Paper · 2018 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Rational Application of Fertilizer Nitrogen to Soil in Combination With Foliar Zn Spraying Improved Zn Nutritional Quality of Wheat Grains

Haiyong Xia; Yanfang Xue; Yanfang Xue; et al.

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To alleviate human zinc (Zn) deficiency, it is worthy to develop rational agronomic managements to achieve high yielding and high resource-use efficiency wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grains biofortified with Zn. Effects of application of three rates of nitrogen (N) fertilizer (75, 200 and 275 kg·ha–1) to soil in combination with three foliar applications (deionized water, Zn alone, and a combination of Zn and sucrose) on grain yield, yield components, grain Zn concentration, protein, phytic acid (PA), phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca), and carbon (C), as well as on Zn bioavailability, were investigated in four wheat cultivars (‘Jinan 17’, ‘Jimai 20’, ‘Jimai 22’ and ‘Luyuan 502’) under field conditions. Enhanced N increased Zn and protein concentrations as well as bioavailability; excessive N input did not result in further improvements. Zinc spraying was more effective than soil fertilizer N application, the spray of Zn (with or without sucrose) increased grain Zn concentrations by 11.1–15.6 mg·kg–1 (27.1%–38.1%), and increased grain Zn bioavailability, estimated using total daily absorbed Zn (TAZ) and molar ratios of PA/Zn) and PA  Ca/Zn, by 0.4–0.6 mg d–1 (28.6–42.9%), 23.1%–27.4% and 24.0%–28.0%, respectively. Remarkably, increases caused by ‘Zn + sucrose’ were higher than spraying Zn alone. Grain Zn bioavailability was more sensitive to the selection of cultivar than Zn concentrations. Among cultivars, the higher the grain yields and concentrations of antinutritional compounds, the lower the grain Zn nutritional quality would be. 200 kg N ha–1 application rate in combination with foliar spraying of ‘Zn + sucrose’ maximized grain Zn concentrations of ‘Jinan 17’, ‘Jimai 20’, ‘Jimai 22’ and ‘Luyuan 502’ to be 59.4, 56.9, 55.8 and 60.9 mg kg–1, respectively, achieving the target value for biofortification. Additionally, PA/Zn and PA  Ca/Zn of ‘Jinan 17’, ‘Jimai 20’ and ‘Luyuan 502’ were less than 15 and 200, and TAZ was maximized to be 2.2, 2.0 and 2.1 mg d–1, respectively, indicating higher bioavailability. Therefore, optimal soil N and foliar Zn management together with suitable cultivars maintained high grain yield with lower N input and could substantially increase grain Zn nutritional quality simultaneously.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced N increased grain Zn and protein concentrations as well as Zn bioavailability.

Treatment
Enhanced Ne1
Outcome
Zn and protein concentrations as well as bioavailabilitye1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–138 · show in text ↑
e1

“Enhanced N increased Zn and protein concentrations as well as bioavailability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excessive N input did not result in further improvements.

Treatment
excessive N inpute1
Outcome
further improvementse1
Direction
did not result ine1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–138 · show in text ↑
e1

“excessive N input did not result in further improvements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc spraying was more effective than soil fertilizer N application.

Treatment
Zinc sprayinge1
Outcome
Zinc spraying was more effective than soil fertilizer N applicatione1
Direction
more effectivee1
Comparator
soil fertilizer N applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–138 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zinc spraying was more effective than soil fertilizer N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–911 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying Zn (with or without sucrose) increased grain Zn concentrations by 11.1–15.6 mg·kg–1 relative to deionized water.

Treatment
the spray of Zn (with or without sucrose)e1
Outcome
grain Zn concentrationse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
11.1–15.6 mg·kg–1e1
Comparator
deionized watere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–138 · show in text ↑
e1

“the spray of Zn (with or without sucrose) increased grain Zn concentrations by 11.1–15.6 mg·kg–1 (27.1%–38.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1023 · show in text ↑
e2

“foliar applications (deionized water, Zn alone, and a combination of Zn and sucrose)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–421 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn plus sucrose spraying increased grain Zn more than Zn spraying alone.

Treatment
Zn + sucrosee1
Outcome
increasese1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
spraying Zn alonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–138 · show in text ↑
e1

“Remarkably, increases caused by ‘Zn + sucrose’ were higher than spraying Zn alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1310 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain Zn bioavailability was more sensitive to cultivar selection than to Zn concentration.

