Paper · 2018 · Bangladesh Agronomy Journal

Performance of System of Rice Intensification with Conventional Method of Rice Cultivation

AP Mondol; PK Biswas; MS Islam

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
12
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University research field of Bangladesh during December 2012 to May 2013. This experiment was tested for two planting method consisting CM planting method (P1) and System of Rice Intensification (SRI) planting method (P2) against five rice (Oryza sativa) varieties named BR 16 (V1), BRRI dhan29 (V2), BRRI dhan50 (V3), BRRI hybrid dhan2 (V4) and Heera 4 (V5). The experiment was laid out in split-plot design with three replications. All yield parameters showed the highest for SRI with higher effective tillers hill-1 (41.13), longer panicle (28.15 cm), higher total grains panicle-1 (216.89), number of filled grains panicle-1 (166.82) as a result 10.17and 12.5% higher grain yield and straw yield, respectively were observed in SRI than the conventional method.Bangladesh Agron. J. 2017, 20(2): 75-80

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI produced more effective tillers per hill, reaching 41.13.

Treatment
SRIe2
Outcome
effective tillers hill-1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
41.13e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher effective tillers hill-1 (41.13)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–589 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–317 · show in text ↑
e2

“All yield parameters showed the highest for SRI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI produced longer panicles, reaching 28.15 cm.

Outcome
paniclee0
Direction
longere0
Value
28.15 cme0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“longer panicle (28.15 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–616 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI produced more grains per panicle, reaching 216.89.

Outcome
total grains panicle-1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
216.89e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher total grains panicle-1 (216.89)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–656 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–317 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI produced 166.82 filled grains per panicle.

Outcome
number of filled grains panicle-1e0
Value
166.82e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of filled grains panicle-1 (166.82)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–700 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI increased grain yield by 10.17% relative to the conventional method.

Treatment
SRIe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
10.17e0
Comparator
conventional methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10.17and 12.5% higher grain yield and straw yield, respectively were observed in SRI than the conventional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–826 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI increased straw yield by 12.5% relative to the conventional method.

Treatment
SRIe0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
12.5%e0
Comparator
conventional methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10.17and 12.5% higher grain yield and straw yield, respectively were observed in SRI than the conventional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–826 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–317 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.