Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Influence of pulsing and holding solutions in vase-life of Gladiolus cv. American beauty

Sachin Sharma; Indrajit Sarkar

14
claims
31
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The results revealed that the vase life were found maximum (11.37days) with the 10% sucrose +8-HQ 200ppm in the factor A. In case of factor B Silver Nitrate @ 50ppm gave the better vase life of (10.80days). In the interaction effect treatment combination 8% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm + Citric acid @ 2000ppm gave the maximum vase life of (11.94days).In the factor A the percentage of floret opening was recorded maximum ( 93.10%) in 10% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm and in the factor B Citric acid @ 2000ppm gave the maximum (89.28%). In case of interaction 8% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm + Citric acid @ 2000ppm gave the maximum of (95.21%).Diameter of floret were found maximum (12.36cm) with the 2% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm in factor A and in factor B it was found maximum (11.71cm) with Aluminum sulphate @ 300ppm.in case of interaction treatment combination maximum diameter (13.18cm) were found with 2% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm + Aluminum sulphate @ 300ppm. In the water relation factor A 8% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm and factor B Silver Nitrate @ 50ppm showed the remarkable influence on water uptake (61.7ml) and water balance (0.981) as individual and in the interaction effect also. The minimum water losses (60.86ml, 60.99ml) were observed with the factor A 8% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm and factor B Silver Nitrate @ 50ppm but in case of interaction the minimum loss (60.36ml) were found with the distilled water + Silver Nitrate @ 50ppm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gladiolus vase life was maximum (11.37 days) with 10% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm among the factor A treatments.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
10% sucrose +8-HQ 200ppme0
Outcome
vase lifee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
11.37dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the vase life were found maximum (11.37days) with the 10% sucrose +8-HQ 200ppm in the factor A”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 26–120 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silver nitrate at 50ppm (factor B) gave the better Gladiolus vase life, 10.80 days.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
Silver Nitrate @ 50ppme0
Outcome
vase lifee0
Direction
bettere0
Value
10.80dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of factor B Silver Nitrate @ 50ppm gave the better vase life of (10.80days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–205 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the interaction, 8% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm + citric acid at 2000ppm gave the maximum Gladiolus vase life, 11.94 days.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
8% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm + Citric acid @ 2000ppme0
Outcome
vase lifee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
11.94dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the interaction effect treatment combination 8% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm + Citric acid @ 2000ppm gave the maximum vase life of (11.94days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–345 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Percentage of floret opening was maximum (93.10%) with 10% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm among the factor A treatments.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
10% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppme0
Outcome
percentage of floret openinge0
Direction
maximume0
Value
93.10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the percentage of floret opening was recorded maximum ( 93.10%) in 10% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–454 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Citric acid at 2000ppm (factor B) gave the maximum percentage of floret opening, 89.28%.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
Citric acid @ 2000ppme1
Outcome
percentage of floret openinge0
Direction
maximume1
Value
89.28%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percentage of floret opening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–394 · show in text ↑
e1

“in the factor B Citric acid @ 2000ppm gave the maximum (89.28%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–522 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the interaction, 8% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm + citric acid at 2000ppm gave the maximum percentage of floret opening, 95.21%.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
8% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm + Citric acid @ 2000ppme1
Outcome
percentage of floret openinge0
Direction
maximume1
Value
95.21%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percentage of floret opening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–394 · show in text ↑
e1

“In case of interaction 8% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm + Citric acid @ 2000ppm gave the maximum of (95.21%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Floret diameter was maximum (12.36 cm) with 2% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm among the factor A treatments.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
2% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppme0
Outcome
Diameter of florete0
Direction
maximume0
Value
12.36cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diameter of floret were found maximum (12.36cm) with the 2% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm in factor A”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–718 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminum sulphate at 300ppm (factor B) gave the maximum floret diameter, 11.71 cm.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
Aluminum sulphate @ 300ppme1
Outcome
Diameter of florete0
Direction
maximume1
Value
11.71cme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diameter of floret”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–643 · show in text ↑
e1

“in factor B it was found maximum (11.71cm) with Aluminum sulphate @ 300ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the interaction, 2% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm + aluminum sulphate at 300ppm gave the maximum floret diameter, 13.18 cm.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
2% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm + Aluminum sulphate @ 300ppme0
Outcome
diametere0
Direction
maximume0
Value
13.18cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum diameter (13.18cm) were found with 2% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm + Aluminum sulphate @ 300ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Factor A 8% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm and factor B silver nitrate at 50ppm showed a remarkable influence on Gladiolus water uptake (61.7 ml).

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
8% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm and factor B Silver Nitrate @ 50ppme0
Outcome
water uptakee0
Value
61.7mle0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“factor A 8% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm and factor B Silver Nitrate @ 50ppm showed the remarkable influence on water uptake (61.7ml) and water balance (0.981)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1115 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Factor A 8% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm and factor B silver nitrate at 50ppm showed a remarkable influence on Gladiolus water balance (0.981).

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
8% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm and factor B Silver Nitrate @ 50ppme0
Outcome
water balancee0
Value
0.981e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“factor A 8% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm and factor B Silver Nitrate @ 50ppm showed the remarkable influence on water uptake (61.7ml) and water balance (0.981)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1115 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The minimum water loss (60.86 ml) was observed with factor A 8% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
8% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppme0
Outcome
water lossese0
Direction
minimume0
Value
60.86mle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The minimum water losses (60.86ml, 60.99ml) were observed with the factor A 8% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm and factor B Silver Nitrate @ 50ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The minimum water loss (60.99 ml) was observed with factor B silver nitrate at 50ppm.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
Silver Nitrate @ 50ppme0
Outcome
water lossese0
Direction
minimume0
Value
60.99mle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The minimum water losses (60.86ml, 60.99ml) were observed with the factor A 8% sucrose + 8-HQ 200ppm and factor B Silver Nitrate @ 50ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the interaction, the minimum water loss (60.36 ml) was found with distilled water + silver nitrate at 50ppm.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
distilled water + Silver Nitrate @ 50ppme0
Outcome
losse0
Direction
minimume0
Value
60.36mle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in case of interaction the minimum loss (60.36ml) were found with the distilled water + Silver Nitrate @ 50ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1417 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · growth · GladiolusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sulfate · growth · GladiolusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

citric acid · quality: postharvest · GladiolusResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

silver(1+) nitrate · physiology: water · GladiolusResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

silver(1+) nitrate · yield · GladiolusResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

silver(1+) nitrate · quality: postharvest · GladiolusResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sucrose · physiology: water · GladiolusResults agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

sucrose · growth · GladiolusResults agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.