Paper · 2017 · Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Integrated Control of Pepper Root Rot

Tarabeih, Abd El-Hamid; Shahada, Wafaa; El-Saedy, Mohamed; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Isolation trials of pathogens causing root rot disease of pepper plants collected from El Behera and El-DakahliaGovernorates revealed the presence of two isolates of Rhizoctonia solani, one of each of Fusarium solani, F. oxysporum,Alternaria alternate, Sclerotium bataticola and Phytophthora capsaci. Isolation from seeds of 2 pepper cvs. Sweet(California wonder) and hot (Cayenne) exhibited the presence of A. alternate, F. solani and S. bataticola. F. solani wasmore present on sweet pepper (41.5%) than hot pepper (38.2%).The reaction of the pepper cultivars to the isolated fungi showed that the mixed infection; with all tested fungi, wassevere pathogenic, the sweet cultivar was more susceptible (Total mortality 73%) than the hot cultivar (47%), both peppercvs, showed significant decrease in shoot and root fresh and dry weight compared with the control.In vitro studies; 2 isolates of each T. harzianum, T. viride and one of Bacillus subtilis were used. The results showedthat B. subtilis significantly decreased the growth diameter of the tested pathogens. T. viride isolate 2 and T. harzianumisolate 1 were more effective. Tazolien fungicide at 0.19 g/ li was superior followed by Rhizolix-T at 0.45g/l. Hot pepperoil and camphor oil completely inhibited the growth of F. solani, S. bataticola and R.solani at 500 mg/l.Green house experiments showed that T. harzianum significantly decreased infection percentages (less than 7%) inboth cultivars with mixed inoculation infection. Rhizolix-T. at 0.45 g./l. was next, where it decreased the infection up to 3-10% (53-83% untreated control). The use of hot pepper oil and camphor oil significantly decreased infection up to 20% inhot pepper and 30-37% in sweet pepper.Seed treatment increased significantly the chlorophyll content of leaves. Estimation of total phenols in leaves ofpepper cultivar showed increase of phenol content after infection, the increase was more in hot pepper than the sweetcultivar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root rot samples yielded Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium solani, F. oxysporum, Alternaria alternate, Sclerotium bataticola and Phytophthora capsaci.

Taxon
peppert0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
presence of two isolates of Rhizoctonia solani, one of each of Fusarium solani, F. oxysporum,Alternaria alternate, Sclerotium bataticola and Phytophthora capsacie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“revealed the presence of two isolates of Rhizoctonia solani, one of each of Fusarium solani, F. oxysporum,Alternaria alternate, Sclerotium bataticola and Phytophthora capsaci.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–300 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. solani was more prevalent on sweet than hot pepper seeds, at 41.5% versus 38.2%.

Taxon
peppere0
Material
sweet peppere0
Interactor
F. solaniFusarium solanie0pathogen
Outcome
F. solani wasmore presente0
Direction
more presente0
Value
41.5%e0
Qualifier
38.2%e0
Comparator
hot peppere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · InteractorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F. solani wasmore present on sweet pepper (41.5%) than hot pepper (38.2%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–525 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed infection caused greater mortality in sweet than hot pepper, 73% versus 47%.

Taxon
peppert0
Material
sweet cultivare0
Outcome
Total mortalitye0
Direction
more susceptiblee0
Value
73%e0
Qualifier
47%e0
Comparator
hot cultivare0

Verbatim

e0

“the sweet cultivar was more susceptible (Total mortality 73%) than the hot cultivar (47%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed infection significantly decreased shoot and root fresh and dry weight in both pepper cultivars.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
mixed infectiont0
Outcome
shoot and root fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“both peppercvs, showed significant decrease in shoot and root fresh and dry weight compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“the mixed infection; with all tested fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–638 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis reduced pathogen growth diameter in vitro.

Taxon
peppert0
Interactor
tested pathogense0pathogen
Second interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth diameter of the tested pathogense0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. subtilis significantly decreased the growth diameter of the tested pathogens.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1066 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum reduced infection below 7% in both cultivars under mixed inoculation.

Taxon
peppert0
Treatment
T. harzianume0
Interactor
T. harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
infection percentagese0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
less than 7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“T. harzianum significantly decreased infection percentages (less than 7%) inboth cultivars with mixed inoculation infection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1490 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizolix-T lowered infection to 3–10% versus 53–83% in untreated controls.

Taxon
peppert0
Treatment
Rhizolix-T. at 0.45 g./l.e0
Outcome
infectione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
3-10%e0
Qualifier
53-83%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizolix-T. at 0.45 g./l. was next, where it decreased the infection up to 3-10% (53-83% untreated control).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1491–1599 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment increased leaf chlorophyll.

Taxon
peppert0
Treatment
Seed treatmente0
Outcome
chlorophyll content of leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatment increased significantly the chlorophyll content of leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1726–1799 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection increased pepper leaf phenols, more in hot than sweet cultivar.

Taxon
peppere0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
infectione0
Outcome
phenol contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Estimation of total phenols in leaves ofpepper cultivar showed increase of phenol content after infection, the increase was more in hot pepper than the sweetcultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1800–1966 · show in text ↑