Paper · 1999 · PubMed

Phasic temperature and photoperiod control for soybean using a modified CROPGRO model.

J Cavazzoni; T Volk; B Bugbee; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A modified CROPGRO model is applied to phasic temperature and photoperiod control in order to optimize soybean production for NASA's program in Advanced Life Support. Baseline model simulations were established using data from soybean temperature experiments conducted at elevated CO2 levels (1100 micromol mol-1) at Utah State University (USU). The model simulations show little advantage in using phasic temperature control alone to increase average seed yield rate over the USU experimental values. However, simulations that combine phasic control of temperature (two phases) and photoperiod (two phases) do indicate the potential to improve seed yield (in g m-2 day-1) by approximately 15% over those currently obtained experimentally at USU for soybean cultivar Hoyt. This temperature and photoperiod phasing is experimentally practical. The simulations suggest extending photoperiods over those typically used experimentally during later phases of the crop life cycle, which would lengthen grain fill duration and thereby increase mass per seed. The model simulations indicate that the timing, and duration of extended photoperiods would be very important due to possible reductions in seed number m-2. Besides affecting seed yield directly, the model simulations suggest that such reductions may also cause feedback inhibition of photosynthesis due to low seed sink strength at elevated CO2 levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature phasing alone showed little advantage for average seed yield rate over experimental values.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
phasic temperature control alonee0
Outcome
average seed yield ratee0
Direction
little advantagee0
Comparator
USU experimental valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The model simulations show little advantage in using phasic temperature control alone to increase average seed yield rate over the USU experimental values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–501 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Combined temperature and photoperiod phasing could improve seed yield by approximately 15% over USU values for Hoyt.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Material
Hoyte0
Treatment
phasic control of temperature (two phases) and photoperiod (two phases)e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
improvee0
Value
approximately 15%e0
Comparator
those currently obtained experimentally at USUe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“simulations that combine phasic control of temperature (two phases) and photoperiod (two phases) do indicate the potential to improve seed yield (in g m-2 day-1) by approximately 15% over those currently obtained experimentally at USU for soybean cultivar Hoyt.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–772 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Longer later photoperiods were predicted to lengthen grain filling.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
extending photoperiodse0
Outcome
grain fill duratione0
Direction
lengthene0
Comparator
those typically used experimentallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“extending photoperiods over those typically used experimentally during later phases of the crop life cycle, which would lengthen grain fill duration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Longer later photoperiods were predicted to increase mass per seed.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
mass per seede0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
lengthen grain fill duratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which would lengthen grain fill duration and thereby increase mass per seed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1051 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Extended photoperiod timing and duration could reduce seed number per square metre.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
extended photoperiodse0
Outcome
seed number m-2e0
Direction
reductionse0
Qualifier
possiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the timing, and duration of extended photoperiods would be very important due to possible reductions in seed number m-2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–54 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced seed sink strength at elevated CO2 may feed back to inhibit photosynthesis.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Qualifier
low seed sink strength at elevated CO2 levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“such reductions may also cause feedback inhibition of photosynthesis due to low seed sink strength at elevated CO2 levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1405 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–54 · show in text ↑