Paper · 2018 · HortScience

Effects of High Potassium and Low Temperature on the Growth and Magnesium Nutrition of Different Tomato Cultivars

Huixia Li; Zhujun Chen; Ting Zhou; et al.

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The interaction between potassium (K) and magnesium (Mg) in plants has been intensively studied. However, the responses of different tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.) cultivars to high K levels at low temperatures remained unclear. Herein, a complete randomized hydroponic experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of temperature (25 °C day/18 °C night vs. 15 °C day/8 °C night) and K concentrations (156 mg·L −1 vs. 468 mg·L −1 ) on the growth and Mg nutrition of tomato cultivars Gailiangmaofen (MF) and Jinpeng No. 1 (JP). Compared with the control temperature (25 °C day/18 °C night), the low temperature decreased total biomass, shoot biomass, and Mg uptake in shoot by 17.3%, 24.1%, and 11.8%, respectively; however, the root/shoot ratio was increased. High K had no significant effect on plant growth or biomass compared with the control K concentration (156 mg·L −1 ); however, Mg concentrations and uptake in shoot were significantly lower under high-K treatment. Significant difference was observed for K uptake, but not for Mg uptake, between the two cultivars. There was no significant interaction between temperature and high K on Mg uptake of tomato, so a combined stress of low temperature and high K further inhibited Mg uptake and transport. Low temperature and high K increased the risk of Mg deficiency in tomato.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature decreased tomato total biomass by 17.3% compared with the control temperature.

Treatment
low temperaturee0
Outcome
total biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
17.3%e0
Comparator
control temperaturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the control temperature (25 °C day/18 °C night), the low temperature decreased total biomass, shoot biomass, and Mg uptake in shoot by 17.3%, 24.1%, and 11.8%, respectively; however, the root/shoot ratio was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–764 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature decreased tomato shoot biomass by 24.1% compared with the control temperature.

Treatment
low temperaturee0
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
24.1%e0
Comparator
control temperaturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the control temperature (25 °C day/18 °C night), the low temperature decreased total biomass, shoot biomass, and Mg uptake in shoot by 17.3%, 24.1%, and 11.8%, respectively; however, the root/shoot ratio was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–764 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature decreased Mg uptake in tomato shoot by 11.8% compared with the control temperature.

Treatment
low temperaturee0
Outcome
Mg uptake in shoote0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
11.8%e0
Comparator
control temperaturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the control temperature (25 °C day/18 °C night), the low temperature decreased total biomass, shoot biomass, and Mg uptake in shoot by 17.3%, 24.1%, and 11.8%, respectively; however, the root/shoot ratio was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–764 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature increased the root/shoot ratio of tomato compared with the control temperature.

Treatment
low temperaturee0
Outcome
root/shoot ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control temperaturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the control temperature (25 °C day/18 °C night), the low temperature decreased total biomass, shoot biomass, and Mg uptake in shoot by 17.3%, 24.1%, and 11.8%, respectively; however, the root/shoot ratio was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–764 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High K had no significant effect on tomato plant growth or biomass compared with the control K concentration.

Treatment
High Ke0
Outcome
plant growth or biomasse0
Direction
no significant effecte0
Comparator
control K concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High K had no significant effect on plant growth or biomass compared with the control K concentration (156 mg·L −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–882 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mg concentrations and uptake in tomato shoot were significantly lower under high-K treatment.

Treatment
high-K treatmente0
Outcome
Mg concentrations and uptake in shoote0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mg concentrations and uptake in shoot were significantly lower under high-K treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–978 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–166 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A significant difference in K uptake was observed between the two tomato cultivars.

Material
two cultivarse0
Outcome
K uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant difference was observed for K uptake, but not for Mg uptake, between the two cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1078 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–166 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant difference in Mg uptake was observed between the two tomato cultivars.

Material
two cultivarse0
Outcome
Mg uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant difference was observed for K uptake, but not for Mg uptake, between the two cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1078 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–166 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

There was no significant interaction between temperature and high K on Mg uptake of tomato.

Treatment
temperature and high Ke0
Outcome
Mg uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant interaction between temperature and high K on Mg uptake of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined stress of low temperature and high K further inhibited Mg uptake and transport in tomato.

Treatment
combined stress of low temperature and high Ke0
Outcome
Mg uptake and transporte0
Direction
further inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a combined stress of low temperature and high K further inhibited Mg uptake and transport”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1264 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature and high K increased the risk of Mg deficiency in tomato.

Treatment
Low temperature and high Ke0
Outcome
risk of Mg deficiencye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low temperature and high K increased the risk of Mg deficiency in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1338 · show in text ↑

potassium · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

47 papers: 34 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

cold · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

55 papers: 22 positive, 33 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

cold · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

potassium · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 27 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.