake (76.57, 36.40 and 76.53 kg nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium ha, respectively) with / slightly higher post-harvest available nutrients in soil (244, 86 and 210 kg N, P O and K O/ha, respectively) and higher soil microbial count at 2 5 2 50% flowering (52.3 , 38.6 cfu/g 10 and 16.6 cfu/g 10 bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes, respectively).However, this treatment par with 6 3 100% RDF + soil application for all the parameters and emerged as most feasible treatment from the perspective of higher profitability and practical feasibility.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Finger millet plant height at harvest was higher with 100 % RDF plus combined biofertilizer methods (102.9 cm).
- Taxon
- Finger Millet
Eleusine coracanat0 - Treatment
- 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of applicatione0
- Outcome
- plant height at harveste1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 102.9cme1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet”
e0“Application of 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of application”
e1“higher plant height at harvest(102.9cm), tillers per plant (4.2), dry matter accumulation at harvest (52.12 g/plant), grain and straw yield (4080 and 7810 kg/ha, respectively), nutrient uptake (76.57, 36.40 and 76.53 kg nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium ha, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Finger millet tillers per plant were higher with 100 % RDF plus combined biofertilizer methods (4.2).
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of applicatione0
- Outcome
- tillers per plante1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 4.2e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet”
e0“Application of 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of application”
e1“higher plant height at harvest(102.9cm), tillers per plant (4.2), dry matter accumulation at harvest (52.12 g/plant), grain and straw yield (4080 and 7810 kg/ha, respectively), nutrient uptake (76.57, 36.40 and 76.53 kg nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium ha, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Finger millet dry matter accumulation at harvest was higher with 100 % RDF plus combined biofertilizer methods (52.12 g/plant).
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of applicatione0
- Outcome
- dry matter accumulation at harveste1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 52.12 g/plante1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet”
e0“Application of 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of application”
e1“higher plant height at harvest(102.9cm), tillers per plant (4.2), dry matter accumulation at harvest (52.12 g/plant), grain and straw yield (4080 and 7810 kg/ha, respectively), nutrient uptake (76.57, 36.40 and 76.53 kg nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium ha, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Finger millet grain yield was higher with 100 % RDF plus combined biofertilizer methods (4080 kg/ha).
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of applicatione0
- Outcome
- grain and straw yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 4080e1
- Qualifier
- graine1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet”
e0“Application of 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of application”
e1“higher plant height at harvest(102.9cm), tillers per plant (4.2), dry matter accumulation at harvest (52.12 g/plant), grain and straw yield (4080 and 7810 kg/ha, respectively), nutrient uptake (76.57, 36.40 and 76.53 kg nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium ha, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Finger millet straw yield was higher with 100 % RDF plus combined biofertilizer methods (7810 kg/ha).
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of applicatione0
- Outcome
- grain and straw yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 7810e1
- Qualifier
- strawe1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet”
e0“Application of 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of application”
e1“higher plant height at harvest(102.9cm), tillers per plant (4.2), dry matter accumulation at harvest (52.12 g/plant), grain and straw yield (4080 and 7810 kg/ha, respectively), nutrient uptake (76.57, 36.40 and 76.53 kg nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium ha, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Finger millet nitrogen uptake was higher with 100 % RDF plus combined biofertilizer methods (76.57).
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of applicatione0
- Outcome
- nutrient uptakee1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 76.57e1
- Qualifier
- nitrogene1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet”
e0“Application of 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of application”
e1“higher plant height at harvest(102.9cm), tillers per plant (4.2), dry matter accumulation at harvest (52.12 g/plant), grain and straw yield (4080 and 7810 kg/ha, respectively), nutrient uptake (76.57, 36.40 and 76.53 kg nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium ha, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Finger millet phosphorus uptake was higher with 100 % RDF plus combined biofertilizer methods (36.40).
