Abstract
BRIS (Beach Ridges Interspersed with Swales) soil is a problematic soil in Malaysia. The present study focuses on how to improve BRIS soil as a sandy soil contain poor nutrients with low water holding capacity and organic matter. More than 90% of the composition of BRIS soil is sand and the soil is considered practically worthless for agricultural purposes. Application two types of green manure which is Sesbania grandiflora and Gliricidia maculata leaves in order to solve the problematic of BRIS soil. Twenty-four Arachis hypogaea plants were test growth performance on BRIS soil and conducted under full sunlight. The experiments were laid out in a Completely Randomized Design with four replications. Parameters that measured are plant height, total leaves number, diameter, dry biomass production and Relative Growth Rate (RGR). The result of ANOVA for height Arachis hypogaea where only week 4 and week 8 shows significant value on media which are week 4 (P=0.007) and week 8 (P=0.000). Total number of leaves showed week 8 has significant value which is P=0.024 on media. While, diameter Arachis hypogaea showed week 1 has significant value on media P=0.004. Then, RGR showed significant value on media P=0.002. The different media and type of green manure is main variables, it was shown that there was no significant relationship between media and green manure in the composition of the soil. No significant differences were recorded for green manure as treatment throughout 66 days experimental period. Only media that contained ratios gave effect on the growth performance of Arachis hypogaea.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Media significantly affected plant height of Arachis hypogaea at week 4 and week 8.
- Taxon
- Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- mediae1
- Outcome
- heighte1
- Qualifier
- week 4 (P=0.007) and week 8 (P=0.000)e1
- Setting
- BRIS soilt0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The result of ANOVA for height Arachis hypogaea where only week 4 and week 8 shows significant value on media which are week 4 (P=0.007) and week 8 (P=0.000)”
t0“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) grown on BRIS soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Media significantly affected total leaf number of Arachis hypogaea at week 8 (P=0.024).
- Taxon
- Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- mediae2
- Outcome
- Total number of leavese2
- Qualifier
- week 8 has significant value which is P=0.024e2
- Setting
- BRIS soilt0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“Total number of leaves showed week 8 has significant value which is P=0.024 on media”
t0“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) grown on BRIS soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Media significantly affected stem diameter of Arachis hypogaea at week 1 (P=0.004).
- Taxon
- Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- mediae3
- Outcome
- diametere3
- Qualifier
- week 1 has significant value on media P=0.004e3
- Setting
- BRIS soilt0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“While, diameter Arachis hypogaea showed week 1 has significant value on media P=0.004”
t0“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) grown on BRIS soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Media significantly affected relative growth rate (RGR) of Arachis hypogaea (P=0.002).
- Taxon
- Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- mediae4
- Outcome
- RGRe4
- Qualifier
- P=0.002e4
- Setting
- BRIS soilt0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Then, RGR showed significant value on media P=0.002”
t0“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) grown on BRIS soil”
Claim · model-written summary
No significant relationship was found between media and green manure in the composition of the soil.
- Taxon
- Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- green manuree5
- Outcome
- composition of the soile5
- Direction
- no significant relationshipe5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“there was no significant relationship between media and green manure in the composition of the soil”
t0“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) grown on BRIS soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Green manure as a treatment had no significant effect on growth of Arachis hypogaea over 66 days.
- Taxon
- Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- green manuree6
- Outcome
- growth performancee7
- Direction
- No significant differencese6
- Qualifier
- throughout 66 days experimental periode6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“No significant differences were recorded for green manure as treatment throughout 66 days experimental period”
e7“Only media that contained ratios gave effect on the growth performance of Arachis hypogaea”
t0“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) grown on BRIS soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Only media containing green manure ratios affected growth performance of Arachis hypogaea.
- Taxon
- Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeae7
- Treatment
- media that contained ratiose7
- Outcome
- growth performancee7
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“Only media that contained ratios gave effect on the growth performance of Arachis hypogaea”
t0“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) grown on BRIS soil”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 182 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
200 papers more in this group
See all 204 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.