Treatment
selection of cultivare1
Outcome
Grain Zn bioavailabilitye1
Direction
more sensitivee1
Comparator
Zn concentrationse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–138 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain Zn bioavailability was more sensitive to the selection of cultivar than Zn concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1407 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among cultivars, higher grain yield and antinutritional compound concentrations were associated with lower grain Zn nutritional quality.

Compound
antinutritional compoundse1
Outcome
grain Zn nutritional qualitye1
Direction
lowere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–138 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among cultivars, the higher the grain yields and concentrations of antinutritional compounds, the lower the grain Zn nutritional quality would be”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

200 kg N ha–1 with foliar Zn + sucrose maximized grain Zn concentration of Jinan 17 at 59.4 mg kg–1.

Material
Jinan 17e1
Treatment
200 kg N ha–1 application rate in combination with foliar sprayinge1
Outcome
grain Zn concentrationse1
Direction
maximizede1
Value
59.4e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–138 · show in text ↑
e1

“200 kg N ha–1 application rate in combination with foliar spraying of ‘Zn + sucrose’ maximized grain Zn concentrations of ‘Jinan 17’, ‘Jimai 20’, ‘Jimai 22’ and ‘Luyuan 502’ to be 59.4, 56.9, 55.8 and 60.9 mg kg–1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

200 kg N ha–1 with foliar Zn + sucrose maximized grain Zn concentration of Jimai 20 at 56.9 mg kg–1.

Material
Jimai 20e1
Treatment
200 kg N ha–1 application rate in combination with foliar sprayinge1
Outcome
grain Zn concentrationse1
Direction
maximizede1
Value
56.9e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–138 · show in text ↑
e1

“200 kg N ha–1 application rate in combination with foliar spraying of ‘Zn + sucrose’ maximized grain Zn concentrations of ‘Jinan 17’, ‘Jimai 20’, ‘Jimai 22’ and ‘Luyuan 502’ to be 59.4, 56.9, 55.8 and 60.9 mg kg–1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

200 kg N ha–1 with foliar Zn + sucrose maximized grain Zn concentration of Jimai 22 at 55.8 mg kg–1.

Material
Jimai 22e1
Treatment
200 kg N ha–1 application rate in combination with foliar sprayinge1
Outcome
grain Zn concentrationse1
Direction
maximizede1
Value
55.8e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–138 · show in text ↑
e1

“200 kg N ha–1 application rate in combination with foliar spraying of ‘Zn + sucrose’ maximized grain Zn concentrations of ‘Jinan 17’, ‘Jimai 20’, ‘Jimai 22’ and ‘Luyuan 502’ to be 59.4, 56.9, 55.8 and 60.9 mg kg–1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

200 kg N ha–1 with foliar Zn + sucrose maximized grain Zn concentration of Luyuan 502 at 60.9 mg kg–1.

Material
Luyuan 502e1
Treatment
200 kg N ha–1 application rate in combination with foliar sprayinge1
Outcome
grain Zn concentrationse1
Direction
maximizede1
Value
60.9e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–138 · show in text ↑
e1

“200 kg N ha–1 application rate in combination with foliar spraying of ‘Zn + sucrose’ maximized grain Zn concentrations of ‘Jinan 17’, ‘Jimai 20’, ‘Jimai 22’ and ‘Luyuan 502’ to be 59.4, 56.9, 55.8 and 60.9 mg kg–1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1783 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal soil N and foliar Zn management with suitable cultivars is recommended to maintain high yield with lower N input and increase grain Zn nutritional quality.

Treatment
optimal soil N and foliar Zn managemente1
Outcome
grain Zn nutritional qualitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–138 · show in text ↑
e1

“Therefore, optimal soil N and foliar Zn management together with suitable cultivars maintained high grain yield with lower N input and could substantially increase grain Zn nutritional quality simultaneously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2041–2248 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Foliar chelated zinc yielded about two-fold greater shoot zinc concentrations than root zinc supply or foliar ZnO.

    Zinc Mobility in Wheat: Uptake and Distribution of Zinc Applied to Leaves or Roots · 2001 · compared with plants supplied with Zn in the root environment or via foliar spray of ZnO

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

sucrose · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Foliar ZnSO 4 yielded about two-fold greater shoot zinc concentrations than root zinc supply or foliar ZnO.

    Zinc Mobility in Wheat: Uptake and Distribution of Zinc Applied to Leaves or Roots · 2001 · compared with plants supplied with Zn in the root environment or via foliar spray of ZnO

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

479 papers: 410 positive, 69 negative or no effect

409 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

475 papers more in this group

See all 479 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.