Paper · 2017 · Agrica

Effect of different sugarcane genotypes and fertility levels on productivity of sugaracene

Satendra Kumar; I.S Singh; S.C. Singh; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during 2015–16 and 2016–17 at research farm of Genda Singh Sugarcane Breeding and Research Institute, Seorahi, Uttar pradesh. The experiment consisted of nine treatment combinations. Two budded sugarcane setts were planted in furrows at 90 cm row to row distance. Three genotypes i.e. V1-CoSe 11453, V2-CoS 09232, V3-CoSe 08452 and three fertility levels i.e. F1-75% Recommended dose of NPK, F1-100% Recommended dose of NPK, F3-125% Recommended dose of NPK were tested in factorial randomized block design. Recommended dose of fertilizers (NPK) was 180, 80, 60 kg per ha and applied as per treatments. All treatments were replicated three times. The experimental field soil was medium in organic carbon (0.50%), medium in available phosphorus (17.73 kg/ha) and low in potash (99.65 kg/ha) with pH 8.02. Effect of genotype/varieties on shoot population, NMC and cane yield was non significant. Germination per cent was observed significantly higher in genotype CoS 09232 as compared to other genotypes/varieties. At 125 per cent recommend dose of fertilizer, germination, shoot population, NMC and cane yield were significantly higher as compared to 75 and 100 per cent RDF, however, the shoot population was statistically at par with 100 per cent RDF treatment. During 2016–17, the experimental field was medium in organic carbon (0.65%), medium in available phosphorus (17.65 kg/ha) and low in potash (109.70 kg/ha) with pH 8.01. Effect of varieties on germination was noted non significant. Variety CoSe 11453 recorded significantly higher shoot population (167.51 thousand per ha) and Cane yield (107.19 t/ha) as compared to CoSe 08452 and at par with CoS 9232 but effect on NMC was recorded significantly higher in variety CoSe 11453 (144.93 thousand per ha) than other varieties. 125 per cent RDF treatment resulted in significantly higher germination as compared with 75 per cent RDF and at par with 100 per cent RDF. Different fertilizer doses has significantly on shoot population which was significantly higher in 125 per cent RDF as compared to 75 per cent RDF but at par with 100 per cent RDF. NMC (145.02 thousand per ha) and Cane yield (119.18 t/ha) were noted significantly higher in 125 per cent RDF treatment over other fertility doses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Varieties did not significantly alter shoot population, NMC or cane yield in 2015–16.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
shoot population, NMC and cane yielde0
Direction
non significante0
Qualifier
genotype/varietiese0

Verbatim

e0

“Effect of genotype/varieties on shoot population, NMC and cane yield was non significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CoS 09232 had higher germination percentage than other varieties in 2015–16.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
CoS 09232e0
Outcome
Germination per cente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other genotypes/varietiese0

Verbatim

e0

“Germination per cent was observed significantly higher in genotype CoS 09232 as compared to other genotypes/varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

125% fertilizer dose gave higher germination than 75% and 100% doses.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
125 per cent recommend dose of fertilizere0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
75 and 100 per cent RDFe0

Verbatim

e0

“At 125 per cent recommend dose of fertilizer, germination, shoot population, NMC and cane yield were significantly higher as compared to 75 and 100 per cent RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

125% fertilizer dose gave higher shoot population, though it was statistically at par with 100% RDF.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
125 per cent recommend dose of fertilizere0
Outcome
shoot populatione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
statistically at par with 100 per cent RDF treatmente0
Comparator
75 and 100 per cent RDFe0

Verbatim

e0

“At 125 per cent recommend dose of fertilizer, germination, shoot population, NMC and cane yield were significantly higher as compared to 75 and 100 per cent RDF, however, the shoot population was statistically at par with 100 per cent RDF treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1293 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

125% fertilizer dose gave higher NMC than 75% and 100% RDF.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
125 per cent recommend dose of fertilizere0
Outcome
NMCe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
75 and 100 per cent RDFe0

Verbatim

e0

“At 125 per cent recommend dose of fertilizer, germination, shoot population, NMC and cane yield were significantly higher as compared to 75 and 100 per cent RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

125% fertilizer dose gave higher cane yield than 75% and 100% RDF.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
125 per cent recommend dose of fertilizere0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
75 and 100 per cent RDFe0

Verbatim

e0

“At 125 per cent recommend dose of fertilizer, germination, shoot population, NMC and cane yield were significantly higher as compared to 75 and 100 per cent RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Varieties did not significantly differ in germination in 2016–17.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
non significante0

Verbatim

e0

“Effect of varieties on germination was noted non significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1524 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CoSe 11453 had higher shoot population than CoSe 08452.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
CoSe 11453e0
Outcome
shoot populatione0
Direction
highere0
Value
167.51 thousand per hae0
Comparator
CoSe 08452e0

Verbatim

e0

“Variety CoSe 11453 recorded significantly higher shoot population (167.51 thousand per ha) and Cane yield (107.19 t/ha) as compared to CoSe 08452 and at par with CoS 9232”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1696 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CoSe 11453 had higher cane yield than CoSe 08452.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
CoSe 11453e0
Outcome
Cane yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
107.19 t/hae0
Comparator
CoSe 08452e0

Verbatim

e0

“Variety CoSe 11453 recorded significantly higher shoot population (167.51 thousand per ha) and Cane yield (107.19 t/ha) as compared to CoSe 08452 and at par with CoS 9232”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1696 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CoSe 11453 had higher NMC than other varieties.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
CoSe 11453e0
Outcome
NMCe0
Direction
highere0
Value
144.93 thousand per hae0
Comparator
other varietiese0

Verbatim

e0

“effect on NMC was recorded significantly higher in variety CoSe 11453 (144.93 thousand per ha) than other varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1701–1816 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

125% RDF increased germination over 75% RDF and was at par with 100% RDF in 2016–17.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
125 per cent RDF treatmente0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at par with 100 per cent RDFe0
Comparator
75 per cent RDFe0

Verbatim

e0

“125 per cent RDF treatment resulted in significantly higher germination as compared with 75 per cent RDF and at par with 100 per cent RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1818–1955 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

125% RDF increased shoot population over 75% RDF and was at par with 100% RDF.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
125 per cent RDFe0
Outcome
shoot populatione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at par with 100 per cent RDFe0
Comparator
75 per cent RDFe0

Verbatim

e0

“shoot population which was significantly higher in 125 per cent RDF as compared to 75 per cent RDF but at par with 100 per cent RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2005–2136 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

125% RDF gave higher NMC than other fertility doses.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
125 per cent RDF treatmente0
Outcome
NMCe0
Direction
highere0
Value
145.02 thousand per hae0
Comparator
other fertility dosese0

Verbatim

e0

“NMC (145.02 thousand per ha) and Cane yield (119.18 t/ha) were noted significantly higher in 125 per cent RDF treatment over other fertility doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2138–2284 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

125% RDF gave higher cane yield than other fertility doses.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
125 per cent RDF treatmente0
Outcome
Cane yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
119.18 t/hae0
Comparator
other fertility dosese0

Verbatim

e0

“NMC (145.02 thousand per ha) and Cane yield (119.18 t/ha) were noted significantly higher in 125 per cent RDF treatment over other fertility doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2138–2284 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑

fertilization · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 26 positive, 5 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.