Paper · 2005 · Agritrop (Cirad)

Variation in drought adaptation among closely related early groundnut lines

Danièle Clavel; Ousmane Diouf; Jean-Luc Khalfaoui; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Groundnut is the most important oilseed and cash crop in the Sub-Sahel regions. It is mainly cultivated under late-season drought that occurs during the pod-filling phase and regularly causes great reduction in pod yield. Two sets of extra-early closely related groundnut lines (80 days) were developed in Senegal through back-cross between two productive 90 days cultivars, 55-437 and 73-30, anda precocity donor of 75 days, Chico. However reduced genotypic variability of breeding lines is one of the major drawbacks encountered by breeders when improving materials for physiological traits. The objective was to improve selection criteria by establishing relevance of breeding traits based on the extent of their genotypic variation (ability to discriminate among closely related genotypes) and their relationship with yield under both well-watered and late-season drought stress. Yield, earliness, and physiological traits - relative water content (RWC), and parameters of in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence (SFI, "Structure-Function-Index" and Fv/Fm) - were measured on the two sets of lines during two crop seasons (2001 and 2002). The results show that selection done has maintained or improved production under watered and stressed conditions and increased maturity compared to the recurrent female parent for several lines. Yields obtained in 2001 correlated with yields of 2002 but yields under well-watered were not correlated with yields under drought showing the robustness of varietal yielding across years but not across treatments in groundnut. HIs (Harvest Indices) of these lines were high and stable confirming their high adaptive capacity for reallocation of assimilates to the grains. Yield relationships observed for physiological traits varied with watering conditions and genetic background hence confirming that groundnut has various adaptive adjustments capability for maintenance of yield under stress. Data obtained on fluorescence parameters, in particular SFI, traducing the integrity of photochemistry, showed superior susceptibility to drought and genotypic discriminatory capability. This shows that the integrity of the photosystem II centre is likely a key character in the drought adaptation of groundnut. The approach developed in this study provided SFI as potentially relevant selection criteria that can help screening lines because (i) this trait was chosen on the basis of existing variability detected on appropriate genetic materials (ii) it was correlated with yield performance in the field (iii) and it is easy to measure on large collection of genotypes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection maintained or improved groundnut production under watered and stressed conditions relative to the recurrent female parent for several lines.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Outcome
productione0
Direction
maintained or improvede0
Comparator
recurrent female parente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“selection done has maintained or improved production under watered and stressed conditions and increased maturity compared to the recurrent female parent for several lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1329 · show in text ↑
e1

“groundnut lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–277 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several selected groundnut lines matured earlier than the recurrent female parent.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Outcome
maturitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
recurrent female parente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased maturity compared to the recurrent female parent for several lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1329 · show in text ↑
e1

“groundnut lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–277 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut yields in 2001 correlated with yields in 2002.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Outcome
Yields obtained in 2001e0
Comparator
yields of 2002e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields obtained in 2001 correlated with yields of 2002”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1385 · show in text ↑
e1

“early groundnut lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut yields under well-watered conditions did not correlate with yields under drought.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Outcome
yields under well-waterede0
Direction
not correlatede0
Comparator
yields under droughte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yields under well-watered were not correlated with yields under drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1461 · show in text ↑
e1

“early groundnut lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest indices of the groundnut lines were high and stable.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Outcome
HIs (Harvest Indices)e0
Direction
high and stablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HIs (Harvest Indices) of these lines were high and stable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1616 · show in text ↑
e1

“groundnut lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–277 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut physiological trait relationships with yield varied with watering conditions and genetic background.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Treatment
watering conditionse0
Outcome
Yield relationships observed for physiological traitse0
Direction
variede0
Qualifier
genetic backgrounde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield relationships observed for physiological traits varied with watering conditions and genetic background”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1704–1812 · show in text ↑
e1

“early groundnut lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluorescence parameters, particularly SFI, showed superior drought susceptibility and genotypic discrimination in groundnut.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Outcome
fluorescence parameters, in particular SFIe0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
drought and genotypic discriminatory capabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fluorescence parameters, in particular SFI, traducing the integrity of photochemistry, showed superior susceptibility to drought and genotypic discriminatory capability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1945–2113 · show in text ↑
e1

“early groundnut lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The study proposes SFI as a practical groundnut screening criterion because it varies among lines, correlates with field yield, and is easy to measure.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Outcome
SFI as potentially relevant selection criteriae0
Qualifier
it is easy to measure on large collection of genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SFI as potentially relevant selection criteria that can help screening lines because (i) this trait was chosen on the basis of existing variability detected on appropriate genetic materials (ii) it was correlated with yield performance in the field (iii) and it is easy to measure on large collection of genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2286–2599 · show in text ↑
e1

“early groundnut lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