Abstract
An experiment was conducted during March to July in 2017 (off season) at the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jaffna, Ariviyal Nagar, Kilinochchi to study the effects of different shade levels on growth and yield performances of cauliflower. Different shade levels such as 25 % (open field), 50 % (single net house) and 75 % (double net house) were used as treatments. The experiment was conducted in completely randomized design (CRD) with four replications. Parametric (growth & yield) analysis were done by using SAS 9.1 package. The influence of environmental variables such as temperature, relative humidity and light intensity were also studied.The result revealed that growing of cauliflower in different shade levels showed great influence on plant growth and yield attributes. There were significant variations in number of leaves, plant height,curd weight, curd diameter and curd circumference of cauliflower under different light intensities. Light intensity in the shade net house was lower than in the open field. The highest vegetative growth and yield were observed in cauliflower which was grown in 50 % shade levels and the lowest yield was in 25 % shade level (open field). It can be concluded that cauliflower can be cultivated in 50 % shade levels successfully to produce quality curd during off season of the dry zone of Sri Lanka.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Shade levels produced significant variation in leaf number, plant height and curd size and weight.
- Taxon
- cauliflower
Brassica oleracea var. botrytise0 - Treatment
- different light intensitiese0
- Outcome
- number of leaves, plant height,curd weighte0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Cauliflower”
e0“There were significant variations in number of leaves, plant height,curd weight, curd diameter and curd circumference of cauliflower under different light intensities.”
Claim · model-written summary
Shade levels produced significant variation in curd diameter and circumference.
- Taxon
- cauliflower
Brassica oleracea var. botrytise0 - Treatment
- different light intensitiese0
- Outcome
- curd diameter and curd circumferencee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Cauliflower”
e0“There were significant variations in number of leaves, plant height,curd weight, curd diameter and curd circumference of cauliflower under different light intensities.”
Claim · model-written summary
Light intensity in the net house was lower than in the open field.
- Taxon
- Cauliflower
Brassica oleracea var. botrytist0 - Outcome
- Light intensitye0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- open fielde0
- Setting
- shade net housee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Cauliflower”
e0“Light intensity in the shade net house was lower than in the open field.”
Claim · model-written summary
At 50% shade, cauliflower had the highest vegetative growth.
- Taxon
- cauliflower
Brassica oleracea var. botrytise0 - Treatment
- 50 % shade levelse0
- Outcome
- vegetative growthe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- 25 % shade level (open field)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Cauliflower”
e0“The highest vegetative growth and yield were observed in cauliflower which was grown in 50 % shade levels and the lowest yield was in 25 % shade level (open field).”
Claim · model-written summary
At 50% shade, cauliflower had the highest yield.
- Taxon
- cauliflower
Brassica oleracea var. botrytise0 - Treatment
- 50 % shade levelse0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- 25 % shade level (open field)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Cauliflower”
e0“The highest vegetative growth and yield were observed in cauliflower which was grown in 50 % shade levels and the lowest yield was in 25 % shade level (open field).”
Claim · model-written summary
At 25% shade in the open field, yield was lowest.
- Taxon
- Cauliflower
Brassica oleracea var. botrytist0 - Treatment
- 25 % shade level (open field)e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- loweste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Cauliflower”
e0“the lowest yield was in 25 % shade level (open field).”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend 50% shade for quality curd production in the off season of the Sri Lankan dry zone.
- Taxon
- cauliflower
Brassica oleracea var. botrytise0 - Outcome
- cultivated in 50 % shade levels successfully to produce quality curde0
- Setting
- dry zone of Sri Lankae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Cauliflower”
e0“cauliflower can be cultivated in 50 % shade levels successfully to produce quality curd during off season of the dry zone of Sri Lanka.”
The same questions in other papers
shade · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →shade · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →cultivation system · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.