Paper · 2023 · Big Data In Agriculture

EFFECT OF SRI AND AWD TECHNOLOGY IN COMPARISON TO TRADITIONAL METHODS ON YIELD CONTRIBUTING CHARACTERS OF RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)

Abdullah Al Mamun; Md. Ferdous Hossain Khan; Md. Mojaherul Haque

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The leading objective of this anticipated research is to observe the effect of System of Rice Intensification (SRI) and Alternate Wetting & Drying (AWD) on yield contributing characters of rice. The project was conducted during two Rabi seasons viz. Rabi/2017-18 and Rabi/2018-19 in 9 sites under 5 Upazilla. Rice varieties namely BRRI dhan 28 and BRRI dhan 29 were used where 148 beneficiaries were involved. Modern technology SRI (System of Rice Intensification) with Traditional system were implemented for cultivation of BRRI dhan 28 and BRRI dhan 29 in Rabi/2017-18. SRI technology yielded 6.57 cm higher plant height, 12.47 more tiller and 12.90 more effective tillers and also enhanced panicle length (4.03 cm), no. of grain per panicle (20.07), 1000 grains weight (2.80 gm) and 2.60 monds higher yield than that of traditional method. During Rabi/2018-19, technology AWD (Alternate Wetting and Drying) was used with traditional method. AWD yielded 4.73 cm higher plant height, 9.89 more tiller and 9.27 more effective tillers that were significantly higher than that of traditional method. AWD technology has increased panicle length (3.24 cm), no. of grain per panicle (24.69), 1000 grains weight (1.31 gm) and enhanced 2.21 monds higher yield than that of traditional method. SRI technology yielded 11.52% higher yield in Rabi/2017-18 and AWD technology enhanced 12.20% higher yield during Rabi/2018-19 over use of traditional technology. Modern technologies (SRI and AWD) reduced 15.36% water over use of traditional technology for rice cultivation in both seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI technology increased rice plant height by 6.57 cm compared with the traditional method in Rabi/2017-18.

Treatment
SRI technologye1
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
highere1
Value
6.57 cme1
Comparator
traditional methode1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield contributing characters of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“SRI technology yielded 6.57 cm higher plant height, 12.47 more tiller and 12.90 more effective tillers and also enhanced panicle length (4.03 cm), no. of grain per panicle (20.07), 1000 grains weight (2.80 gm) and 2.60 monds higher yield than that of traditional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI technology increased tiller number by 12.47 compared with the traditional method.

Treatment
SRI technologye1
Outcome
tillere1
Direction
moree1
Value
12.47e1
Comparator
traditional methode1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield contributing characters of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“SRI technology yielded 6.57 cm higher plant height, 12.47 more tiller and 12.90 more effective tillers and also enhanced panicle length (4.03 cm), no. of grain per panicle (20.07), 1000 grains weight (2.80 gm) and 2.60 monds higher yield than that of traditional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI technology increased effective tiller number by 12.90 compared with the traditional method.

Treatment
SRI technologye1
Outcome
effective tillerse1
Direction
moree1
Value
12.90e1
Comparator
traditional methode1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield contributing characters of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“SRI technology yielded 6.57 cm higher plant height, 12.47 more tiller and 12.90 more effective tillers and also enhanced panicle length (4.03 cm), no. of grain per panicle (20.07), 1000 grains weight (2.80 gm) and 2.60 monds higher yield than that of traditional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI technology enhanced panicle length by 4.03 cm compared with the traditional method.

Treatment
SRI technologye1
Outcome
panicle lengthe1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
4.03 cme1
Comparator
traditional methode1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield contributing characters of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“SRI technology yielded 6.57 cm higher plant height, 12.47 more tiller and 12.90 more effective tillers and also enhanced panicle length (4.03 cm), no. of grain per panicle (20.07), 1000 grains weight (2.80 gm) and 2.60 monds higher yield than that of traditional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI technology enhanced grain number per panicle by 20.07 compared with the traditional method.

Treatment
SRI technologye1
Outcome
no. of grain per paniclee1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
20.07e1
Comparator
traditional methode1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield contributing characters of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“SRI technology yielded 6.57 cm higher plant height, 12.47 more tiller and 12.90 more effective tillers and also enhanced panicle length (4.03 cm), no. of grain per panicle (20.07), 1000 grains weight (2.80 gm) and 2.60 monds higher yield than that of traditional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI technology enhanced 1000-grain weight by 2.80 gm compared with the traditional method.

Treatment
SRI technologye1
Outcome
1000 grains weighte1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
2.80 gme1
Comparator
traditional methode1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield contributing characters of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“SRI technology yielded 6.57 cm higher plant height, 12.47 more tiller and 12.90 more effective tillers and also enhanced panicle length (4.03 cm), no. of grain per panicle (20.07), 1000 grains weight (2.80 gm) and 2.60 monds higher yield than that of traditional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI technology gave 2.60 monds higher rice yield than the traditional method.

