Paper · 2018 · Science Technology and Arts Research Journal

Effects of Blended Fertilizer Rate and Time of Application on Growth and Yield of Sugarcane Ratoon Crop at Arjo-Sugar Factory, Western Ethiopia

Dereje Legesse; Hirpa Legesse; Negash Geleta

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Lack of appropriate agronomic practices related to fertilizer management is a major constraint to enhancing sugarcane yield in Ethiopia. The effect of optimum rate and time of blended fertilizer application on yield and quality of ratoon commercial crop is not known at Arjo Didessa Sugar factory. Therefore, the field experiments were conducted with the objectives of assessing the effect of blended fertilizer at different rate and time of application on Ratoon sugarcane growth and yield of cane. The treatments consisted of eight levels of blended fertilizer with N (0, 150, 111N, 200 and 103N, 250 and 94N, 300 and 85N, 350 and 76.4N, 400 and 68N kg ha-1 and recommended fertilizer rate) and two times of application (one and two month after harvest). The field experiments were laid out as Randomized complete block design in a factorial arrangement and replicated three times. A sugarcane cultivar named N-14 was used as a ratoon material. Analysis of variance of the data revealed that the blended fertilizer application rate had significant effect on ratoon weight per stalk, node number, plant height, node length and cane yield sugar yield. Blended fertilizer rate and time of application and their interaction showed only highly significant on stalk girth and stalk population and interaction was significant effect on weight per stalk and node length at the time of harvest. However, application of blended fertilizer at different time and their interaction on plant height, cane yield and node number did not showed significant effect. Blended fertilizer treatment with the rate of 250kg ha-1 blended fertilizer mixed with 94kg N ha-1 at one month after harvest resulted in higher ratoon cane weight per stalk, stalk girth, cane yield, sugar yield, node length, stalk population and node number. Therefore, highest cane yield was recorded at late application time of blended fertilizer at lower dose and higher dose of nitrogen. Therefore, treating the ratoon cane by 250kg ha-1 BLF with 94kg N ha-1 at one month after harvest had evidently the advantage of improving ratoon cane growth and yield performance

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Blended fertilizer application rate had a significant effect on ratoon weight per stalk, node number and plant height.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
blended fertilizer application ratee1
Outcome
ratoon weight per stalk, node number, plant heighte1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane Ratoon Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“the blended fertilizer application rate had significant effect on ratoon weight per stalk, node number, plant height, node length and cane yield sugar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Blended fertilizer application rate had a significant effect on node length, cane yield and sugar yield.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
blended fertilizer application ratee1
Outcome
node length and cane yield sugar yielde1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane Ratoon Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“the blended fertilizer application rate had significant effect on ratoon weight per stalk, node number, plant height, node length and cane yield sugar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Blended fertilizer rate and time of application and their interaction were highly significant for stalk girth and stalk population.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Blended fertilizer rate and time of applicatione1
Outcome
stalk girth and stalk populatione1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane Ratoon Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Blended fertilizer rate and time of application and their interaction showed only highly significant on stalk girth and stalk population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of fertilizer rate and application time had a significant effect on weight per stalk and node length at harvest.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
interactione1
Outcome
weight per stalk and node lengthe1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane Ratoon Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“interaction was significant effect on weight per stalk and node length at the time of harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application time of blended fertilizer and its interaction with rate had no significant effect on plant height, cane yield and node number.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
blended fertilizer at different timee1
Outcome
plant height, cane yield and node numbere1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane Ratoon Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of blended fertilizer at different time and their interaction on plant height, cane yield and node number did not showed significant effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 250 kg ha-1 blended fertilizer with 94 kg N ha-1 one month after harvest gave higher ratoon cane weight per stalk, stalk girth and cane yield.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
250kg ha-1 blended fertilizer mixed with 94kg N ha-1 at one month after harveste1
Outcome
ratoon cane weight per stalk, stalk girth, cane yielde1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane Ratoon Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Blended fertilizer treatment with the rate of 250kg ha-1 blended fertilizer mixed with 94kg N ha-1 at one month after harvest resulted in higher ratoon cane weight per stalk, stalk girth, cane yield, sugar yield, node length, stalk population and node number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave higher sugar yield, node length and stalk population.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
250kg ha-1 blended fertilizer mixed with 94kg N ha-1 at one month after harveste1
Outcome
sugar yield, node length, stalk populatione1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane Ratoon Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Blended fertilizer treatment with the rate of 250kg ha-1 blended fertilizer mixed with 94kg N ha-1 at one month after harvest resulted in higher ratoon cane weight per stalk, stalk girth, cane yield, sugar yield, node length, stalk population and node number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave higher node number.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
250kg ha-1 blended fertilizer mixed with 94kg N ha-1 at one month after harveste1
Outcome
node numbere1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane Ratoon Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Blended fertilizer treatment with the rate of 250kg ha-1 blended fertilizer mixed with 94kg N ha-1 at one month after harvest resulted in higher ratoon cane weight per stalk, stalk girth, cane yield, sugar yield, node length, stalk population and node number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1808 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest cane yield was recorded with late application of blended fertilizer at a lower dose and a higher dose of nitrogen.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Outcome
highest cane yielde1
Qualifier
late application time of blended fertilizer at lower dose and higher dose of nitrogene1

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane Ratoon Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest cane yield was recorded at late application time of blended fertilizer at lower dose and higher dose of nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1821–1941 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 250 kg ha-1 blended fertilizer with 94 kg N ha-1 one month after harvest to improve ratoon cane growth and yield.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Outcome
ratoon cane growth and yield performancee1

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane Ratoon Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“treating the ratoon cane by 250kg ha-1 BLF with 94kg N ha-1 at one month after harvest had evidently the advantage of improving ratoon cane growth and yield performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1954–2122 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

nitrogen · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 26 positive, 5 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.