Abstract
A field experiment was conducted in the guava orchard of a progressive farmer, Barehi, Allahabad Road, Rewa (M.P.) during 2015 and 2016 to study the integrated nutrient management (INM) on growth, yield and economics of guava. The INM treatment T13 (50% NPK (RDF) + 25 kg FYM + 5 kg vermicompost /tree gave maximum plant and canopy height, spread (E-W and N-S), plant girth, leaf length and width and tree volume. This was closely followed by T7 [100% NPK + Zn (0.5%) + B (0.2%)] + Mn (1%) foliar spray twice to organic mulching 10 cm thick) and then T4 (100% NPK + organic mulching). Maximum number of fruits per tree, fruit weight and yield per tree were recorded under the same treatment T13, followed by T7 and then T4. All the treatments were significantly superior to control. The treatment T13 recorded maximum fruit yield (91.8 q/ha), as well as net income up to Rs.172520/ha with B: C ratio 4.03. This was equally followed by T7 and T9 (88.6 to 89.4 q/ha and Rs.165020.00 and Rs.169220.00/ha).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
T13 gave the maximum plant and canopy height, spread, girth, leaf dimensions and tree volume in guava.
- Taxon
- Guava
Psidium guajavat0 - Treatment
- T13 (50% NPK (RDF) + 25 kg FYM + 5 kg vermicompost /treee0
- Outcome
- plant and canopy height, spread (E-W and N-S), plant girth, leaf length and width and tree volumee0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The INM treatment T13 (50% NPK (RDF) + 25 kg FYM + 5 kg vermicompost /tree gave maximum plant and canopy height, spread (E-W and N-S), plant girth, leaf length and width and tree volume.”
t0“Guava (Psidium guajava L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T7 followed T13 for guava growth traits.
- Taxon
- GuavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- T7 [100% NPK + Zn (0.5%) + B (0.2%)] + Mn (1%) foliar spray twice to organic mulching 10 cm thick)e0
- Outcome
- closely followede0
- Direction
- closely followede0
- Comparator
- T4 (100% NPK + organic mulching)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This was closely followed by T7 [100% NPK + Zn (0.5%) + B (0.2%)] + Mn (1%) foliar spray twice to organic mulching 10 cm thick) and then T4 (100% NPK + organic mulching).”
t0“Guava (Psidium guajava L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T13 produced the maximum fruit number, fruit weight and yield per tree.
- Taxon
- GuavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- T13e0
- Outcome
- number of fruits per tree, fruit weight and yield per treee0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Comparator
- T7 and then T4e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum number of fruits per tree, fruit weight and yield per tree were recorded under the same treatment T13, followed by T7 and then T4.”
t0“Guava (Psidium guajava L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
All nutrient management treatments were significantly superior to control.
- Taxon
- GuavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- All the treatmentse0
- Outcome
- superiore0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All the treatments were significantly superior to control.”
t0“Guava (Psidium guajava L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T13 yielded 91.8 q/ha, the maximum fruit yield.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatment T13 recorded maximum fruit yield (91.8 q/ha), as well as net income up to Rs.172520/ha with B: C ratio 4.03.”
t0“Guava (Psidium guajava L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T13 produced net income up to Rs.172520/ha.
- Taxon
- GuavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- T13e0
- Outcome
- net incomee0
- Value
- Rs.172520/hae0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatment T13 recorded maximum fruit yield (91.8 q/ha), as well as net income up to Rs.172520/ha with B: C ratio 4.03.”
t0“Guava (Psidium guajava L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T13 had a benefit to cost ratio of 4.03.
- Taxon
- GuavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- T13e0
- Outcome
- B: C ratioe0
- Value
- 4.03e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatment T13 recorded maximum fruit yield (91.8 q/ha), as well as net income up to Rs.172520/ha with B: C ratio 4.03.”
t0“Guava (Psidium guajava L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T7 and T9 followed T13 with fruit yields of 88.6 to 89.4 q/ha.
- Taxon
- GuavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- T7 and T9e0
- Outcome
- q/hae0
- Direction
- equally followede0
- Value
- 88.6 to 89.4 q/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This was equally followed by T7 and T9 (88.6 to 89.4 q/ha and Rs.165020.00 and Rs.169220.00/ha).”
t0“Guava (Psidium guajava L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T7 and T9 had net incomes of Rs.165020.00 and Rs.169220.00/ha, respectively.
- Taxon
- GuavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- T7 and T9e0
- Outcome
- Rs.165020.00 and Rs.169220.00/hae0
- Direction
- equally followede0
- Value
- Rs.165020.00 and Rs.169220.00/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This was equally followed by T7 and T9 (88.6 to 89.4 q/ha and Rs.165020.00 and Rs.169220.00/ha).”
t0“Guava (Psidium guajava L.)”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results
55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
55 papers more in this group
See all 59 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.