Paper · 2018 · Scientific Reports

Synthesis of C-coordinated O-carboxymethyl chitosan metal complexes and evaluation of their antifungal activity

Weixiang Liu; Yukun Qin; Song Liu; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
38
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Based on a condensation reaction, a chitosan-derivative-bearing amino pyridine group was prepared and subsequently followed by coordination with cupric ions, zinc ions and nickel ions to synthesize chitosan metal complexes. The calculations using the density functional theory (DFT) show that the copper ions and nickel ions underwent dsp 2 hybridization, the zinc ions underwent sp 3 hybridization, and they all formed a coordination bond with the carbon atom in the p-π conjugate group. The antifungal properties of O-CSPX-M against Phytophthora capsici (P. capsici) , Verticillium alboatrum (V. alboatrum) , Botrytis cinerea (B. cinerea) and Rhizoctonia solani (R. solani) were also assayed. Apparently, chitosan metal complexes showed enhanced antifungal activity against four fungi at the tested concentrations compared to that of chitosan. It was shown that Cu complexes can inhibit the growth of P. capsici 100%, and Ni complexes can inhibit the growth of B. cinerea 77.1% at a concentration of 0.4 mg/mL and 0.2 mg/mL, respectively. The pot experiment also verified the result. In addition, the phytotoxicity experiment showed that O-CSPX-M had no obvious toxicity on wheat leaves. This kind of complexes may represent as an attractive direction for chemical modifications of metal fungicides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan metal complexes had enhanced antifungal activity against four fungi compared with chitosan.

Treatment
chitosan metal complexese0
Outcome
antifungal activity against four fungie0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
chitosane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chitosan metal complexes showed enhanced antifungal activity against four fungi at the tested concentrations compared to that of chitosan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu complexes inhibited P. capsici growth by 100%.

Treatment
Cu complexese0
Interactor
P. capsiciPhytophthora capsicie0pathogent1
Outcome
growth of P. capsicie0
Direction
inhibite0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora capsici
Phytophthora capsici · InteractorElsa Paderes, Landcare Research NZ Ltd. · CC BY 3.0 nz · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cu complexes can inhibit the growth of P. capsici 100%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1197 · show in text ↑
t1

“Phytophthora capsici (P. capsici)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–577 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ni complexes inhibited B. cinerea growth by 77.1%.

Treatment
Ni complexese0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogent1
Outcome
growth of B. cinereae0
Direction
inhibite0
Value
77.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ni complexes can inhibit the growth of B. cinerea 77.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1197 · show in text ↑
t1

“Botrytis cinerea (B. cinerea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O-CSPX-M showed no obvious toxicity on wheat leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
O-CSPX-Me0
Outcome
toxicity on wheat leavese0
Direction
no obvious toxicitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“O-CSPX-M had no obvious toxicity on wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1197 · show in text ↑

chitosan · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.