Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Review on climatic abnormalities impact on area, productivity of central India and strategies of mitigating technology on yield and benefits of black gram

Sudhir Singh; Y. Santosh Singh; SS Tomar

17
claims
35
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The major reasons of fluctuating cost and availability of pulses are climatic abnormalities in India. The climatic abnormalities are more vulnerable on pulse crops compared with oilseeds and cereals. A study was conducted on climatic change abnormalities impact on area and productivity after 3 decades of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh states of Central India and mitigation technology on yield and benefits of black gram. Absolute and relative changes in average area was slightly increased by 49.2% against base years (1980 to 83) area (532.6 thousand ha), while productivity increased by 40.3% compared with base year yield (217.7 kg/ha). Study showed significant variability in area (CV=17.7%) and productivity (CV=13.8%) of black gram of Central India. The maximum absolute and relative increased in area was 139.1 thousand ha and 146.5% of Malwa plateau, whereas absolute and relative changes decreased in area of Chhattisgarh plain (-13.1 thousand ha) and Bastar plateau (-19.2%) compared with base years, respectively. Maximum absolute and relative change in increase in productivity of Vindhyan plateau was 285.6 kg/ha and 102.8% compared with base year average yield (258.3 kg/ha), while decreasing of absolute and relative change in productivity of Gird region compared of base years. Results of on farm trials showed that adoptions of mitigation of technologies of climatic abnormalities significantly influenced grain yield of black gram. Study revealed that among abiotic and biotic stresses, major losses in production of grain of black gram by water submergence during rainy season (33.0%) followed by drought during grain filling stage in summer (23.2%) and yellow vein mosaic (34.8%) followed by pod borer (30.1%) compared with control, respectively. Escaping of abiotic and biotic stresses with improved technologies was enhanced grain yield from 21.4-49.2% and 43.0-53.5% compared with control, respectively. Similarly, using improved techniques for mitigation of climatic abnormalities gave higher net returns and B:C ratio compared to control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average black gram area in central India rose 49.2% relative to the base years 1980 to 83.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Outcome
average areae1
Direction
increasede1
Value
49.2%e1
Comparator
base years (1980 to 83)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–154 · show in text ↑
e1

“Absolute and relative changes in average area was slightly increased by 49.2% against base years (1980 to 83) area (532.6 thousand ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–559 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black gram productivity in central India rose 40.3% relative to the base year yield.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Outcome
productivitye2
Direction
increasede2
Value
40.3%e2
Comparator
base year yield (217.7 kg/ha)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–154 · show in text ↑
e2

“productivity increased by 40.3% compared with base year yield (217.7 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–642 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Black gram area showed significant variability in central India (CV 17.7%).

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Outcome
variability in areae3
Value
CV=17.7%e3
Setting
Central Indiae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–154 · show in text ↑
e3

“Study showed significant variability in area (CV=17.7%) and productivity (CV=13.8%) of black gram of Central India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–758 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Black gram productivity showed significant variability in central India (CV 13.8%).

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Outcome
productivitye3
Value
CV=13.8%e3
Setting
Central Indiae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–154 · show in text ↑
e3

“Study showed significant variability in area (CV=17.7%) and productivity (CV=13.8%) of black gram of Central India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–758 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum increase in black gram area was on the Malwa plateau.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Outcome
areae4
Direction
increasede4
Value
139.1 thousand ha and 146.5%e4
Setting
Malwa plateaue4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–154 · show in text ↑
e4

“The maximum absolute and relative increased in area was 139.1 thousand ha and 146.5% of Malwa plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–861 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black gram area decreased in the Chhattisgarh plain (-13.1 thousand ha) compared with base years.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Outcome
areae5
Direction
decreasede5
Value
-13.1 thousand hae5
Comparator
base yearse5
Setting
Chhattisgarh plaine5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–154 · show in text ↑
e5

“absolute and relative changes decreased in area of Chhattisgarh plain (-13.1 thousand ha) and Bastar plateau (-19.2%) compared with base years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1013 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black gram area decreased in the Bastar plateau (-19.2%) compared with base years.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Outcome
areae5
Direction
decreasede5
Value
-19.2%e5
Comparator
base yearse5
Setting
Bastar plateaue5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–154 · show in text ↑
e5

