Paper · 2017 · Journal of Horticultural Science

Comprehensive Microbial Study on Biocide Application as Vase Solution Preservatives for Cut ‘Cherry Brandy’ Rose Flower

M.M. Jowkar; N. Hassanzadeh; Mohsen Kafi; et al.

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Disturbance in water relations is the major causes of vase life reduction and senescence in cut flowers This problem is mainly due to microorganism proliferation in the vase solution which leads to vascular occlusion and reduction in solution uptake by cut flowers. Therefore a comprehensive study was conducted to evaluate the biocidal effect of nano silver particles (NSP) and compare it with some previously applied biocides. Roses (cv. Cherry Brandy) were treated in a completely randomized design with: colloid of NSP, citric acid, aluminum sulfate, hydroxyquinoline citrate (HQC), calcium hypochlorite, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), tap water, or sterilized distilled water as vase water or solution. Longest vase life was observed in flowers treated with nano silver particles, aluminum sulphate and citric acid, respectively. Nano silver particles, HQC and calcium hypochlorite were the most effective treatments in controlling microbial population followed by aluminum sulfate as the second effective treatment. Nano silver particles, HQC and calcium hypochlorite completely inhibited the microbial growth during the first six days of experiment. Moreover, aluminum sulfate retarded microbial growth, proliferation and growth rate more efficiently than others. Each treatment allowed proliferation of a specific microbe. In general, two yeasts, six fungi, and 26 bacterial colonies were isolated from different vase solutions. Among the isolated fungi, one isolate was Trichoderma harzianum and the five other were different strains of Fusarium solani. Identified bacterial isolates were Bacillus sp., Coccus spp., Streptomyces sp., Pectobacterium sp., Burkholderia sp., and Pseudomonas sp. Bacillus was the most wide spread microorganism in most treatments. Identified Bacillus sp. isolates were B. polymexa, B. subtilis, B. megaterium and B. circulans. Since nano silver significantly improved vase life and effectively controlled microbial proliferation in vase solution, our results suggest that nano silver application could be considered as a biocidal preservative solution for rose cut flowers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano silver particles gave the longest vase life of cut roses, ahead of aluminum sulphate and citric acid.

Taxon
Rosese1
Material
cv. Cherry Brandye1
Treatment
nano silver particlese2
Outcome
Longest vase lifee2
Direction
Longeste2
Comparator
aluminum sulphate and citric acide2

Verbatim

e1

“Roses (cv. Cherry Brandy) were treated in a completely randomized design with: colloid of NSP, citric acid, aluminum sulfate, hydroxyquinoline citrate (HQC), calcium hypochlorite, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), tap water, or sterilized distilled water as vase water or solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–704 · show in text ↑
e2

“Longest vase life was observed in flowers treated with nano silver particles, aluminum sulphate and citric acid, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano silver particles, HQC and calcium hypochlorite were the most effective treatments in controlling microbial population of cut roses.

Taxon
Rosese1
Treatment
Nano silver particles, HQC and calcium hypochloritee2
Outcome
controlling microbial populatione2
Direction
most effectivee2
Comparator
aluminum sulfatee2

Verbatim

e1

“Roses (cv. Cherry Brandy) were treated in a completely randomized design with: colloid of NSP, citric acid, aluminum sulfate, hydroxyquinoline citrate (HQC), calcium hypochlorite, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), tap water, or sterilized distilled water as vase water or solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–704 · show in text ↑
e2

“Nano silver particles, HQC and calcium hypochlorite were the most effective treatments in controlling microbial population followed by aluminum sulfate as the second effective treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–1018 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminum sulfate was the second most effective treatment in controlling microbial population of cut roses.

