Paper · 2018 · Soil Use and Management

Contributions from carbon and nitrogen in roots to closing the yield gap between conventional and organic cropping systems

E. M. Córdoba; N. Chirinda; F. Li; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the effect of different crop rotation systems on carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in root biomass as well as on soil organic carbon ( SOC ). Soils under spring barley and spring barley/pea mixture were sampled both in organic and conventional crop rotations. The amounts of root biomass and SOC in fine (250–253 μ m), medium (425–250 μ m) and coarse (>425 μ m) soil particulate organic matter ( POM ) were determined. Grain dry matter ( DM ) and the amount of N in harvested grain were also quantified. Organic systems with varying use of manure and catch crops had lower spring barley grain DM yield compared to those in conventional systems, whereas barley/pea showed no differences. The largest benefits were observed for grain N yields and grain DM yields for spring barley, where grain N yield was positively correlated with root N. The inclusion of catch crops in organic rotations resulted in higher root N and SOC (g C/m 2 ) in fine POM in soils under barley/pea. Our results suggest that manure application and inclusion of catch crops improve crop N supply and reduce the yield gap between conventional and organic rotations. The observed positive correlation between root N and grain N imply that management practices aimed at increasing grain N could also increase root N and thus enhance N supply for subsequent crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic systems with varying manure use and catch crops had lower spring barley grain dry matter yield than conventional systems.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
Organic systems with varying use of manure and catch cropse0
Outcome
grain DM yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
conventional systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic systems with varying use of manure and catch crops had lower spring barley grain DM yield compared to those in conventional systems, whereas barley/pea showed no differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For barley/pea, organic systems did not differ from conventional systems in grain dry matter yield.

Treatment
Organic systemse0
Outcome
grain DM yielde0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
conventional systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic systems with varying use of manure and catch crops had lower spring barley grain DM yield compared to those in conventional systems, whereas barley/pea showed no differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–712 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The largest benefits were observed for grain N yield and grain dry matter yield of spring barley.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Outcome
grain N yields and grain DM yieldse0
Qualifier
largest benefitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The largest benefits were observed for grain N yields and grain DM yields for spring barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–805 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In spring barley, grain N yield was positively correlated with root N.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Compound
root Ne0
Outcome
grain N yielde0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain N yields and grain DM yields for spring barley, where grain N yield was positively correlated with root N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–864 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Including catch crops in organic rotations resulted in higher root N and soil organic carbon in fine particulate organic matter under barley/pea.

Treatment
inclusion of catch crops in organic rotationse0
Outcome
root N and SOC (g C/m 2 ) in fine POMe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inclusion of catch crops in organic rotations resulted in higher root N and SOC (g C/m 2 ) in fine POM in soils under barley/pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure application and inclusion of catch crops improve crop N supply, according to the authors.

Taxon
crope0
Treatment
manure application and inclusion of catch cropse0
Outcome
crop N supplye0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“manure application and inclusion of catch crops improve crop N supply and reduce the yield gap between conventional and organic rotations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure application and inclusion of catch crops reduce the yield gap between conventional and organic rotations, according to the authors.

Taxon
crope0
Treatment
manure application and inclusion of catch cropse0
Outcome
yield gape0
Direction
reducee0
Comparator
conventional and organic rotationse0

Verbatim

e0

“manure application and inclusion of catch crops improve crop N supply and reduce the yield gap between conventional and organic rotations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1162 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Management practices aimed at increasing grain N could also increase root N and thus enhance N supply for subsequent crops.

Taxon
cropse0
Outcome
N supply for subsequent cropse0

Verbatim

e0

“management practices aimed at increasing grain N could also increase root N and thus enhance N supply for subsequent crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1358 · show in text ↑

cover crop · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

17 papers: 9 positive, 8 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

cover crop · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

165 papers: 138 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 138 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

161 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

cover crop · soil: chemistry · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.