Paper · 2022 · Genetika

Performance of basmati rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes under different crop establishment methods

Hari Kesh; Khushi Ram

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The study was conducted to evaluate the performance of thirty-six Basmati rice genotypes for yield and its related traits under direct-seeded rice (DSR), system of rice intensification (SRI), chemical-free cultivation (CFC), and conventional transplanted rice (TPR).The genotypes were evaluated for two years at two locations in randomized block design with three replications. Genotype Pusa Basmati 1121 scored highest ~22% yield increase in system of rice intensification method over transplanted rice followed by Pusa Basmati 1 (~20%) genotypes HKR 11-447 (~18 %). Genotype Pusa Basmati 1, Pusa Basmati 1637-2-8-20-5 and Pusa Basmati1734-8-3-85 produced 8-16 % higher yield in chemical-free cultivation in comparison to TPR. Genotypes HKR 98-476, CSR 30, PAU 6297-1 yielded equally in DSR as well as in TPR. All the genotypes under study showed earlier flowering and maturity in DSR followed by SRI and TPR=CFC. Pusa Basmati 1509recordedthe earliest flowering across the environments. Most of the genotypes showed an increase in panicle weight, number of tillers per plant, number of spikelets per panicle, percent filled spikelets, Biological yield, and grain yield under SRI over other methods of rice crop establishment. Among different methods, SRI was found best than TPR, CFC, and DSR (wet).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa Basmati 1121 yield increased about 22% under SRI versus transplanted rice.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Material
Pusa Basmati 1121e0
Treatment
system of rice intensification methode0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
~22%e0
Comparator
transplanted ricee0

Verbatim

t0

“basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pusa Basmati 1121 scored highest ~22% yield increase in system of rice intensification method over transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa Basmati 1 yielded about 20% more under SRI versus transplanted rice.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Material
Pusa Basmati 1e0
Treatment
system of rice intensification methodt1
Outcome
yieldt1
Direction
increaset1
Value
~20%e0
Comparator
transplanted ricet1

Verbatim

t0

“basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pusa Basmati 1 (~20%) genotypes HKR 11-447 (~18 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–566 · show in text ↑
t1

“yield increase in system of rice intensification method over transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HKR 11-447 yielded about 18% more under SRI versus transplanted rice.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Material
HKR 11-447e0
Treatment
system of rice intensification methodt1
Outcome
yieldt1
Direction
increaset1
Value
~18 %e0
Comparator
transplanted ricet1

Verbatim

t0

“basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
t1

“yield increase in system of rice intensification method over transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–503 · show in text ↑
e0

“HKR 11-447 (~18 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three named genotypes yielded 8-16% more under chemical-free cultivation than TPR.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Material
Pusa Basmati 1, Pusa Basmati 1637-2-8-20-5 and Pusa Basmati1734-8-3-85e0
Treatment
chemical-free cultivatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
8-16 %e0
Comparator
TPRe0

Verbatim

t0

“basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pusa Basmati 1, Pusa Basmati 1637-2-8-20-5 and Pusa Basmati1734-8-3-85 produced 8-16 % higher yield in chemical-free cultivation in comparison to TPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HKR 98-476, CSR 30 and PAU 6297-1 yielded equally in DSR and TPR.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Material
HKR 98-476, CSR 30, PAU 6297-1e0
Treatment
DSRe0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
equallye0
Comparator
TPRe0

Verbatim

t0

“basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“HKR 98-476, CSR 30, PAU 6297-1 yielded equally in DSR as well as in TPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–809 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes flowered earlier in DSR, followed by SRI, then TPR and CFC.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Treatment
DSRe0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
earliere0
Comparator
SRI and TPR=CFCe0

Verbatim

t0

“basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“earlier flowering and maturity in DSR followed by SRI and TPR=CFC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–913 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes matured earlier in DSR, followed by SRI, then TPR and CFC.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Treatment
DSRe0
Outcome
maturitye0
Direction
earliere0
Comparator
SRI and TPR=CFCe0

Verbatim

t0

“basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“earlier flowering and maturity in DSR followed by SRI and TPR=CFC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–913 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa Basmati 1509 flowered earliest across environments.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Material
Pusa Basmati 1509e0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
earlieste0

Verbatim

t0

“basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pusa Basmati 1509recordedthe earliest flowering across the environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–986 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most genotypes had increased panicle weight, tillers and spikelets under SRI.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Treatment
SRIe0
Outcome
panicle weight, number of tillers per plant, number of spikelets per paniclee0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
other methodse0

Verbatim

t0

“basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“increase in panicle weight, number of tillers per plant, number of spikelets per panicle, percent filled spikelets, Biological yield, and grain yield under SRI over other methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most genotypes had increased filled spikelets, biological yield and grain yield under SRI.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Treatment
SRIe0
Outcome
percent filled spikelets, Biological yield, and grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
other methodse0

Verbatim

t0

“basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“increase in panicle weight, number of tillers per plant, number of spikelets per panicle, percent filled spikelets, Biological yield, and grain yield under SRI over other methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1198 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

SRI was judged best among the tested establishment methods.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Outcome
SRI was found beste0
Comparator
TPR, CFC, and DSR (wet)e0

Verbatim

t0

“basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“SRI was found best than TPR, CFC, and DSR (wet)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1299 · show in text ↑

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

155 papers in the same direction as this paper · 922 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.