Taxon
Rosese1
Treatment
aluminum sulfatee2
Outcome
controlling microbial populatione2
Direction
second effectivee2
Comparator
Nano silver particles, HQC and calcium hypochloritee2

Verbatim

e1

“Roses (cv. Cherry Brandy) were treated in a completely randomized design with: colloid of NSP, citric acid, aluminum sulfate, hydroxyquinoline citrate (HQC), calcium hypochlorite, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), tap water, or sterilized distilled water as vase water or solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–704 · show in text ↑
e2

“Nano silver particles, HQC and calcium hypochlorite were the most effective treatments in controlling microbial population followed by aluminum sulfate as the second effective treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–1018 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano silver particles, HQC and calcium hypochlorite completely inhibited microbial growth in the vase solution during the first six days.

Taxon
Rosese1
Treatment
Nano silver particles, HQC and calcium hypochloritee3
Outcome
microbial growthe3
Direction
completely inhibitede3
Qualifier
during the first six days of experimente3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Roses (cv. Cherry Brandy) were treated in a completely randomized design with: colloid of NSP, citric acid, aluminum sulfate, hydroxyquinoline citrate (HQC), calcium hypochlorite, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), tap water, or sterilized distilled water as vase water or solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–704 · show in text ↑
e3

“Nano silver particles, HQC and calcium hypochlorite completely inhibited the microbial growth during the first six days of experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminum sulfate retarded microbial growth, proliferation and growth rate more efficiently than the other treatments.

Taxon
Rosese1
Treatment
aluminum sulfatee4
Outcome
microbial growth, proliferation and growth ratee4
Direction
retardede4
Qualifier
more efficientlye4
Comparator
otherse4

Verbatim

e1

“Roses (cv. Cherry Brandy) were treated in a completely randomized design with: colloid of NSP, citric acid, aluminum sulfate, hydroxyquinoline citrate (HQC), calcium hypochlorite, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), tap water, or sterilized distilled water as vase water or solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–704 · show in text ↑
e4

“Moreover, aluminum sulfate retarded microbial growth, proliferation and growth rate more efficiently than others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1267 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two yeasts, six fungi and 26 bacterial colonies were isolated from the different vase solutions.

Taxon
Rosese1
Outcome
colonies were isolated from different vase solutionse5
Value
two yeasts, six fungi, and 26 bacterial coloniese5

Verbatim

e1

“Roses (cv. Cherry Brandy) were treated in a completely randomized design with: colloid of NSP, citric acid, aluminum sulfate, hydroxyquinoline citrate (HQC), calcium hypochlorite, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), tap water, or sterilized distilled water as vase water or solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–704 · show in text ↑
e5

“In general, two yeasts, six fungi, and 26 bacterial colonies were isolated from different vase solutions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1433 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One isolated fungus was Trichoderma harzianum and the other five were Fusarium solani strains.

Taxon
Rosese1
Interactor
Trichoderma harzianumTrichoderma harzianume6other
Second interactor
Fusarium solaniFusarium solanie6other
Outcome
isolated fungie6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · Second interactorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Roses (cv. Cherry Brandy) were treated in a completely randomized design with: colloid of NSP, citric acid, aluminum sulfate, hydroxyquinoline citrate (HQC), calcium hypochlorite, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), tap water, or sterilized distilled water as vase water or solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–704 · show in text ↑
e6

“Among the isolated fungi, one isolate was Trichoderma harzianum and the five other were different strains of Fusarium solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1559 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus was the most widespread microorganism in most vase-solution treatments.

Taxon
Rosese1
Interactor
Bacilluse7other
Outcome
most wide spread microorganisme7
Qualifier
in most treatmentse7

Verbatim

e1

“Roses (cv. Cherry Brandy) were treated in a completely randomized design with: colloid of NSP, citric acid, aluminum sulfate, hydroxyquinoline citrate (HQC), calcium hypochlorite, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), tap water, or sterilized distilled water as vase water or solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–704 · show in text ↑
e7

“Bacillus was the most wide spread microorganism in most treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1699–1765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano silver significantly improved vase life of cut roses.

