Paper · 2018 · Journal of AgriSearch

Morphological, Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Poplar Plants to Drought Stress

ARADHNA KUMARI; IM KHAN; ANIL KUMAR SINGH; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Poplar clone Kranti was selected to assess the morphological, physiological and biochemical responses under drought at different levels of water stress, as it is a common clone used to be grown in Uttarakhand for making paper and plywood. The cuttings of Populus deltoides L. (clone Kranti) were exposed to four different watering regimes (100, 75, 50 and 25% of the field capacity) and changes in physiological and biochemical parameters related with drought tolerance were recorded. Alterations in physiological (i.e. decrease in relative water content) and biochemical parameters (i.e. increase in proline and soluble sugar content and build-up of malondialdehyde by-products) occurred in all the three levels of water stress, although drought represented the major determinant. Drought treatments (75%, 50% and 25% FC) decreased plant height, radial stem diameter, harvest index, total biomass content and RWC in all the three watering regimes compared to control (100% FC). Biochemical parameters like proline, soluble sugar and MDA content increased with severity and duration of stress, which helped plants to survive under severe stress. It was analyzed that for better wood yield poplar seedlings should avail either optimum amount of water (amount nearly equal to field capacity of soil) or maximum withdrawal up to 75% of field capacity up to seedling establishment period (60 days). Furthermore, this study manifested that acclimation to drought stress is related with the rapidity, severity, and duration of the drought event of the poplar species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress decreased relative water content.

Taxon
Populus deltoides L.Populus deltoidese1
Material
clone Krantie1
Treatment
watering regimese1
Outcome
relative water contente0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus deltoides
Populus deltoides · TaxonR. A. Nonenmacher · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decrease in relative water content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–554 · show in text ↑
e1

“The cuttings of Populus deltoides L. (clone Kranti) were exposed to four different watering regimes (100, 75, 50 and 25% of the field capacity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased proline and soluble sugar content.

Taxon
Populus deltoides L.Populus deltoidese1
Material
clone Krantie1
Treatment
watering regimese1
Outcome
proline and soluble sugar contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus deltoides
Populus deltoides · TaxonR. A. Nonenmacher · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in proline and soluble sugar content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–634 · show in text ↑
e1

“The cuttings of Populus deltoides L. (clone Kranti) were exposed to four different watering regimes (100, 75, 50 and 25% of the field capacity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress led to buildup of malondialdehyde by-products.

Taxon
Populus deltoides L.Populus deltoidese1
Material
clone Krantie1
Treatment
watering regimese1
Outcome
build-up of malondialdehyde by-productse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus deltoides
Populus deltoides · TaxonR. A. Nonenmacher · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“build-up of malondialdehyde by-products”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–678 · show in text ↑
e1

“The cuttings of Populus deltoides L. (clone Kranti) were exposed to four different watering regimes (100, 75, 50 and 25% of the field capacity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought treatments decreased plant height, radial stem diameter, and harvest index relative to full field capacity.

Taxon
Populus deltoides L.Populus deltoidese1
Material
clone Krantie1
Treatment
Drought treatments (75%, 50% and 25% FC)e0
Outcome
plant height, radial stem diameter, harvest indexe0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control (100% FC)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus deltoides
Populus deltoides · TaxonR. A. Nonenmacher · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought treatments (75%, 50% and 25% FC) decreased plant height, radial stem diameter, harvest index, total biomass content and RWC in all the three watering regimes compared to control (100% FC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–977 · show in text ↑
e1

“The cuttings of Populus deltoides L. (clone Kranti) were exposed to four different watering regimes (100, 75, 50 and 25% of the field capacity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased total biomass content relative to control.

Taxon
Populus deltoides L.Populus deltoidese1
Material
clone Krantie1
Treatment
Drought treatments (75%, 50% and 25% FC)e0
Outcome
total biomass contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control (100% FC)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus deltoides
Populus deltoides · TaxonR. A. Nonenmacher · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought treatments (75%, 50% and 25% FC) decreased plant height, radial stem diameter, harvest index, total biomass content and RWC in all the three watering regimes compared to control (100% FC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–977 · show in text ↑
e1

“The cuttings of Populus deltoides L. (clone Kranti) were exposed to four different watering regimes (100, 75, 50 and 25% of the field capacity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–382 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline, soluble sugar, and MDA content rose with stress severity and duration.

Taxon
Populus deltoides L.Populus deltoidese1
Material
clone Krantie1
Treatment
stresse0
Outcome
proline, soluble sugar and MDA contente0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus deltoides
Populus deltoides · TaxonR. A. Nonenmacher · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“proline, soluble sugar and MDA content increased with severity and duration of stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1092 · show in text ↑
e1

“The cuttings of Populus deltoides L. (clone Kranti) were exposed to four different watering regimes (100, 75, 50 and 25% of the field capacity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–382 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend field capacity water or withdrawal to 75% field capacity through 60 days for better wood yield.

Taxon
poplar seedlingsPopuluse0
Outcome
optimum amount of water (amount nearly equal to field capacity of soil) or maximum withdrawal up to 75% of field capacitye0
Qualifier
seedling establishment period (60 days)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for better wood yield poplar seedlings should avail either optimum amount of water (amount nearly equal to field capacity of soil) or maximum withdrawal up to 75% of field capacity up to seedling establishment period (60 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1393 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors related drought acclimation to the rapidity, severity, and duration of drought.

Taxon
poplar speciesPopuluse0
Treatment
drought evente0
Outcome
acclimation to drought stresse0
Qualifier
rapidity, severity, and duratione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acclimation to drought stress is related with the rapidity, severity, and duration of the drought event of the poplar species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1560 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Populus deltoidesResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

drought · growth · Populus deltoidesResults agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.