“absolute and relative changes decreased in area of Chhattisgarh plain (-13.1 thousand ha) and Bastar plateau (-19.2%) compared with base years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1013 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum increase in black gram productivity was on the Vindhyan plateau.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Outcome
productivitye6
Direction
increasee6
Value
285.6 kg/ha and 102.8%e6
Comparator
base year average yield (258.3 kg/ha)e6
Setting
Vindhyan plateaue6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–154 · show in text ↑
e6

“Maximum absolute and relative change in increase in productivity of Vindhyan plateau was 285.6 kg/ha and 102.8% compared with base year average yield (258.3 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1192 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black gram productivity decreased in the Gird region compared with base years.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Outcome
productivitye7
Direction
decreasinge7
Comparator
base yearse7
Setting
Gird regione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–154 · show in text ↑
e7

“while decreasing of absolute and relative change in productivity of Gird region compared of base years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1296 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adoption of mitigation technologies for climatic abnormalities significantly influenced black gram grain yield in on-farm trials.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Treatment
adoptions of mitigation of technologies of climatic abnormalitiese1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Setting
on farm trialse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–154 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results of on farm trials showed that adoptions of mitigation of technologies of climatic abnormalities significantly influenced grain yield of black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1452 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water submergence during the rainy season caused a 33.0% loss in black gram grain production.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Treatment
water submergence during rainy seasone2
Outcome
losses in production of graine2
Value
33.0%e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–154 · show in text ↑
e2

“major losses in production of grain of black gram by water submergence during rainy season (33.0%) followed by drought during grain filling stage in summer (23.2%) and yellow vein mosaic (34.8%) followed by pod borer (30.1%) compared with control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1769 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought during the grain filling stage in summer caused a 23.2% loss in black gram grain production.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Organ / stage
grain filling stagee2
Treatment
drought during grain filling stage in summere2
Outcome
losses in production of graine2
Value
23.2%e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–154 · show in text ↑
e2

“major losses in production of grain of black gram by water submergence during rainy season (33.0%) followed by drought during grain filling stage in summer (23.2%) and yellow vein mosaic (34.8%) followed by pod borer (30.1%) compared with control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1769 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow vein mosaic caused a 34.8% loss in black gram grain production.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Interactor
yellow vein mosaice2pathogen
Outcome
losses in production of graine2
Value
34.8%e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–154 · show in text ↑
e2

“major losses in production of grain of black gram by water submergence during rainy season (33.0%) followed by drought during grain filling stage in summer (23.2%) and yellow vein mosaic (34.8%) followed by pod borer (30.1%) compared with control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1769 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod borer caused a 30.1% loss in black gram grain production.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Interactor
pod borere2pest
Outcome
losses in production of graine2
Value
30.1%e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–154 · show in text ↑
e2

“major losses in production of grain of black gram by water submergence during rainy season (33.0%) followed by drought during grain filling stage in summer (23.2%) and yellow vein mosaic (34.8%) followed by pod borer (30.1%) compared with control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1769 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved technologies for escaping abiotic stresses increased black gram grain yield by 21.4-49.2% compared with control.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Treatment
improved technologiese3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
enhancede3
Value
21.4-49.2%e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–154 · show in text ↑
e2

“major losses in production of grain of black gram by water submergence during rainy season (33.0%) followed by drought during grain filling stage in summer (23.2%) and yellow vein mosaic (34.8%) followed by pod borer (30.1%) compared with control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1769 · show in text ↑
e3

“Escaping of abiotic and biotic stresses with improved technologies was enhanced grain yield from 21.4-49.2% and 43.0-53.5% compared with control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1771–1929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved technologies for escaping biotic stresses increased black gram grain yield by 43.0-53.5% compared with control.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Treatment
improved technologiese3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
enhancede3
Value
43.0-53.5%e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–154 · show in text ↑
e3

“Escaping of abiotic and biotic stresses with improved technologies was enhanced grain yield from 21.4-49.2% and 43.0-53.5% compared with control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1771–1929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved techniques for mitigating climatic abnormalities gave higher net returns and B:C ratio than control in black gram.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Treatment
improved techniques for mitigation of climatic abnormalitiese4
Outcome
net returns and B:C ratioe4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–154 · show in text ↑
e4

“using improved techniques for mitigation of climatic abnormalities gave higher net returns and B:C ratio compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1942–2066 · show in text ↑

climate site · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.