Paper · 2018 · Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry

Modification of the proportion of extractable and bound condensed tannins in birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) and sainfoin (Onobrychis viicifolia) during wilting, ensiling and pelleting processes

Marion Girard; Frigga Dohme-Meier; Silvia Kragten; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Condensed tannins (CT) in legume forages vary not only in concentration and structure, but also in the portion of soluble and protein- and fibre-bound fractions. This study aimed to assess the changes in the total CT level as well as relative abundance of the three CT fractions from fresh to wilted, ensiled or pelleted legumes like in birds foot trefoil (two cultivars) and in sainfoin (one cultivar). Each legume underwent three consecutive harvests, of which the first two were wilted. Additionally, wilted legumes were either ensiled (first harvest) or transformed into dehydrated pellets (second harvest). For each harvest, total CT and the percentage of soluble, protein- and fibre-bound CT differed (P < 0.01) among plants. The total CT content was similar after wilting but was lower (P < 0.05) after ensiling. After wilting, ensiling and pelleting the portion of soluble CT was lower in favour of protein-bound CT portion. However, time of harvest affected (P < 0.05) total CT and the percentage of soluble and protein-bound CT. Thus, measuring the bound-fraction should not be ignored in the determination of CT content since this fraction, together with the soluble fraction, might protect protein from ruminal degradation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total condensed tannins and soluble, protein-bound, and fibre-bound fractions differed among plants.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Outcome
total CT and the percentage of soluble, protein- and fibre-bound CTe0
Value
P < 0.01e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“For each harvest, total CT and the percentage of soluble, protein- and fibre-bound CT differed (P < 0.01) among plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–731 · show in text ↑
t0

“birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) and sainfoin (Onobrychis viicifolia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total condensed tannin content was similar after wilting.

Taxon
birdsfoot trefoilt0
Treatment
wiltinge0
Outcome
total CT contente0
Direction
similare0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The total CT content was similar after wilting but was lower (P < 0.05) after ensiling.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) and sainfoin (Onobrychis viicifolia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ensiling lowered total condensed tannin content.

Taxon
birdsfoot trefoilt0
Treatment
ensilinge0
Outcome
total CT contente0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The total CT content was similar after wilting but was lower (P < 0.05) after ensiling.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) and sainfoin (Onobrychis viicifolia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wilting, ensiling and pelleting lowered the soluble condensed tannin fraction.

Taxon
birdsfoot trefoilt0
Treatment
wilting, ensiling and pelletinge0
Outcome
portion of soluble CTe0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“After wilting, ensiling and pelleting the portion of soluble CT was lower in favour of protein-bound CT portion.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–932 · show in text ↑
t0

“birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) and sainfoin (Onobrychis viicifolia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wilting, ensiling and pelleting favoured the protein-bound condensed tannin fraction.

Taxon
birdsfoot trefoilt0
Treatment
wilting, ensiling and pelletinge0
Outcome
protein-bound CT portione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“After wilting, ensiling and pelleting the portion of soluble CT was lower in favour of protein-bound CT portion.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–932 · show in text ↑
t0

“birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) and sainfoin (Onobrychis viicifolia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–152 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest time affected total condensed tannins and soluble and protein-bound fractions.

Taxon
birdsfoot trefoilt0
Treatment
time of harveste0
Outcome
total CT and the percentage of soluble and protein-bound CTe0
Value
P < 0.05e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“time of harvest affected (P < 0.05) total CT and the percentage of soluble and protein-bound CT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) and sainfoin (Onobrychis viicifolia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–152 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend measuring bound tannin fractions when determining condensed tannin content.

Taxon
birdsfoot trefoilt0
Outcome
measuring the bound-fraction should not be ignorede0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“measuring the bound-fraction should not be ignored in the determination of CT content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) and sainfoin (Onobrychis viicifolia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–152 · show in text ↑