Paper · 2018 · Journal of Tropical Agriculture

Water - weed interactions in aerobic rice

Akhil T. Thomas; Deepa Thomas; Mini Abraham; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field study was undertaken at Agronomic Research Station, Chalakudy, Kerala for developing suitable water and weed management strategies for aerobic rice. The trial was laid out with three levels of irrigation in the main plot [irrigation at 10, 20 and 30 mm CPE (cumulative pan evaporation)] and five weed management treatments in the subplot (pre emergent herbicide oxadiargyl followed by hand weeding, 2,4- D sodium salt or bispyribac sodium at 20 days after sowing (DAS), hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS and unweeded control). Irrigation at 10 mm CPE increased crop growth, but reduced weed growth. Less irrigation (30 mm CPE) favoured the growth and density of grasses and broad leaf weeds and produced the highest weed dry matter. Sedge population was more in frequently irrigated plot (10 mm CPE). Moisture stress in 30 mm CPE resulted in 44 per cent yield loss. Weed competition caused 64 per cent yield reduction. Both water and weeds together accounted for 85 per cent yield reduction. Irrigation at 10 mm CPE recorded the highest grain yield and weed control efficiency, but lowest water productivity. Among weed management practices, hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS recorded the highest grain yield, weed control efficiency and water productivity. However, application of oxadiargyl followed by bispyribac sodium resulted in better water productivity and recorded highest B:C ratio.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 10 mm CPE increased rice growth.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
Irrigation at 10 mm CPEe0
Outcome
crop growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“Irrigation at 10 mm CPE increased crop growth, but reduced weed growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 10 mm CPE reduced weed growth.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
Irrigation at 10 mm CPEe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“Irrigation at 10 mm CPE increased crop growth, but reduced weed growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Less irrigation at 30 mm CPE favoured grass and broad leaf weed growth and density.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
Less irrigation (30 mm CPE)e0
Interactor
grasses and broad leaf weedse0weed
Outcome
growth and density of grasses and broad leaf weedse0
Direction
favourede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“Less irrigation (30 mm CPE) favoured the growth and density of grasses and broad leaf weeds and produced the highest weed dry matter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Less irrigation at 30 mm CPE produced the highest weed dry matter.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
Less irrigation (30 mm CPE)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed dry mattere0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“Less irrigation (30 mm CPE) favoured the growth and density of grasses and broad leaf weeds and produced the highest weed dry matter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–736 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sedge population was greater under frequent irrigation at 10 mm CPE.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
frequently irrigated plot (10 mm CPE)e0
Interactor
Sedgee0weed
Outcome
Sedge populatione0
Direction
moree0

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sedge population was more in frequently irrigated plot (10 mm CPE).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture stress at 30 mm CPE caused 44 per cent yield loss.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
Moisture stress in 30 mm CPEe0
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
losse0
Value
44 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“Moisture stress in 30 mm CPE resulted in 44 per cent yield loss.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–869 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed competition caused a 64 per cent rice yield reduction.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
Weed competitione0
Interactor
Weede0weed
Outcome
yield reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
64 per cente0

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“Weed competition caused 64 per cent yield reduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–922 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water and weeds together accounted for 85 per cent rice yield reduction.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
water and weedse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
yield reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
85 per cente0

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“Both water and weeds together accounted for 85 per cent yield reduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 10 mm CPE gave the highest grain yield and weed control efficiency.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
Irrigation at 10 mm CPEe0
Outcome
grain yield and weed control efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“Irrigation at 10 mm CPE recorded the highest grain yield and weed control efficiency, but lowest water productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 10 mm CPE gave the lowest water productivity.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
Irrigation at 10 mm CPEe0
Outcome
water productivitye0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“Irrigation at 10 mm CPE recorded the highest grain yield and weed control efficiency, but lowest water productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS gave the highest grain yield, weed control efficiency and water productivity.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
hand weeding at 20 and 40 DASe0
Outcome
grain yield, weed control efficiency and water productivitye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS recorded the highest grain yield, weed control efficiency and water productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1257 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxadiargyl followed by bispyribac sodium gave better water productivity.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
application of oxadiargyl followed by bispyribac sodiume0
Outcome
water productivitye0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of oxadiargyl followed by bispyribac sodium resulted in better water productivity and recorded highest B:C ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1392 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxadiargyl followed by bispyribac sodium gave the highest B:C ratio.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
application of oxadiargyl followed by bispyribac sodiume0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of oxadiargyl followed by bispyribac sodium resulted in better water productivity and recorded highest B:C ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1392 · show in text ↑

bispyribac-sodium · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

170 papers: 161 positive, 9 negative or no effect

160 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

166 papers more in this group

See all 170 papers →

bispyribac-sodium · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

irrigation · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 25 positive, 7 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

drought · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

325 papers: 76 positive, 249 negative or no effect

248 papers in the same direction as this paper · 76 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

321 papers more in this group

See all 325 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 350 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.