Treatment
SRI technologye1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
2.60 mondse1
Comparator
traditional methode1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield contributing characters of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“SRI technology yielded 6.57 cm higher plant height, 12.47 more tiller and 12.90 more effective tillers and also enhanced panicle length (4.03 cm), no. of grain per panicle (20.07), 1000 grains weight (2.80 gm) and 2.60 monds higher yield than that of traditional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI technology gave 11.52% higher rice yield in Rabi/2017-18 than the traditional technology.

Treatment
SRI technologye4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
highere4
Value
11.52%e4
Comparator
traditional technologye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield contributing characters of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–193 · show in text ↑
e4

“SRI technology yielded 11.52% higher yield in Rabi/2017-18 and AWD technology enhanced 12.20% higher yield during Rabi/2018-19 over use of traditional technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD increased rice plant height by 4.73 cm compared with the traditional method in Rabi/2018-19, significantly.

Treatment
AWDe2
Outcome
plant heighte2
Direction
highere2
Value
4.73 cme2
Comparator
traditional methode2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield contributing characters of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–193 · show in text ↑
e2

“AWD yielded 4.73 cm higher plant height, 9.89 more tiller and 9.27 more effective tillers that were significantly higher than that of traditional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1096 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD increased tiller number by 9.89 compared with the traditional method, significantly.

Treatment
AWDe2
Outcome
tillere2
Direction
moree2
Value
9.89e2
Comparator
traditional methode2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield contributing characters of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–193 · show in text ↑
e2

“AWD yielded 4.73 cm higher plant height, 9.89 more tiller and 9.27 more effective tillers that were significantly higher than that of traditional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1096 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD increased effective tiller number by 9.27 compared with the traditional method, significantly.

Treatment
AWDe2
Outcome
effective tillerse2
Direction
moree2
Value
9.27e2
Comparator
traditional methode2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield contributing characters of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–193 · show in text ↑
e2

“AWD yielded 4.73 cm higher plant height, 9.89 more tiller and 9.27 more effective tillers that were significantly higher than that of traditional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1096 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD increased panicle length by 3.24 cm compared with the traditional method.

Treatment
AWD technologye3
Outcome
panicle lengthe3
Direction
increasede3
Value
3.24 cme3
Comparator
traditional methode3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield contributing characters of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–193 · show in text ↑
e3

“AWD technology has increased panicle length (3.24 cm), no. of grain per panicle (24.69), 1000 grains weight (1.31 gm) and enhanced 2.21 monds higher yield than that of traditional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD increased grain number per panicle by 24.69 compared with the traditional method.

Treatment
AWD technologye3
Outcome
no. of grain per paniclee3
Direction
increasede3
Value
24.69e3
Comparator
traditional methode3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield contributing characters of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–193 · show in text ↑
e3

“AWD technology has increased panicle length (3.24 cm), no. of grain per panicle (24.69), 1000 grains weight (1.31 gm) and enhanced 2.21 monds higher yield than that of traditional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD increased 1000-grain weight by 1.31 gm compared with the traditional method.

Treatment
AWD technologye3
Outcome
1000 grains weighte3
Direction
increasede3
Value
1.31 gme3
Comparator
traditional methode3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield contributing characters of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–193 · show in text ↑
e3

“AWD technology has increased panicle length (3.24 cm), no. of grain per panicle (24.69), 1000 grains weight (1.31 gm) and enhanced 2.21 monds higher yield than that of traditional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD gave 2.21 monds higher rice yield than the traditional method.

Treatment
AWD technologye3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
highere3
Value
2.21 mondse3
Comparator
traditional methode3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield contributing characters of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–193 · show in text ↑
e3

“AWD technology has increased panicle length (3.24 cm), no. of grain per panicle (24.69), 1000 grains weight (1.31 gm) and enhanced 2.21 monds higher yield than that of traditional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD technology gave 12.20% higher rice yield in Rabi/2018-19 than the traditional technology.

Treatment
AWD technologye4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
enhancede4
Value
12.20%e4
Comparator
traditional technologye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield contributing characters of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–193 · show in text ↑
e4

“SRI technology yielded 11.52% higher yield in Rabi/2017-18 and AWD technology enhanced 12.20% higher yield during Rabi/2018-19 over use of traditional technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modern technologies (SRI and AWD) reduced water use by 15.36% over the traditional technology for rice cultivation in both seasons.

Treatment
Modern technologies (SRI and AWD)e5
Outcome
watere5
Direction
reducede5
Value
15.36%e5
Comparator
traditional technologye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield contributing characters of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–193 · show in text ↑
e5

“Modern technologies (SRI and AWD) reduced 15.36% water over use of traditional technology for rice cultivation in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1575 · show in text ↑

processing · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

88 papers: 56 positive, 32 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

processing · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 88 positive, 26 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.