Taxon
Rosese1
Treatment
nano silvere2
Outcome
vase lifee2
Direction
significantly improvede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Roses (cv. Cherry Brandy) were treated in a completely randomized design with: colloid of NSP, citric acid, aluminum sulfate, hydroxyquinoline citrate (HQC), calcium hypochlorite, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), tap water, or sterilized distilled water as vase water or solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–704 · show in text ↑
e2

“Since nano silver significantly improved vase life and effectively controlled microbial proliferation in vase solution, our results suggest that nano silver application could be considered as a biocidal preservative solution for rose cut flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1863–2108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano silver effectively controlled microbial proliferation in the vase solution of cut roses.

Taxon
Rosese1
Treatment
nano silvere2
Outcome
microbial proliferation in vase solutione2
Direction
effectively controllede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Roses (cv. Cherry Brandy) were treated in a completely randomized design with: colloid of NSP, citric acid, aluminum sulfate, hydroxyquinoline citrate (HQC), calcium hypochlorite, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), tap water, or sterilized distilled water as vase water or solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–704 · show in text ↑
e2

“Since nano silver significantly improved vase life and effectively controlled microbial proliferation in vase solution, our results suggest that nano silver application could be considered as a biocidal preservative solution for rose cut flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1863–2108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each treatment allowed proliferation of a specific microbe.

Taxon
Rosese1
Treatment
Each treatmente3
Outcome
proliferation of a specific microbee3

Verbatim

e1

“Roses (cv. Cherry Brandy) were treated in a completely randomized design with: colloid of NSP, citric acid, aluminum sulfate, hydroxyquinoline citrate (HQC), calcium hypochlorite, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), tap water, or sterilized distilled water as vase water or solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–704 · show in text ↑
e3

“Each treatment allowed proliferation of a specific microbe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1327 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Identified bacterial isolates from the vase solutions included Bacillus, Coccus, Streptomyces, Pectobacterium, Burkholderia and Pseudomonas species.

Taxon
Rosese1
Outcome
Identified bacterial isolatese4
Qualifier
Bacillus sp., Coccus spp., Streptomyces sp., Pectobacterium sp., Burkholderia sp., and Pseudomonas sp.e4

Verbatim

e1

“Roses (cv. Cherry Brandy) were treated in a completely randomized design with: colloid of NSP, citric acid, aluminum sulfate, hydroxyquinoline citrate (HQC), calcium hypochlorite, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), tap water, or sterilized distilled water as vase water or solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–704 · show in text ↑
e4

“Identified bacterial isolates were Bacillus sp., Coccus spp., Streptomyces sp., Pectobacterium sp., Burkholderia sp., and Pseudomonas sp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1698 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Identified Bacillus sp. isolates were B. polymexa, B. subtilis, B. megaterium and B. circulans.

Taxon
Rosese1
Outcome
Identified Bacillus sp. isolatese5
Qualifier
B. polymexa, B. subtilis, B. megaterium and B. circulanse5

Verbatim

e1

“Roses (cv. Cherry Brandy) were treated in a completely randomized design with: colloid of NSP, citric acid, aluminum sulfate, hydroxyquinoline citrate (HQC), calcium hypochlorite, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), tap water, or sterilized distilled water as vase water or solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–704 · show in text ↑
e5

“Identified Bacillus sp. isolates were B. polymexa, B. subtilis, B. megaterium and B. circulans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1767–1861 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest nano silver could be considered a biocidal preservative solution for rose cut flowers.

Taxon
rose cut flowerse2
Treatment
nano silver applicatione2
Outcome
biocidal preservative solutione2

Verbatim

e2

“Since nano silver significantly improved vase life and effectively controlled microbial proliferation in vase solution, our results suggest that nano silver application could be considered as a biocidal preservative solution for rose cut flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1863–2108 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

aluminium sulfate (anhydrous) · growth · RosaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

silver atom · quality: postharvest · RosaResults agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · RosaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · soil: biology · RosaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: postharvest · RosaResults agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.