Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Environment Agriculture and Biotechnology

Effect of Different Shade Levels on Growth and Yield Performances of Cauliflower

P. G. C Yasoda; L. Pradheeban; K. Nishanthan; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during March to July in 2017 (off season) at the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jaffna, Ariviyal Nagar, Kilinochchi to study the effects of different shade levels on growth and yield performances of cauliflower. Different shade levels such as 25 % (open field), 50 % (single net house) and 75 % (double net house) were used as treatments. The experiment was conducted in completely randomized design (CRD) with four replications. Parametric (growth & yield) analysis were done by using SAS 9.1 package. The influence of environmental variables such as temperature, relative humidity and light intensity were also studied.The result revealed that growing of cauliflower in different shade levels showed great influence on plant growth and yield attributes. There were significant variations in number of leaves, plant height,curd weight, curd diameter and curd circumference of cauliflower under different light intensities. Light intensity in the shade net house was lower than in the open field. The highest vegetative growth and yield were observed in cauliflower which was grown in 50 % shade levels and the lowest yield was in 25 % shade level (open field). It can be concluded that cauliflower can be cultivated in 50 % shade levels successfully to produce quality curd during off season of the dry zone of Sri Lanka.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade levels produced significant variation in leaf number, plant height and curd size and weight.

Treatment
different light intensitiese0
Outcome
number of leaves, plant height,curd weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“There were significant variations in number of leaves, plant height,curd weight, curd diameter and curd circumference of cauliflower under different light intensities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade levels produced significant variation in curd diameter and circumference.

Treatment
different light intensitiese0
Outcome
curd diameter and curd circumferencee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“There were significant variations in number of leaves, plant height,curd weight, curd diameter and curd circumference of cauliflower under different light intensities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–958 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light intensity in the net house was lower than in the open field.

Outcome
Light intensitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
open fielde0
Setting
shade net housee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Light intensity in the shade net house was lower than in the open field.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1031 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 50% shade, cauliflower had the highest vegetative growth.

Treatment
50 % shade levelse0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
25 % shade level (open field)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest vegetative growth and yield were observed in cauliflower which was grown in 50 % shade levels and the lowest yield was in 25 % shade level (open field).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 50% shade, cauliflower had the highest yield.

Treatment
50 % shade levelse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
25 % shade level (open field)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest vegetative growth and yield were observed in cauliflower which was grown in 50 % shade levels and the lowest yield was in 25 % shade level (open field).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25% shade in the open field, yield was lowest.

Treatment
25 % shade level (open field)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“the lowest yield was in 25 % shade level (open field).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1196 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 50% shade for quality curd production in the off season of the Sri Lankan dry zone.

Outcome
cultivated in 50 % shade levels successfully to produce quality curde0
Setting
dry zone of Sri Lankae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“cauliflower can be cultivated in 50 % shade levels successfully to produce quality curd during off season of the dry zone of Sri Lanka.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1357 · show in text ↑

shade · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

shade · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 8 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.