Paper · 2018 · Annals of Applied Biology

Nutrient deficiencies do not contribute to yield loss after waterlogging events in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum)

A.‐C. Wollmer; B. Pitann; K.‐H. Mühling

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Frequent waterlogging increases the risk of possible harvest losses in winter wheat. The aim of this study was to analyse which developmental stage of wheat was impaired by waterlogging and whether yield losses can be explained by nutrient deficiences. A large‐scale container experiment was designed to evaluate growth, yield and nutrient status of two wheat cultivars after 14 days of waterlogging at two different developmental stages: DC 31 (first node visible) and DC 51 (beginning of ear emergence). Early waterlogging treatment impaired vegetative growth stages of winter wheat and nutrient uptake, leading to transient nutrient deficiencies, but yield was not significantly reduced. Late waterlogging at the beginning of ear emergence mainly affected generative growth stages and caused yield reductions ranging up to 61%. The main reason for yield loss was the significantly decreased thousand kernel weight in combination with a decreased number of grains per spike. Yield depressions in winter wheat depend on the timing of waterlogging. Early waterlogging transiently reduces vegetative growth through nutrient deficiencies, whereas late waterlogging results in an impaired grain development and associated therewith, yield losses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early waterlogging impaired vegetative growth.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Early waterlogging treatmente0
Outcome
vegetative growth stagese0
Direction
impairede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early waterlogging treatment impaired vegetative growth stages of winter wheat and nutrient uptake, leading to transient nutrient deficiencies, but yield was not significantly reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–699 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early waterlogging impaired nutrient uptake and caused transient deficiency.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Early waterlogging treatmente0
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
impairede0
Qualifier
transient nutrient deficienciese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early waterlogging treatment impaired vegetative growth stages of winter wheat and nutrient uptake, leading to transient nutrient deficiencies, but yield was not significantly reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–699 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early waterlogging did not significantly reduce yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Early waterlogging treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
not significantly reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early waterlogging treatment impaired vegetative growth stages of winter wheat and nutrient uptake, leading to transient nutrient deficiencies, but yield was not significantly reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–699 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late waterlogging impaired generative growth.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Late waterlogginge0
Outcome
generative growth stagese0
Direction
affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Late waterlogging at the beginning of ear emergence mainly affected generative growth stages and caused yield reductions ranging up to 61%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late waterlogging reduced yield by up to 61%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Late waterlogginge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
61%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Late waterlogging at the beginning of ear emergence mainly affected generative growth stages and caused yield reductions ranging up to 61%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower thousand kernel weight contributed to the yield loss.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
kernele0
Outcome
thousand kernel weighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The main reason for yield loss was the significantly decreased thousand kernel weight in combination with a decreased number of grains per spike.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fewer grains per spike contributed to the yield loss.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
spikee0
Outcome
number of grains per spikee0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The main reason for yield loss was the significantly decreased thousand kernel weight in combination with a decreased number of grains per spike.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑

flooding · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 3 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

flooding · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 17 positive, 64 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

flooding · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 17 positive, 85 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.