Paper · 2018 · Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture

Influence of winter stress and plastic tunnels on yield and quality of spinach, pak choi, radish, and carrot

Santosh Shiwakoti, Valtcho D. Zheljazkov; Vicki Schlegel

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plastic tunnels are the viable options for the successful production of cold-tolerant vegetables during cold months of the milder climate regions. However, growing vegetables in northern climates can be a challenge because of long and severe winters. Therefore, we conducted a plastic tunnels study on carrot, radish, spinach, and pak choi in northern Wyoming, USA to explore the viability and quality of the vegetable production under winter stress. The objective was to quantify the effect of different season extension methods on the produce yield, its total phenol content, and antioxidant activity. The experiment consisted of three tunnel systems: high tunnel (Ht), low tunnel (Lt), and low tunnel within high tunnel (LtHt). We were able to harvest vegetables in the freezing November of Wyoming. Spinach, and pak choi had markedly higher yield in LtHt (6,410 kg ha-1 spinach and 20,644 kg ha-1 pak choi) than Ht (4,574 kg ha-1 for spinach and 12,076 kg ha-1 for pak choi) and Lt (3,253 kg ha-1 spinach and 8,242 kg ha-1 pak choi). The concentrations of nutrients in the vegetables weren’t affected by the tunnel systems. Greater antioxidant activity of pak choi was evident in Ht than in Lt and LtHt. This experiment demonstrated that challenges of severe winter for growing cool-season vegetables can be mitigated largely by opting for LtHt rather than Lt or Ht alone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetables could be harvested during freezing November in Wyoming.

Outcome
harvest vegetablese0
Setting
Wyominge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We were able to harvest vegetables in the freezing November of Wyoming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinach yield was higher in LtHt, 6,410 kg ha-1, than in Ht and Lt.

Treatment
LtHte0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
6,410 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
Hte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spinach, and pak choi had markedly higher yield in LtHt (6,410 kg ha-1 spinach and 20,644 kg ha-1 pak choi) than Ht (4,574 kg ha-1 for spinach and 12,076 kg ha-1 for pak choi) and Lt (3,253 kg ha-1 spinach and 8,242 kg ha-1 pak choi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pak choi yield was higher in LtHt, 20,644 kg ha-1, than in Ht and Lt.

Taxon
pak choie0
Treatment
LtHte0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
20,644 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
Hte0

Verbatim

e0

“Spinach, and pak choi had markedly higher yield in LtHt (6,410 kg ha-1 spinach and 20,644 kg ha-1 pak choi) than Ht (4,574 kg ha-1 for spinach and 12,076 kg ha-1 for pak choi) and Lt (3,253 kg ha-1 spinach and 8,242 kg ha-1 pak choi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tunnel systems did not change vegetable nutrient concentrations.

Treatment
tunnel systemse0
Outcome
concentrations of nutrientse0
Direction
weren’t affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentrations of nutrients in the vegetables weren’t affected by the tunnel systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pak choi antioxidant activity was greater in Ht than Lt and LtHt.

Taxon
pak choie0
Treatment
Hte0
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
Greatere0
Comparator
Lt and LtHte0

Verbatim

e0

“Greater antioxidant activity of pak choi was evident in Ht than in Lt and LtHt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1206 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors favor LtHt to mitigate severe winter production challenges.

Outcome
opting for LtHt rather than Lt or Ht alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“challenges of severe winter for growing cool-season vegetables can be mitigated largely by opting for LtHt rather than Lt or Ht alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1375 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–78 · show in text ↑

protected cultivation · yield · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.