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of applicatione0
- Outcome
- nutrient uptakee1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 36.40e1
- Qualifier
- phosphorouse1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet”
e0“Application of 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of application”
e1“higher plant height at harvest(102.9cm), tillers per plant (4.2), dry matter accumulation at harvest (52.12 g/plant), grain and straw yield (4080 and 7810 kg/ha, respectively), nutrient uptake (76.57, 36.40 and 76.53 kg nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium ha, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Finger millet potassium uptake was higher with 100 % RDF plus combined biofertilizer methods (76.53).
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of applicatione0
- Outcome
- nutrient uptakee1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 76.53e1
- Qualifier
- potassiume1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet”
e0“Application of 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of application”
e1“higher plant height at harvest(102.9cm), tillers per plant (4.2), dry matter accumulation at harvest (52.12 g/plant), grain and straw yield (4080 and 7810 kg/ha, respectively), nutrient uptake (76.57, 36.40 and 76.53 kg nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium ha, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Post-harvest available nitrogen in soil was slightly higher with 100 % RDF plus combined biofertilizer methods (244 kg/ha).
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of applicatione0
- Outcome
- post-harvest available nutrients in soile2
- Direction
- slightly highere2
- Value
- 244e2
- Qualifier
- kg Ne2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet”
e0“Application of 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of application”
e2“with / slightly higher post-harvest available nutrients in soil (244, 86 and 210 kg N, P O and K O/ha, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Post-harvest available phosphorus in soil was slightly higher with 100 % RDF plus combined biofertilizer methods (86 kg/ha).
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of applicatione0
- Outcome
- post-harvest available nutrients in soile2
- Direction
- slightly highere2
- Value
- 86e2
- Qualifier
- P Oe2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet”
e0“Application of 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of application”
e2“with / slightly higher post-harvest available nutrients in soil (244, 86 and 210 kg N, P O and K O/ha, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Post-harvest available potassium in soil was slightly higher with 100 % RDF plus combined biofertilizer methods (210 kg/ha).
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of applicatione0
- Outcome
- post-harvest available nutrients in soile2
- Direction
- slightly highere2
- Value
- 210e2
- Qualifier
- K Oe2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet”
e0“Application of 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of application”
e2“with / slightly higher post-harvest available nutrients in soil (244, 86 and 210 kg N, P O and K O/ha, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil bacterial count at 50 % flowering was higher with 100 % RDF plus combined biofertilizer methods (52.3).
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Organ / stage
- 50% floweringe3
- Treatment
- 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of applicatione0
- Outcome
- soil microbial counte3
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 52.3e3
- Qualifier
- bacteriae3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet”
e0“Application of 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of application”
e3“higher soil microbial count at 2 5 2 50% flowering (52.3 , 38.6 cfu/g 10 and 16.6 cfu/g 10 bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil fungal count at 50 % flowering was higher with 100 % RDF plus combined biofertilizer methods (38.6).
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Organ / stage
- 50% floweringe3
- Treatment
- 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of applicatione0
- Outcome
- soil microbial counte3
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 38.6e3
- Qualifier
- fungie3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet”
e0“Application of 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of application”
e3“higher soil microbial count at 2 5 2 50% flowering (52.3 , 38.6 cfu/g 10 and 16.6 cfu/g 10 bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil actinomycete count at 50 % flowering was higher with 100 % RDF plus combined biofertilizer methods (16.6).
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Organ / stage
- 50% floweringe3
- Treatment
- 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of applicatione0
- Outcome
- soil microbial counte3
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 16.6e3
- Qualifier
- actinomycetese3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet”
e0“Application of 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of application”
e3“higher soil microbial count at 2 5 2 50% flowering (52.3 , 38.6 cfu/g 10 and 16.6 cfu/g 10 bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
With 6 3 100% RDF plus soil application, the combined-method treatment performed on par for all parameters.
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- combined methods of applicatione0
- Outcome
- parameterse4
- Direction
- par withe4
- Comparator
- 100% RDF + soil applicatione4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet”
e0“Application of 100 per cent RDF + combined methods of application”
e4“this treatment par with 6 3 100% RDF + soil application for all the parameters”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
170 papers more in this group
See all 174 papers →fertilization · soil: biology · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.